:08
Favor responder a "Cohen, Michael"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto: RE: Traffic Shaping and LLQ on MSFC's and RSM's [7:61575]
Cisco TAC states that traffic to and from the FlexWan has to be routed
through the MSFC and not just
MSFC's and RSM's [7:61575]
Could you tell me the behavior with FlexWan?
"Cohen, Michael" @groupstudy.com em 23/01/2003
17:53:54
Favor responder a "Cohen, Michael"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto: RE: Traffic
Could you tell me the behavior with FlexWan?
"Cohen, Michael" @groupstudy.com em 23/01/2003
17:53:54
Favor responder a "Cohen, Michael"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto: RE: Traffic Shaping and LLQ on MSFC's and RS
10:41 AM
Subject: RE: Traffic Shaping and LLQ on MSFC's and RSM's [7:61575]
Once I tried to use LLQ on the MSFC to priorize audio multicast traffic.
The command 'sh mls ip multicast' (a tip from a groupstudy guy) showed
that
the multicast traffic was going through the PFC,
2003 19:47:44
Favor responder a "John Humphrey"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto: RE: Traffic Shaping and LLQ on MSFC's and RSM's [7:61575]
I've encountered this issue in our production environment with policy-maps.
Here
I've encountered this issue in our production environment with policy-maps.
Here's the answer Cisco's TAC gave me. Since the msfc interfaces are
software based, the MLS engine will bypass the route processor on most of
your layer 3 packets. This prevents the shaping/policing policy from being
appli
A friend of mine mentioned that it was not possible to do traffic shaping or
LLQ on a VLAN interface located on an MSFC or RSM in a Catalyst 6500 and
Catalyst 5500 respectively. Can anyone verify this. Cisco's feature
navigator suggested that it certainly was possible on the MSFC but I didn't
see
7 matches
Mail list logo
