re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-04 Thread Johnny Sun
> ÈÕÆÚ: 2001Äê3ÔÂ3ÈÕ 2:40 Ö÷Ìâ: Re: 2 ISP's >Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use >floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you >own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only. > >Vinc

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-03 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
I've asked a fair number of questions here, which would only be a starting point if I were building a solution to this problem -- even though I don't fully understand the problem yet. The key message I'm trying to convey is that the first task in developing a solution is to translate customer

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Larry Lamb
You'll have to have both ISPs adertising your block either via a static route into your network. Traffic will likely come into your network on both links but this all depends on a lot of factors. The biggest that I can think would be how the ISPs summarize your network. X1 is likely to have a m

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread J Roysdon
Internet browsing could be fixed by changing the NAT/PAT pool to the ISP still functioning (not a dynamic solution, but a quick cut-n-paste could be used to switch back and forth). For incoming access to servers, I'm pretty sure you'd need BGP to be able to announce your netblocks out each link s

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Atul Kumar Udupi
Just imagine the SOURCE IP ADDRESS ( the machine from which i am uploading the software to some destination web server ) is a valid ip address and it belongs to a ISP and imagine that ISP has gone down... HOW routing will take place... ? is that fine ? am i clear ?. 1.See 11.0.0.1 is the i

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Larry Lamb
If you have 2 links where one is used for uploading, etc as you state, this could be done with a static default route to your primary ISP, a static route to the web server off the other link, and a floating static route in case the primary ISP link failed. Config might look something like #defau

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Atul Kumar Udupi
See my dear this solution to done for a customer and not for the ISP. One of the Software development firm (MY friend works there and i want to help him out) they have two internet link from different internet service provider. earlier they were using 2 router for differnet link but now they wa

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Vincxe Fortunato
Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only. Vince Oleh Hrynchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">new

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
The first thing that should be getting defined here is not the particular technologies and products to define, but what the routing policy should be, what is meant by multihoming, what the goals and budget are, etc. Technology choices follow that. BGP does not equate to multihoming. Multihom

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Abe Mounce
I am the NOC manager for an ISP and we've done this in the past. It's called multihoming and it's really not as difficult as some might argue, but I suppose that depends on your circumstances. Honestly, don't attempt anything until you've read Halabi ch 7 and the related configs in the back, at a

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Oleh Hrynchuk
Larry Lamb wrote: > > Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly > influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll > use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East > Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Larry Lamb
Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to requi

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Atul Kumar Udupi
can u give me some more info please "Larry Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on > the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from o

Re: 2 ISP's

2001-03-02 Thread Larry Lamb
Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message <97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >Greetings, >Hello All I would like to know ,