RE: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]

2003-01-29 Thread Claudio Spescha
hi this is a strange thing. If the routers are connected via a switch make sure that port security is disabled because the actice router has 2 MAC Adresses for the HSRP interface. see you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62136&t=62064 --

RE: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]

2003-01-29 Thread Michael Williams
I have seen times where if you connect the two routers through a switch, that spanning-tree can disrupt the HSPR Hellos, and cause problems. If you are connecting these two routers through a switch (or a swicthed environment), make sure to use spanning-tree portfast on those ports so that spanning

RE: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]

2003-01-28 Thread Daniel Cotts
sday, January 28, 2003 4:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064] > > > HSRP PROBLEM > > x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two routers. > > > f0 interface config: > x.x.x.x.36 config: > standby 1 ip x.x.x.35 > standby 1 priority 150 &

Re: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]

2003-01-28 Thread Larry Letterman
what are the routers connected too that allows the routers to talk hsrp to each other...? Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: "Raj" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:03 PM Subject: URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064] > HSRP PROBLEM

URGENT HSRP PROBLEM [7:62064]

2003-01-28 Thread Raj
HSRP PROBLEM x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two routers. f0 interface config: x.x.x.x.36 config: standby 1 ip x.x.x.35 standby 1 priority 150 standby 1 preempt delay minimum 2 standby 1 track serial0 15 f0 interface config: x.x.x.x.37 config: standby 1 ip x.x.x.35 standby 1 priority 140 standby 1 p