Re: Stop multicast to router [7:15]

2001-04-09 Thread J Roysdon
Would an ACL blocking 224.0.0.0 be appropriate? Is there a better way? -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""Tony van Ree"" wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: Stop multicast to router [7:15]

2001-04-09 Thread ElephantChild
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, J Roysdon wrote: Would an ACL blocking 224.0.0.0 be appropriate? Is there a better way? Goodbye, OSPF. Goodbye, EIGRP. Goodbye, Mrs Calabash, wherever you are. Even assuming a more selective ACL, I'm not sure where it would go, as putting it on the 2948 (which I suppose

Re: Stop multicast to router

2001-04-05 Thread Stephen Skinner
uot; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stop multicast to router Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:44:23 +1000 Hi all, I have been presented a problem I'm not sure of the answer. I have a CAT5000 switch connecting several VLAN's and a Cisco2948 providing routing/switching. One of the VLAN's has a

Stop multicast to router

2001-04-04 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi all, I have been presented a problem I'm not sure of the answer. I have a CAT5000 switch connecting several VLAN's and a Cisco2948 providing routing/switching. One of the VLAN's has a process that uses a multicasts. These multicasts cause the Cisco2948 a little grief. I do not want the

Re: Stop multicast to router

2001-04-04 Thread Circusnuts
Maybe I need a diagram, but you say there is some sort of routing in the equation... can you filter this ??? - Original Message - From: "Tony van Ree" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "studygroup" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:44 PM Subject: Stop multi