Hi all,
Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows
with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our
own interface have AD. of zero.
Example
C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129
i
all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or not.
all directly connected interface have an AD of 0
- Original Message -
From: "Munit Singla"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:44 PM
Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
>
all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or
not.
> all directly connected interface have an AD of 0
> - Original Message -
> From: "Munit Singla"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:44 PM
> Subject: Strange problem of route table
> all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or
not.
> all directly connected interface have an AD of 0
> > Hi all,
> > Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it
shows
> > with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to
>
etc...
Regards.
Godswill Oletu
- Original Message -
From: Munit Singla
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
> Hi all,
> Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows
> with Administrative
o depends whether you
> want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc...
>
> Regards.
> Godswill Oletu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Munit Singla
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM
> Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
>
&g
Hi Chris,
Hi the why its showing in the rout table.I have already given my route
table.Please
refer it and do clear my confusion.
Regards,
Munit
chris kane wrote:
> > all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or
> not.
> > all directly connected interface have an AD of
l help you.
Regards.
Godswill
- Original Message -
From: Munit Singla
To: Godswill Oletu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Hi Godswill,
Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists if b
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
>
>
> Hi Godswill,
> Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists
> if both the
> commands
> are used then both entries come to the route table.As per
> your and mine
> theo
255.255.0 FE0 (AD=0)
> > >
> > > If both commands are entered option 2 will be the prefered route.
> > >
> > > So you are correct, choose the one you prefer, it also
> > depends whether you
> > > want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc.
10 matches
Mail list logo