RE: Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pe that helps. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/10/2001 09:03 am - "Lange, Eric" cc: Sent by: Subject:

RE: Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-04 Thread Lange, Eric
do adaptive shaping, but probably not with voice. Hope this helps. If someone can add additional insight to FRTS with VoIP please help. Thanks, -Eric -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

RE: Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-04 Thread John Neiberger
4/01 10:25:25 AM >>> Can you send the config? I have been spending allot of time doing traffic shaping and may be able to lend some insight if I see the config. -Eric -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:07 AM T

RE: Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Re: Traffic Shaping [7:21991] I've had odd results implementing FRTS, as well. I've been told by a Cisco engineer that it helps to reload the router after applying or changing FRTS commands. I don't know if it's necessary but he said it makes things work a little better.

Re: Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-04 Thread John Neiberger
I've had odd results implementing FRTS, as well. I've been told by a Cisco engineer that it helps to reload the router after applying or changing FRTS commands. I don't know if it's necessary but he said it makes things work a little better. I haven't noticed a difference but perhaps it's worth

Traffic Shaping [7:21991]

2001-10-03 Thread Thomas N.
Hi All, I implemeted the Traffic Shaping using map-class and assigned to subinterfaces. The PVCs sharing that physical interfaces however increase in reply time and eventually timeout. What did I do wrong? When I tried General Traffic Shaping, it worked with "traffic-shape rate" and "traffic-s