ccna companion question [7:17648]

2001-08-29 Thread Teresa Presutto
CNNA Companion question (obviously I read the answer and I know the command , but I would like to know why...) Which of the following addresses would be require the use of ip subnet-zero command? 156.100.11.37 255.255.240.0 131.64.16.133 255.255.255.128 192.168.36.10 255.255.255.0 205.100.16.3

RE: ccna companion question [7:17648]

2001-08-29 Thread Christopher Supino
this explanation helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Teresa Presutto Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccna companion question [7:17648] CNNA Companion question (obviously I read the answer and I know the command

Re: ccna companion question [7:17648]

2001-08-29 Thread Teresa Presutto
: Christopher Supino To: Teresa Presutto ; Cisco Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:49 AM Subject: RE: ccna companion question [7:17648] The first answer would be correct, because it would require IP subnet-zero to be running. This command allows the router to use the zero

RE: ccna companion question [7:17648]

2001-08-29 Thread Burnham, Chris
: 29 August 2001 11:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccna companion question [7:17648] Tell a woman there are 300 billion stars in the universe and she'll believe you. Tell her a bench has wet paint on it and she'll have to touch to be sure: Ok for the ip subnet-zero concept, but I still