Re: [c-nsp] MPLS or ?

Troy Beisigl wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We are looking to do the setup shown below. Customer 1 has 3 locations (A, B > and C) and would like to be able to pass private traffic between all (WAN) > and would also like to get internet access as well. Two of those locations > will be DS1 circuits

Re: [c-nsp] Would millions of TxPause mean my 6500 is too slow?

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008, Deny IP Any Any wrote: > I have a 6506 with a Sup2 running in Hybrid (7.6/12.1) mode. It has a > X6548-GE-TX, with many high-bandwidth devices on it. I am not seeing > any interface errors, and nothing but zero's in a 'show asicreg port > pinnacle err', however, I am getting m

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 10K MPLS VPN

On Monday 17 March 2008, FAHAD ALI KHAN wrote: > Guys Hello. > Im stuck in configuring MPLS L3VPN in Cisco + juniper in > my test lab environment. As Oli has suggested, a copy of your configurations on both IOS and JunOS would help. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Tech wrote: > We currently run Cisco 7206VXR's using c7200-p-mz.122-25.S train in an > ISP environment. I am looking to get some 6500's but I'm a little > confused as to which IOS to get as 12.2 'service provider' seems to just > have deferred software. > > Other than

Re: [c-nsp] Prepare for router Wednesday

Hi, On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:04:17PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > This is one precondition for creating a market for intelligence derived > by comparing subsequent IOS versions. Certainly an interesting > development. Nothing new here. IOS release notes tend to be very vague regarding bugs

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 10k?

Another option would be to get something that does OC3 ports (or bigger) and lets you map out DS1s to subinterfaces. Not sure what Cisco cards would be appropriate. Something like an Adtran opti system, and appropriate cisco card, you could run an OC3/12/48 into your Cisco. I'm sure Adtran woul

Re: [c-nsp] Prepare for router Wednesday

* Gert Doering: > What they are *not* doing is "post security advisories every few weeks > for things that are not (yet) known out in the wild". Because when they > do that, people *will* go out trying to find the exploit, and then everybody > has to scramble to upgrade, multiple times a year. T

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

It's the same thing becuase they are the same processor. :) On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:56:10PM -0400, David Coulson wrote: > Rodney Dunn wrote: > >Push more load and the CPU will go up but your overall no drop rate > >and performance is much more with that newer processor. > > So a similar, if no

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

David Coulson wrote: > Rodney Dunn wrote: >> Push more load and the CPU will go up but your overall no drop rate >> and performance is much more with that newer processor. > > So a similar, if not the same, argument as to CPU usage on the NPE-G2? :) 7201 is essentially NPE-G2 "in a box", so yes,

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

David Coulson wrote: > Rodney Dunn wrote: >> Push more load and the CPU will go up but your overall no drop rate >> and performance is much more with that newer processor. > > So a similar, if not the same, argument as to CPU usage on the NPE-G2? :) Exactly. The 7201 is a NPE-G2 on a stick. I w

Re: [c-nsp] ARP and less specific interface entries

You're right, of course, there's just two types of ARP entries, and in my case, they were incomplete. interface FastEthernet0.5 description George encapsulation dot1Q 5 ip address a.b.c.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 10.1.4.1 255.255.255.0 sec

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

> I have 2 256M DIMMS installed. If I pull the second one it > says I only have > 128M. For some reason it is only seeing half the ram on each DIMM. Typically this means the DIMMs are "double sided", and the initialization routines either (a) cannot physically handle them due to physically wir

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow Top Talkers?

Netflow for novices = ntop with the netflow plugin activated. It is free, and runs natively on Linux. You can get it here - You can get it here - http://www.ntop.org/overview.html If Linux is not your thing, then OpenXTRA repackages it in a windows executable that will also get the job done. htt

[c-nsp] MPLS or ?

Hi all, We are looking to do the setup shown below. Customer 1 has 3 locations (A, B and C) and would like to be able to pass private traffic between all (WAN) and would also like to get internet access as well. Two of those locations will be DS1 circuits and the third will be DS3. All circuits

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

Hi Mark, On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 08:45 -0700, Mark Tech wrote: > Hi > We currently run Cisco 7206VXR's using c7200-p-mz.122-25.S train in an > ISP environment. I am looking to get some 6500's but I'm a little > confused as to which IOS to get as 12.2 'service provider' seems to > just have deferr

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow Top Talkers?

try ip accounting on your interface, it won't impact your cpu much on a T1 link and will give you you top "IP" talkers, you probably want to append the output packets option to it to see who is downloading the most, a "sh ip accounting" will give you a list of IP's and byte counts for that

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

>> So a similar, if not the same, argument as to CPU usage on the NPE-G2? :) Aha! That explains why I couldn't find this with my archive search. I knew it had been discussed, but I was looking for "7201, cpu" and not "npe-g2, cpu" Thanks, -mark ___ c

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

Don't worry about it. Push more load and the CPU will go up but your overall no drop rate and performance is much more with that newer processor. The only way you can prove it is either in a lab with testing gear or watch from drops with the 'sh int'. You will see overruns or ignores once the cap

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

Rodney Dunn wrote: > Push more load and the CPU will go up but your overall no drop rate > and performance is much more with that newer processor. So a similar, if not the same, argument as to CPU usage on the NPE-G2? :) David ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

>> Most of your CPU usage comes from interrupts. >> sh int st >> Lets see what your interfaces are doing. GigabitEthernet0/0 Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out Processor 589376909233 534637238990 Route cache 3561281996

Re: [c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

Mark Kent wrote: > CPU utilization for five seconds: 54%/53%; one minute: 52%; five minutes: 52% > PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process > 462800142161 19 0.08% 0.03% 0.02% 0 Per-Second > Jobs > 741108 4356194 0 0

[c-nsp] Netflow Top Talkers?

I have a pretty simple requirement: Customer calls up and complains that their link (T1) is slow, I take a quick look at MRTG for their link and see that it is at >95% utilization. I would like a quick way see what traffic is saturating the link. It seems that Netflow Top talkers is what I want.

[c-nsp] 7201 cpu (revisited)

I know that we've had 7201 vs 7301 cpu load discussions here before, but check out this graph: http://a.mainstreet.net/7201.jpg I swapped a 7201 in for a 7301 Saturday evening and the Monday cpu load went from the 40's to the 50's. The box is doing this: LAN: 30 second input rate 17628200

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

Hi Troy, I had the same problem a few months ago when turning up a 12k. I had 2x256 sticks but only one would register. I believe I upgraded the Boot Image to get it to read the other stick. Hit me up off of the list of you need help with the procedure. -nmp -Original Message- Fr

Re: [c-nsp] Would millions of TxPause mean my 6500 is too slow?

You are most likely oversubscribing the 6548-GE linecard (this card is 8:1 oversubscribed). This card is not designed for attaching your high bandwidth devices. If you turn off 'Tx' flowcontrol, you will probably start seeing indiscards, which is indicative of oversubscription. You probably shou

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

I have 2 256M DIMMS installed. If I pull the second one it says I only have 128M. For some reason it is only seeing half the ram on each DIMM. Troy Beisigl -Original Message- From: Matt Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:32 AM To: Troy Beisigl; e ninja; Mat

[c-nsp] IOS version

Hi We currently run Cisco 7206VXR's using c7200-p-mz.122-25.S train in an ISP environment. I am looking to get some 6500's but I'm a little confused as to which IOS to get as 12.2 'service provider' seems to just have deferred software. Other than that the only other options are 12.2.33-SXH1 (

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 10K MPLS VPN

Hi, I've never ran any form of MPLS without LDP on the interface, but if you're using RSVP-TE, LDP on the physical interfaces should not be needed. Can you show your working and your not-working config? The decision which path (LDP or RSVP-TE signalled path) is taken by the headend depends on the

[c-nsp] Would millions of TxPause mean my 6500 is too slow?

I have a 6506 with a Sup2 running in Hybrid (7.6/12.1) mode. It has a X6548-GE-TX, with many high-bandwidth devices on it. I am not seeing any interface errors, and nothing but zero's in a 'show asicreg port pinnacle err', however, I am getting millions (per day) of flowcontrol TxPause frames on so

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

On Monday 17 March 2008, Matt Addison wrote: > Have you installed a single 512M stick, or 2x 256M sticks? It may not be > able to recognize the extra banks in a 512M DIMM and thus would only be > able to see the first 256M of it. Yeah, those 256M DIMM's are pretty interesting. They're just like s

Re: [c-nsp] 12008 GRPB memory problem.

Have you installed a single 512M stick, or 2x 256M sticks? It may not be able to recognize the extra banks in a 512M DIMM and thus would only be able to see the first 256M of it. ~Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Beisigl Sent: Fri

Re: [c-nsp] show ip bgp community (not X) ?

Hi Mike, On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 19:35 -0700, Michael Smith wrote: > I realize you're asking a bigger question but, in answer to your one > above, you can do a "sho ip bgp community | exclude to exclude>". Hmm... When I do a "show ip bgp community" it only shows routes with communities, not what

[c-nsp] Cisco MDRR MIB

Hello, I'm trying to build a graph for link utilization per queue for every line card, I'm using a 12416 router (IOS 12.0(30)S5, engine 2 line cards and MDRR configuration. I can't find the proper MIB in Cisco MIB support list, Do you know where can I find the CISCO MDRR MIB? Thanks in advance,

[c-nsp] WS-X6148-FE-SFP

Hi Has anyone experience with the WS-X6148-FE-SFP card or the WS-X4248-FE-SFP card. E.g. Do the GLC-FE-100xx work flawlessly agains other 100FX/LX media converters? The buffers for X6148-FE-SFP seam ok Transmit queue 1p3q8t/5.2MB dedicated per port 1p1q4t/64KB shared by 8 ports _

Re: [c-nsp] vtp/spanning tree limitation

Hi, > Hi Folks. > Hope you can help me out here. > What is the maximum numbers off switches that at vtp-domain can handle. > I was told that it was 64 is that correct, or has this something to do with > spanning tree ?? the number of VLANs that switches can support for VTP depends on the make an

[c-nsp] vtp/spanning tree limitation

Hi Folks. Hope you can help me out here. What is the maximum numbers off switches that at vtp-domain can handle. I was told that it was 64 is that correct, or has this something to do with spanning tree ?? /Arne ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puc

[c-nsp] 7606(SUP32) 12.2(33)SRB2 arp-table problem.

Good day! Cisco7606 with sup32, IOS 12.2(33)SRB2, c7600s3223_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M On this device are fifteen vlan-interfaces. One interface have netmask /24 Three interface have netmask more than /30 Two of this interfaces are ospf-interface in different areas. Sponta

[c-nsp] PGW STP connection

Hi Anyone has working configuration where the pgw has to you STP. I have done a case where you have only the DPC. In this case I have the DPC and an additional point code for the STP. I would appreciate if anyone has some mml command to tie the two. Currently I have this line prov-add:SS

[c-nsp] Cisco 10K MPLS VPN

Guys Im stuck in configuring MPLS L3VPN in Cisco + juniper in my test lab environment. I have Cisco 10K as PE connected to DSL IPoA client, Cisco 7206VXR as another PE connected with other IPoA client. MPLS P routers are of Juniper (J4300). for MPLS L3VPN there is no need to run LDP on core facing

[c-nsp] Problem on AS5350XM

Dear guys, We want to do prepaid calling card service and termination on one AS5350XM. Already connected to PSTN and ISDN. The problem is when I call from PSTN regular phone to our special number, I can hear no signal but the call duration counts on, seems like call is made. Actually we can't he

Re: [c-nsp] ARP and less specific interface entries

Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote: > We have some devices with management IPs in the 10.1.0.0/16 range that I > manage and I needed to split up into two groups. All the devices were > statically assigned an IP address in the form of 10.1.3.x/255.255.0.0, so I > added two more secondaries for router int

Re: [c-nsp] About bgp fast-external-fallover

Hi, I don't think it's useful for iBGP, assuming you have a redundant IGP path to your iBGP neighbour. There are situations when the route to the iBGP neighbour is withdrawn following the failures, but re-installed a few seconds later after IGP convergence. So if you tear down the session right

Re: [c-nsp] About bgp fast-external-fallover

Hi, I configured "neighbor x.x.x.x fall-over" commands. I checked that iBGP peer went down immediately after link down on iBGP. I think it is useful command on iBGP. Regards, Hiromasa Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote [2008/03/07 17:19(JST)]: > Christian Meutes <> wrote on Friday, March 07, 2008