Hi,
I have a 2Mb serial link with the main provider. However when i issue
the following command, it says 'Available Bandwidth 1536 kilobits/sec'.
Can some one plz explain why it is this behavior?
Regards
-Azher Amin
gw#sh queue serial 0/0/0:0
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); T
Welcome the miracle of tacacs.
On 4/21/07, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> > omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM:
> >
> > > Hi list,
> > >
> > > We're redesigning a small MPLS
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P
> > Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF,
How about just to read this: :)
http://www.amazon.com/OSPF-Choosing-Large-Scale-Networks/dp/0321168798/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-8633462-4102568?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177196013&sr=8-2
On 22/04/07, Gary Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote:
> >check
At 01:50 PM 4/21/2007, Oliver Boehmer \(oboehmer\) wrote:
>check the archives, this has been discussed before.. it boils down to
>"use what you're most comfortable and familiar with", and as you're
>using OSPF already, the choice should be clear.
Indeed. Stick with OSPF.
omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM:
> Hi list,
>
> We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P
> Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF,
> however ISIS was proposed too. What is the best? IS-IS or OSPF? and
> Why? regardin
Hi list,
We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P Routers
-Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, however ISIS was
proposed too. What is the best? IS-IS or OSPF? and Why? regarding the small
network.
Thank you for your suggestions...
Rgds.
--
Omar E
hello,
pktgen module included in the Linux kernel.
... Network Testing ---> Packet Generator
--
liviu.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:31 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Traffic generator
Hi,
I´d like to stress some our links. Does anyone know a
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> 7600/Sup720 will do "whatever you need", provided you use a different local
> address for each "tunnel source" (if you have multiple tunnels on the
> same local IP address, the hardware can't do the tunneling, and the CPU
> is much
Use WANkiller from solarwinds... there is a freeware demo out there...
Jonathan
On 4/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I´d like to stress some our links. Does anyone know a free traffic
> generator?
>
> At.
>
> LUIZ PAULO MAIA
> Gerência de Redes e Telecomun / ATOS
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:14:43PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> At the sites where I need to tunnel from are currently 3550 switches (and
> a few 3750's). What sort of GRE performance should I see from those?
GRE is *not* supported on 3550/3750s (see the archives for more details).
> Assum
> WS-SUP720 Catalyst 6500 / Cisco 7600 Supervisor 720 Fabric MSFC3 PFC3A 1
PFC-3A is End-of-line, buggy and the same price as a -3B
Do NOT buy a -3A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ns
On Fri Apr 20, 2007 at 11:14:16PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
> > At the sites where I need to tunnel from are currently 3550
> > switches (and a few 3750's). What sort of GRE performance
> > should I see from those?
>
> GRE is not supported on the small Catalyst switches. It does
> wor
13 matches
Mail list logo
