To: Peter Slow
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: supernetting question
Peter,
Maybe you will need to explane me this one
if you do a summarisation with this mask you will include some network
who wasn't there in the question
what happen if those networks are on a different inte
Peter,
Maybe you will need to explane me this one
if you do a summarisation with this mask you will include some network
who wasn't there in the question
what happen if those networks are on a different interface
I still keep my word to say , you need consecutive networks
Yves Routhi
no not really.
what you will want to do is configure null interfaces on those routers tho...( i think)
1010 -- 10
0001 -- 16
-- 0
this is the third octet, and all the bits are the same up to 19.
so yes, your aggregation is correct. (i think)
- Peter (i think, therefore i am not
t: Re: supernetting question
first , to be able to do supersubneting you need to have consecutive
network
"A.Strobel" wrote:
>
> What is the correct supernet for the followings:
>
> 172.29.10.0 255.255.255.128
> 172.29.16.64 255.255.255.192
> 172.29.0.0 255.255.
Absolutely, any supernet you did here would include a bunch of non listed
space..
Brian
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, ROUTHIER, YVES wrote:
> first , to be able to do supersubneting you need to have consecutive
> network
>
>
>
> "A.Strobel" wrote:
> >
> > What is the correct supernet
first , to be able to do supersubneting you need to have consecutive
network
"A.Strobel" wrote:
>
> What is the correct supernet for the followings:
>
> 172.29.10.0 255.255.255.128
> 172.29.16.64 255.255.255.192
> 172.29.0.0 255.255.255.224
>
> is my calculation of 172.29.0.0/19 cor
6 matches
Mail list logo