Re: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread MADMAN
Yes routing will solve the problem. Also the Cisco, or formerly Cisco 8110 supports a larger enet packet size. The problem with the tagged frames is that they look like giants, >1518 bytes. Dave "Arni V. Skarphedinsson" wrote: > > I have the following problem, > > I have two locations conn

RE: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread Daniel Cotts
How about two PVCs in the ATM? > -Original Message- > From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613] > > > I have the following problem, &

RE: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread Walker, James - Is
Create a 'bridge-group' by issuing the command on the interfaces you want to span. -Original Message- From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613] I have the

VLan encap. over WAN [7:52613]

2002-09-03 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
I have the following problem, I have two locations connected bya ATM from a service provide, and I get ethernet at each end, now I would like to send Vlan tagged frames 802.1q over the link, as I need to have two IP networks span both sites. But when I turn tagging on, It does not work, and the