helps :)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2002 01:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]
I've seen some stuff on Cisco, but it has only been for the 7500, 1, and
12000 series routers. I haven&
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 22 November 2002 04:32
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]
>
>
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> I've been hunting for specific technical documentation on
>> stateful
>> failover between NAT in
t: 22 November 2002 04:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> I've been hunting for specific technical documentation on
> stateful
> failover between NAT instances in two routers, or even PIX.
I don't know about
ursday, November 21, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]
> I've been hunting for specific technical documentation on stateful
> failover between NAT instances in two routers, or even PIX. I can
> find lots of marketing references in the description of the Cisco
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> I've been hunting for specific technical documentation on
> stateful
> failover between NAT instances in two routers, or even PIX.
I don't know about routers, but there's an OK document about PIX failover
here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030
I've been hunting for specific technical documentation on stateful
failover between NAT instances in two routers, or even PIX. I can
find lots of marketing references in the description of the Cisco
GRIP architecture, and details of stateful IPsec failover. No
details of NAT failover.
On ass
6 matches
Mail list logo
