Hee, hee. This is very funny. As soon as I saw it I said too myself, "this
looks really familiar." These are bullet points in my book, Top-Down
Network Design. The bullets are in the CID class also and are based on
concepts that Howard Berkowitz and Peter Welcher taught me. They might be
in BS
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Hunt Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: subnet routing scheme question
>>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:56:24 -0800
>>
>>Hee, hee. This is very funny. As
iscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Hunt Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: subnet routing scheme question
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:56:24 -0800
>
>Hee, hee. This is very funny. As soon as I saw it I said too myself, "this
>looks really
iscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Hunt Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: subnet routing scheme question
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:56:24 -0800
>
>Hee, hee. This is very funny. As soon as I saw it I said too myself, "this
>looks really
>At 01:53 PM 2/1/01, Fred Danson wrote:
>>I dont understand why the answer "C) Routing protocols must carry the
>>prefix length with the 32bit address" doesn't apply to the question of
>>"When you develop a subent routing scheme, to which guideline must
>>you adhere?"
>
>"Subnet routing scheme"
No problem. I was hoping you would quibble. &;-) That's how I learn.
Priscilla
At 07:16 PM 2/1/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >At 01:53 PM 2/1/01, Fred Danson wrote:
> >>I dont understand why the answer "C) Routing protocols must carry the
> >>prefix length with the 32bit address" doesn't ap
I love this guy. :)
"Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:p05001925b69faa757aa6@[63.216.127.98]...
> >At 01:53 PM 2/1/01, Fred Danson wrote:
> >>I dont understand why the answer "C) Routing protocols must carry the
> >>prefix length with the 32bit address" doesn't apply
7 matches
Mail list logo
