On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Jason Berenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've recently simplified QoS on our edge routers. Here's what we're using:
class-map match-any Core_Voice_Signaling
match access-group name Core_Voice_Signaling
class-map match-any Core_Voice_RTP
match
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 01:09 -0400, D W wrote:
I've been tossing around a few ideas for an enterprise MPLS-based
solution. The idea would involve the SP runnig a CSC based model with
the enterprise customer at multiple large sites. The reason is to
support multiple sub-organizations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tor-Ivar Kristoffersen wrote:
| The thing you are reffering to is a statement in the docs that states
| that in order to utilize 50 ap'on the 4402 you need to connect both
| interfaces. The maximum number of access points that is allowed on a
|
Hi,
Thanks to all who offered advise - It was the IP address in the end. I'd
setup DHCP Option 43 to the ap-manager interface address, and not the
management one. Now that's corrected all is fine. I'm still confused as to
how this particular network has worked in the past though!
Thanks again,
I have always used the ap-manager interface in my DHCP option 43 configuration.
My understanding is that the Management interface is used for controller to
controller traffic to terminate EOIP tunnels. I would call your configuration
correct now :)
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e:
Your configuration is wrong then. The DHCP option should point to the
management interface. The AP should do a LWAPP Discover and the management
interface should return a list of IP addresses that the AP can connect to
(ap-manager address(es)), along with the relative load on each interface
(max
Interesting.
Why does it work?
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
From: Fred Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---BeginMessage---
Your configuration is wrong then. The DHCP option should point to the
management interface.
Nathan,
- We prioritize signaling because if one starts to lose OPTIONS messages
for example the call will be torn down.
- How can I run that without an ACL?
- Nothing useful in the logs and nothing gets printed to console. We
need to have different QoS maps for custom jobs so applying a map
I'm trying to get L2TPv3 figured out to help with a project. I've got a test
network consisting of 2 3640s (which is what is going to be used as the
endpoints of the tunnels in the production network) connect by a crossover
cable. Even using sample configs from the cisco site, I can't seem to
Yes, with 3845's, post your test config.
Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
954-298-1697
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Pfister
Sent: Thursday, May 22,
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:36:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting.
Why does it work?
speculate
If management and ap-manager addresses are in the same VLAN on the controller
then perhaps that particular controller model with that particular software
will forward the packet to the
If an access point has connected to a controller, I believe that it
attempts to connect to that controller as part of the discovery process.
It is another of those 'invisible' configuration errors, that only
raises its head months or years after the fact.
You could test with a new access point,
When an AP initially connects to a controller it will save the list of
controllers in the same mobility group to NVRAM, and attempt to connect to
those controller (management addresses) upon reboot. It is likely a
caveat in the code running on the controller/AP, or a result of a proper
management
On May 22, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Steven Pfister wrote:
Does anyone have a working L2TPv3 tunnel between two 3640s?
According to the feature navigator, L2TPv3 doesn't exist on the 3600
series.
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/
The configs are below.
By the way... whenever I post to this list, I get replies both to me and to the
list (so I get two copies). Is this intentional? Just curious...
Thanks!
--Steve
--
router 1
--
Current configuration : 1374 bytes
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug
On May 22, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Steven Pfister wrote:
I know, but the image I'm using (12.3(14)T7) does have all the
commands, and the tunnel does come up very briefly.
Well then your config should look something like (assuming a Ethernet
to Ethernet L2 vpn):
Router A:
l2tp-class foo
Why does it not stay up. GRE is smart enough to tell you if you have a
recursive routing loop. L2TPv3 has no clue since it would be a second box
doing the routing outside of the L2TPv3 router. The router only knows that
the next hop changed. How long has the next hop been installed in the
routing
There is no routing protocol configured in your sample configs? No static
route to the next hop. No interface with an ip address, besides the
loopback. I still think recursive route somewhere.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Reimer wrote:
| When an AP initially connects to a controller it will save the
| list of controllers in the same mobility group to NVRAM, and
| attempt to connect to those controller (management addresses)
| upon reboot.
On this point I *think*
I know, but the image I'm using (12.3(14)T7) does have all the commands, and
the tunnel does come up very briefly.
Steve Pfister
Technical Coordinator,
The Office of Information Technology
Dayton Public Schools
115 S. Ludlow St.
Dayton, OH 45402
Office (937) 542-3149
Cell (937) 673-6779
We are preparing to rollout a dual headend / dual cloud DMVPN solution for
remote sites, distributed throughout the country. We have migrated a couple
of sites over, and have experienced some intermittent connectivity problems,
which appear to be related to MTU settings.
I've read all of the
It laziness because a reply to all sends traffic to both...
Your loopback addresses are in the same subnet, which is not a valid
configuration. As someone else mentioned, you'll need a route to the
loopback address of the other end, either via a dynamic routing protocol or
static routes.
HTH,
Hi All,
I am summarizing an issue I am seeing, wondering if anyone might have
some input on this.
In the following topology, I have a floating static route (distance 250)
redistributed into EIGRP on R1 which sends the redistributed route to R2
which sends it to R3. R4 sees the EIGRP route from
Can you ping the loopbacks from the opposite router? There's nothing in
either config that indicates how traffic flows from one router to the other.
You said you're using an ethernet x-over to connect them, but surely it's
not on the ports on which you've setup xconn statements.
Each router
It may not bring up the link without a reason to; you might need to generate
some traffic and have both Ethernet ports plugged in...
Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
954-298-1697
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to have EIGRP redistribute into BGP as well?
Once in the BGP table, local redistribute routes will have a weight of 32768
which will be prefered over the EBGP weight of 0. I remember reading over
at the Netpro forum and someone said that it's a racing condition: EIGRP
converge faster
Yes, I should have known... connecting switches to the routers brought the
tunnel up and I think everything is OK now...
Thanks to all who responded!
Steve Pfister
Technical Coordinator,
The Office of Information Technology
Dayton Public Schools
115 S. Ludlow St.
Dayton, OH 45402
Office
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Jason Berenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan,
- We prioritize signaling because if one starts to lose OPTIONS messages for
example the call will be torn down.
OK thanks :-)
- How can I run that without an ACL?
The only way would be to make sure they get
Nathan,
Thanks for your help. Here's some more information that I probably
should have provided in my first email. I will continue to do some
trial and error debugging.
7206 NPE-G1
PA-A3-OC3MM
c7200-is-mz.124-19.bin
-Jason
Nathan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Jason Berenson
Hi All
We have a 6509 with 2 x 1300W power supplies? rephrase we had :) - anyway,
one of the power supplies has died, we are sourcing a replacement however,
in the meantime I have another 6509 sitting next to me however it has 1800W
power supplies.
The question
Can I run a 6509 with 1 x 1300W
Jarrod Friedland wrote:
Can I run a 6509 with 1 x 1300W and 1 x 1800W (redundant)? Are the issues
with doing this we should be aware of? I have asked this question of cisco
integrators however all we get is The engineers have put their heads
together and say NO
My understanding is YES, with
con.clu.sive (kn-klsv)
adj.
Serving to put an end to doubt, question, or uncertainty; decisive.
I don't think you will ever know conclusively. The best bet is to create
a TAC case and have them put a 1300W and 1800W power supply in a 65009
chassis loaded with the same cards that you have. Good
Hi,
I don't know an answer to your question. But there is a tool called
'power calculator' for the cat65k on cisco.com. Maybe this Cam help
your find an answer.
regards
Mark
Am 23.05.2008 um 03:51 schrieb Jarrod Friedland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Hi All
We have a 6509 with 2 x 1300W
We have a 6509 with 2 x 1300W power supplies? rephrase we had :) - anyway,
one of the power supplies has died, we are sourcing a replacement however,
in the meantime I have another 6509 sitting next to me however it has 1800W
power supplies.
Does 'sh mod' say they're 1800W's, or are you just
34 matches
Mail list logo
