I think it is up to individual companies to be responsible for their own AS,
and should filter what routes and AS's they accept from peers! Ideally we
would want to "authenticate" our peers etc, but considering the expense etc
in rolling out this sort of technology you could also make use of
but DNS or IP are far more urgent ,as an
attack on either one wouldn`t stop the attacker form carrying out the attack
regards
steve
- Original Message -
From: "The Long and Winding Road"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: Who likes BGP? [7:64123]
&
At 7:55 PM + 3/1/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>
> >
>> I'm really unimpressed with this article.
>
>Me too. :-) It doesn't sound like he has any detailed information.
Let's put it this way -- BGP authentication has more options than
just an MD5 signature o
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 3:15 AM + 3/1/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >""Edwin R. Gonzalez"" wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> I came across this article about BGP earlier today,
> >> check it out;
> >>
> >> http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html
> >>
> >
At 3:15 AM + 3/1/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>""Edwin R. Gonzalez"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I came across this article about BGP earlier today,
>> check it out;
>>
>> http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html
>>
>
>
>yada yada yada :->
>
>the big point seems to
At 2:24 AM + 3/1/03, Edwin R. Gonzalez wrote:
>I came across this article about BGP earlier today,
>check it out;
>
>http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html
>
The Stephen Dugan quoted in the article has not, AFAIK, made any
contributions to IETF or NANOG. Blackhat's bio says he has presente
27;m sure it
will turn into yet another entertaining thread.
-jm
- Original Message -
From: "Amazing"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Who likes BGP? [7:64123]
> LMAO
>
> "the Bush Administration recently pointed to BGP as critical technology
that
&
Isn't it standard practice for two entities, when setting up
a peering, transit, or partial transit relationship, to agree
on what routes will be sent over the links and then develop
route filters on each side accordingly? If this is done properly,
then a misconfiguration on one side should not i
I concur
--
_
The harder you work, the luckier you get!
_
The only place success comes before
work is in the dictionary!!!
_
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LMAO
"the Bush Administration recently pointed to BGP as critical technology that
needs to be secured.
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ""Edwin R. Gonzalez"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I came across this article about BGP earlier to
""Edwin R. Gonzalez"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I came across this article about BGP earlier today,
> check it out;
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html
>
yada yada yada :->
the big point seems to be the misconfigured router incident, and it is
highly unlikely that any
I came across this article about BGP earlier today,
check it out;
http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64123&t=64123
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gr
12 matches
Mail list logo
