Re: [c-nsp] GRE router recommendations

2007-04-21 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Fri Apr 20, 2007 at 11:14:16PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: At the sites where I need to tunnel from are currently 3550 switches (and a few 3750's). What sort of GRE performance should I see from those? GRE is not supported on the small Catalyst switches. It does work (in

Re: [c-nsp] New hardware choose help needed

2007-04-21 Thread Phil Mayers
WS-SUP720 Catalyst 6500 / Cisco 7600 Supervisor 720 Fabric MSFC3 PFC3A 1 PFC-3A is End-of-line, buggy and the same price as a -3B Do NOT buy a -3A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Traffic generator

2007-04-21 Thread Jonathan Charles
Use WANkiller from solarwinds... there is a freeware demo out there... Jonathan On 4/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I´d like to stress some our links. Does anyone know a free traffic generator? At. LUIZ PAULO MAIA Gerência de Redes e Telecomun / ATOS ORIGIN

Re: [c-nsp] GRE router recommendations

2007-04-21 Thread Brett Frankenberger
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: 7600/Sup720 will do whatever you need, provided you use a different local address for each tunnel source (if you have multiple tunnels on the same local IP address, the hardware can't do the tunneling, and the CPU is much

Re: [c-nsp] Traffic generator

2007-04-21 Thread Liviu Pislaru
hello, pktgen module included in the Linux kernel. ... Network Testing --- Packet Generator -- liviu. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:31 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Traffic generator Hi, I´d like to stress some our

[c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread omar parihuana
Hi list, We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, however ISIS was proposed too. What is the best? IS-IS or OSPF? and Why? regarding the small network. Thank you for your suggestions... Rgds. -- Omar

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Gary Stanley
At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote: check the archives, this has been discussed before.. it boils down to use what you're most comfortable and familiar with, and as you're using OSPF already, the choice should be clear. Indeed. Stick with OSPF.

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Alex Burba
How about just to read this: :) http://www.amazon.com/OSPF-Choosing-Large-Scale-Networks/dp/0321168798/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-8633462-4102568?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1177196013sr=8-2 On 22/04/07, Gary Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote: check the

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS or OSPF as IGP?

2007-04-21 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: omar parihuana wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM: Hi list, We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, however