Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-11 Thread Anil Gupte
, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: Brian Dennis To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: RE: Simple config issues [7:70482] Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? If your router does not have a route to x.x.x.x it will not install the static route in the routing table since

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-11 Thread John Neiberger
: Brian Dennis To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: RE: Simple config issues [7:70482] Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? If your router does not have a route to x.x.x.x it will not install the static route in the routing table since the next hop is unreachable. As far as RIP goes

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-11 Thread MADMAN
router rip network 63.x.x.0 exit ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 63.x.x.193 int s0/0 ip address 63.x.x.194 255.255.255.248 So what did I miss? Thanx, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: Brian Dennis To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: RE: Simple config issues

Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread Anil Gupte
I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in sh run However, when I do a sh ip route, it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway of last resort is not set 2. I

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread John Neiberger
Anil Gupte 6/10/03 4:25:10 PM I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in sh run However, when I do a sh ip route, it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:46 PM + 6/10/03, Anil Gupte wrote: I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in sh run Is x.x.x.x a reachable address through the routing table? However, when

RE: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread Brian Dennis
Do you have a route to x.x.x.x? If your router does not have a route to x.x.x.x it will not install the static route in the routing table since the next hop is unreachable. As far as RIP goes you are seeing the correct behavior. Remember that RIP is classful. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread Devrim Yener KUCUK
comments inline: - Original Message - From: Anil Gupte To: Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:46 PM Subject: Simple config issues [7:70482] I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x it depends

Re: Simple config issues [7:70482]

2003-06-10 Thread Brian W.
issues [7:70482] I am trying to configure a 2600 router. I have two problems: 1. I issued the default route command ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x I can see this under ip classless in sh run However, when I do a sh ip route, it does not appear there and in fact says: Gateway of last