.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
> >
> >
> >> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
> >
> >Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 11011
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403]
>
>
>> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
>
>Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
>
>JohnZ was correct in his original post, th
> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be
summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he mentioned
summarise you require all your networks to be
"contiguous".
hth,
mark.
>-Original Message-
>From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 18:03
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: SuperNetting [7:54403]
>
>
>
Are each of these a class c subnet?
-Original Message-
From: JohnZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2002 04:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
191.72.4.0
191.72.12.0
191.72.21.0
Am I
Thanks guys, this answers my question. Chuck I heard you are writing an
article on CertZone about 3550. Is that correct if so I look forward to
reading it. it's very timely.
""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> --
>
> www.chuckslongroad.info
> lik
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""JohnZ"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone correct if I am wrong here
> 191.72.1.0
x.x.0001.0
> 191.72.2.0
x.x.0010.0
> 191.72.4.0
x.x.0100.0
> 191.72.12.0
x.x.1100.
Short answer: Yes you are correct.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
JohnZ
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
The configuration you posted will result in a network that looks like the
information below.
SubnetMask Subnet Size Host Range
Broadcast
191.72.0.0 255.255.224.0 8190 191.72.0.1 to
191.72.31.254 191.72.31.255
""JohnZ"" wrote i
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
191.72.4.0
191.72.12.0
191.72.21.0
Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54403&t=54403
--
FAQ, list arch
10 matches
Mail list logo