Would an ACL blocking 224.0.0.0 be appropriate? Is there a better way?
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
""Tony van Ree"" wrote in message
[EMAIL
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, J Roysdon wrote:
Would an ACL blocking 224.0.0.0 be appropriate? Is there a better way?
Goodbye, OSPF. Goodbye, EIGRP. Goodbye, Mrs Calabash, wherever you are.
Even assuming a more selective ACL, I'm not sure where it would go, as
putting it on the 2948 (which I suppose
uot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stop multicast to router
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:44:23 +1000
Hi all,
I have been presented a problem I'm not sure of the answer.
I have a CAT5000 switch connecting several VLAN's and a Cisco2948 providing
routing/switching. One of the VLAN's has a
Hi all,
I have been presented a problem I'm not sure of the answer.
I have a CAT5000 switch connecting several VLAN's and a Cisco2948 providing
routing/switching. One of the VLAN's has a process that uses a multicasts. These
multicasts cause the Cisco2948 a little grief. I do not want the
Maybe I need a diagram, but you say there is some sort of routing in the
equation... can you filter this ???
- Original Message -
From: "Tony van Ree" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "studygroup" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:44 PM
Subject: Stop multi
5 matches
Mail list logo