Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-22 Thread Lauren Child
> And did not sign any agreements or NDA's saying that I would not sell trade > or give them away. The material is copyrighted so I could not copy it but as > for a trade or sale? > Looks like its changed unless our uni had a special license - http://www.cla.co.uk/www/fair

RE: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Snyder, LeRoy F
I have taken the course, but I would also recommend taking the course. I would not recommend copying or trading the material at all. We are professional individuals. I assume you all are some-what smart or more. But I find that us "techies" lack the full common sense of non-techies. We are success

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Lauren Child
Chris Larson wrote: > And did not sign any agreements or NDA's saying that I would not sell trade > or give them away. The material is copyrighted so I could not copy it but as > for a trade or sale? > Actually you could over here (see www.cla.co.uk ). There must be someth

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Jim Erickson
IIRC, in my BSCN course book, within the first few pages, there was "license" text indicating that I could not resell or transfer the books. How that would hold up in court, who knows. ---JRE--- "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Tue, 2

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Chris Larson
ssage - From: "Marc_Andre Giroux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:31 PM Subject: Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0 > I would recommend you go out and take the course Theft

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Chris Larson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:31 PM Subject: Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0 > I would recommend you go out and take the course Theft is never a good > alternative... > Marc Giroux > System Engineer II > Cisco Systems Ca

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Curtis Call
The courseware is a book correct? If so then you definately have the right to sell or trade it to whomever you please (fair use). Of course if it is software with a restrictive EULA then perhaps you don't have that right. At 02:45 PM 11/21/00 -0600, you wrote: >On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Marc_Andr

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Tim O'Brien
mom or a co-worker, do you consider that theft? Tim - Original Message - From: "Marc_Andre Giroux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:31 PM Subject: Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVO

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Brian
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Marc_Andre Giroux wrote: > I would recommend you go out and take the course Theft is never a good > alternative... What are you talking about? I own the courseware, the official courseware. I can trade it or sell it if I please. I am looking to trade the original cou

Re: Trade CATM 2.0 for CVOICE 2.0

2000-11-21 Thread Marc_Andre Giroux
I would recommend you go out and take the course Theft is never a good alternative... Marc Giroux System Engineer II Cisco Systems Canada Co. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondiscl