port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-27 Thread ian williams
I have always configured ports on CAT switch to 100/full manually instead of AUTO. What is recommended when asked this question for the CCIE written. Should both the end device ( NIC ) and switch both be configured to 100/FULL? Ian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-27 Thread John Neiberger
ian williams 5/27/03 10:29:21 AM >>> >I have always configured ports on CAT switch to 100/full manually instead of >AUTO. >What is recommended when asked this question for the CCIE written. Should >both the end >device ( NIC ) and switch both be configured to 100/FULL? I can't imagine why suc

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-28 Thread ian williams
duplex problem. I have always configured the CAT port manually so there isnt any problems. Why would you choice AUTO? - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:35 PM Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582] > >>>> ian wil

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-28 Thread Troy Leliard
gt; I have always configured the CAT port manually so there isnt > any problems. > > Why would you choice AUTO? > > > > - Original Message - > From: "John Neiberger" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:35 PM > Subject: Re: port/duplex config

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread MADMAN
lah, all errors ceased. Try manual again and the errors reappear immediately. Dave > > > > - Original Message - > From: "John Neiberger" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:35 PM > Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582] > >

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread John Neiberger
roblems this would be a speed > issue. If its some > sort of packet loss/error then this could be a duplex problem. > I have always configured the CAT port manually so there isnt > any problems. > > Why would you choice AUTO? > > > > ----- Original Message -

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Bob McWhorter
else produced errors. The Wi-lan gear only does auto. Auto on everything was the only good solution. Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Larry Letterman
y auto and wallah, all errors ceased. Try manual again and the errors reappear immediately. Dave > > > > - Original Message - > From: "John Neiberger" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:35 PM > Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582] > >

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
ian williams wrote: > > This has come up in the ccie written. A question that asks whether you should use auto or manual is really on the CCIE written? Of course, you can't answer that under NDA ;-), but I agree with John that it would be a bad question. It's implementation dependent, with change

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread John Brandis
> If your getting connection problems this would be a speed > issue. If its some > sort of packet loss/error then this could be a duplex problem. > I have always configured the CAT port manually so there isnt > any problems. > > Why would you choice AUTO? > > >

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
r network need to work together. Hope > this helps > some of you. It has made me a better technician. > > John > Sydney Australia > > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 2:43 AM > To: [EMAIL