Hi,
I am sure a lot of you here have read Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP VolumeI. I
am reading Charpter 12 "Default routes and on-demand routing" and have a
question on page 753, it says that "After a default route is identified in
the routing table, RIP, EIGRP, IGRP will automatically advertise it".
I think Doyle's VER1 book is too old. See if he mentions this
in TCP/IP v2.
In my lab (running all 12.2(17) 05/15/03) You must redistribute
with "default information" or redis commands.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72240&t=72211
--
Vol1 covers interior protocols, while VolII covers BGP and
multicasting (not default routes)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Brunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]
I think Doyle&#
do you guys know of any newer and good book talking about redistribution and
default routes? thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72375&t=72211
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
wj chou wrote:
>
> do you guys know of any newer and good book talking about
> redistribution and default routes? thanks!
There's nothing wrong with the age of Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Volume I. The
poster who claimed that didn't know the difference between a second edition
and a second volume. Do
I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple
mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading this:
>"Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP,
>EIGRP and BGP automatically redistribute default routes while OSPF and IS-IS
>I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple
>mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading this:
>
>>"Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP,
>>EIGRP and BGP automatically redistribute default routes while OSPF and
Zsombor Papp 7/16/03 3:42:18 PM >>>
>>I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple
>>mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading
this:
>>
>>>"Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP,
>>>EIGRP and BGP automatical
To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about
redistribution.
The example simply shows configuring
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.82
The text says that the router that has that config (which is running RIP by
the way) advertises the default to other RIP routers.
It goes on
At 10:19 PM 7/16/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about
>redistribution.
>
>The example simply shows configuring
>
>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.82
>
>The text says that the router that has that config (which is running RIP by
Zsombor Papp wrote:
>
> At 10:19 PM 7/16/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about
> >redistribution.
> >
> >The example simply shows configuring
> >
> >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.82
> >
> >The text says that the router that
Hi,
Just read this on CCO:
Note: In IOS release 12.0T and later, RIP does not advertise the default
router if the route is not learned via RIP. Therefore, it may be necessary
to redistribute the route into RIP, or use the default-information originate
command.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/
Which IOS version are you using? Would you mind to send us the configs?
Here is mine with 12.2S:
=== R1 ===
!
version 12.2
!
ip subnet-zero
!
!
ip cef
!
interface Ethernet1/0
ip address 10.4.5.213 255.255.255.0
duplex half
!
interface FastEthernet2/0
ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
dup
Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
and RIP on the router then:
that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort and RIP will
advertise that route to its neighbors.
For IGRP and EIGRP see Doyle p 756
"Default
Looks like Paresh made the point. RIP on newer versions of IOS acts more
like its big brothers.
Found this config:
Router#config t
Router(config)#ip default-network 172.16.0.0
Router(config)#router rip
Router(config-router)#network 10.0.0.0
Router(config-router)#default-information originate
Router
Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
> Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
> If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> and RIP on the router then:
> that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort
> and RIP will
> advertise that route to its neighbors.
> For IGR
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
>>Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
>>If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>>and RIP on the router then:
>>that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort
>>and RIP will
>>advertise that ro
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]
Daniel Cotts wrote:
>
> Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
> If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
&g
immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: a default route question.. [7:72211]
Hello,
(config-router)#default-information ?
allowed Allow default
.1.1 ?
>The way I am doing now is just redistribute static and maybe filter to
>only 0.0.0.0 with route-map
>
>Thanks.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:58 PM
>To:
-map
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:58 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: a default route q
21 matches
Mail list logo
