VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Steve Smith
OK gang here is the scenario. We have a PIX at work running VPN. I have a 515 at home. Before I put the 515 at home in I could use the VPN client to connect to work. Now I can not. I remember a year or so back reading a Cisco article about this and that you had to use a certain IP range on the remo

Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
You have to do a IPSEC tunnel from Pix to Pix or Purchase VPN Concentrator. I have the same issue. >From: "Steve Smith" >Reply-To: "Steve Smith" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] >Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:15:21 GMT > &g

Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Charles Riley
ve at home. HTH, Charles ""Kevin O'Gilvie"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > You have to do a IPSEC tunnel from Pix to Pix or Purchase VPN Concentrator. > I have the same issue. > > > > > > > > >From: "Steve Smith" >

Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Greg Owens
You just need to open the ports you are using, ie 500, 47 1 > > From: "Steve Smith" > Date: 2003/03/04 Tue AM 11:15:21 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] > > OK gang here is the scenario. We have a PIX at work running VPN. I

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Georgescu, Aurelian
] Subject: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] OK gang here is the scenario. We have a PIX at work running VPN. I have a 515 at home. Before I put the 515 at home in I could use the VPN client to connect to work. Now I can not. I remember a year or so back reading a Cisco article about this and that you

Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-04 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
I am assuming he is behind a cable modem or dsl. If so, even cisco says this is not possible. If someone has this working pleas advise.. >From: "Greg Owens" >Reply-To: "Greg Owens" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] >Date:

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-05 Thread Jay Dunn
specifically listed. Jay Dunn IPI*GrammTech, Ltd. www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin O'Gilvie Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] I

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-05 Thread Martin J.
try do encapsulate IPSec in UDP, otherwise IPSec will be dropped. IKE is already UDP500, bit EPS and AH are Protocol 50 and 51. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64479&t=64358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription in

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-05 Thread BJ Rice
I may be missing something, but are you asking whether you can establish a VPN tunnel using a VPN client behind a 515 PIX firewall. The answer is yes, I do it everyday. I have a 515 at home and I use the Nortel VPN client to connect to a Contivity box at work. My scenario is not exactly like you

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-05 Thread brett spunt
ROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin O'Gilvie Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] I am assuming he is behind a cable modem or dsl. If so, even cisco says th

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-06 Thread Martin J.
i am not sure about that. i have a checkpoint FW (let's say it is stateful). behind the FW sits the VPN 3000. i connect with VPN SW Client. works fine with IPSec over UDP. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64579&t=64358 --

RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-06 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
I couldnt have said it better myself!! >From: "brett spunt" >To: "'Kevin O'Gilvie'" , >Subject: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] >Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:17:26 -0800 > >It's not possible, and here's why. The pix Vpn only support

Re: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-06 Thread Greg Owens
t; Date: 2003/03/05 Wed PM 11:16:52 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] > > I couldnt have said it better myself!! > > >From: "brett spunt" > >To: "'Kevin O'Gilvie'" , > >Subject: RE: VPN C

Re: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-06 Thread Greg Owens
te: 2003/03/05 Wed PM 11:16:52 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] > > I couldnt have said it better myself!! > > >From: "brett spunt" > >To: "'Kevin O'Gilvie'" , > >Subject: RE: VPN Client

Re: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358]

2003-03-06 Thread Greg Owens
t; Date: 2003/03/05 Wed PM 11:16:52 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN Client behind PIX [7:64358] > > I couldnt have said it better myself!! > > >From: "brett spunt" > >To: "'Kevin O'Gilvie'" , > >Subject: RE: VPN C