[c-nsp] Cat3560E - insufficient buffers for microbursts?

Hi all, recently we replaced some of our access switches by Cat3560E models. After the change, we noticed a significant rise of dropped packets on outgoing interfaces. Closer investigation showed, that for some reason, Cat3560E is doing significantly less output buffering than all other

Re: [c-nsp] mls qos vlan-based issues

Hi Leslie, I am seeing something similar, but I am not seeing policing in either direction :-) 12.2(33)SXH when I check with sh policy-map interface, I do not see the exceed counters incrementing. On 27/02/2009 20:14, Leslie Meade wrote: I have an issue that I cannot work out. I had

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP Binding Expiration

Yes, I've noticed that all affected clients are BOOTP clients! -- From: Buhrmaster, Gary g...@slac.stanford.edu Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 7:51 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP Binding Expiration BOOTP. Have

[c-nsp] CCIE Lab tools

Hi All I have a question about CCIE Lab exam , we heard many stories about some exam trick and IOS bugs which causes technologies to fail and losing point so is there any tool available in the exam to identify if there is IOS bug cause this problem ? i know there is documentation tool but that

[c-nsp] No. of VRF supported

Hi All, I would like to know the max. number of VRF supported on Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) and Cisco 10K. Regards, AHQ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] high cpu load not by processes

Thanks for the tip! In my case though there were no single processes loading the cpu: #sh proc cpu | e 0.00 CPU utilization for five seconds: 48%/35%; one minute: 32%; five minutes: 32% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 1962138 427846338 49

Re: [c-nsp] No. of VRF supported

Amjad Ul Hasnain Qasmi wrote on Monday, March 02, 2009 11:04: I would like to know the max. number of VRF supported on Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) and Cisco 10K. it depends.. Don't think there is a hard/fixed limit on the 7200, we used to recommend not more than 1000 (NPE-G2 can push more,

Re: [c-nsp] Cat3560E - insufficient buffers for microbursts?

We are seeing similar problem not to be able to achieve good thorughput speeds even with 12.2(46). 2009/3/2 sth...@nethelp.no: We got around this by configuring shaping (which is possible on the ME3400) and setting queue-limit 256 in the policy-map. The problem seems to be resolved in

Re: [c-nsp] CCIE Lab tools

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All I have a question about CCIE Lab exam , we heard many stories about some exam trick and IOS bugs which causes technologies to fail and losing point so is there any tool available in the exam to identify

[c-nsp] finding bad actors on Cat 2924 ports

I have a Cat 2924 with a port facing an old Waverider radio. I've got about 80 MACs live on the interface, it's got a steady 5% error rate, and the net effect is that it's behaving like WRED with a nearly full cue - traffic for all slows to a crawl. I've been fiddling with it a bit trying to

[c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

We are in the process of migrating from ATM Circuits at our locations to point to point fiber. I have a Cisco 7206vxr with NPE-G2 so currently I have 3 GigE ports over Copper and have the option to add SFP's if need be to go to fiber. If I need more GigE ports in this Chassis are the only

[c-nsp] Voice translation-rules on FXS voice-port don't work.

Sorry for crossposting this from cisco-voip - figured maybe someone here might know. Original Message Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Voice translation-rules on FXS voice-port don't work. Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:03:45 -0500 From: Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com To:

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

AFAIK, the PA-GE is only available supporting a GBIC, so there is no native copper interface. I've never tried using a 1000b-T GBIC in a PA-GE before, but I wouldn't count on it working -- Cisco only lists the PA-GE as supporting optical GBICs. Depending on your application, you might be able to

[c-nsp] Verizon's PIP service

Anyone happen to know if Verizon relies on any 3rd party service providers (using inter-AS MP-BGP, ATOM, etc.) for their PIP (MPLS based private IP) service? I'm trying to figure out which service providers have a national reach and fully contain/control their own MPLS clouds without relying

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

PA-GE is the only available option for more GE ports on the 7206vxr...and it's one interface per module and 1000b-TX GBICs work just fine in the slot. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of bi...@waveform.net

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

I have used a copper GBIC (WS-G5483) with a 7500 and a GEIP+ before. But not with a GEIP (VIP2-50+PA-GE). It may work, though. The 'official' answer is in http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.html But, that document doesn't show

Re: [c-nsp] Verizon's PIP service

On 2-Mar-09, at 14:45:12, D W wrote: Anyone happen to know if Verizon relies on any 3rd party service providers (using inter-AS MP-BGP, ATOM, etc.) for their PIP (MPLS based private IP) service? I'm trying to figure out which service providers have a national reach and fully

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

Actually, you can install a C7200-I/O-GE+E and save yourself a PA slot and the associated bandwidth point hit. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/101247 Brandon Gregori Parker wrote: PA-GE is the only available option for more GE ports on the 7206vxr...and it's one interface

[c-nsp] SNMP MIB for IP SLA on Pix/ASA 7.x?

Does anyone know if the Pix/ASA has support for polling IP SLA monitor status in the 7.x (or even 8.x) OS? It don't seem to support the standard RTTMON-MIB like IOS does. Thanks, Brian -- Brian C Landers http://www.packetslave.com/ CCIE #23115 ___

[c-nsp] Export routes from VRF to the global routing table

Hi list, I am almost confident this is not possible, but would like to confirm whether exporting routes from some VRF to the global routing table is possible or not. This would be a solution to overcome the constraints of using PBR+GRE setup. Thanks in advance.

Re: [c-nsp] Export routes from VRF to the global routing table

Hello Leonardo, I guess you'll use route leaking to accomplish what you want. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml Gustavo. On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Leonardo Gama Souza leonardo.so...@nec.com.br wrote: Hi list, I am

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

On 03/03/2009, at 6:04 AM, Rhino Lists wrote: If I need more GigE ports in this Chassis are the only options to add a PA-GE? I read where a PA-GE will not support the copper gigabit? Hi Nope, that's not correct. We've run copper gbics in a pa-ge on 7206- VXR / NPE-G1 before. David

Re: [c-nsp] ipsec support on 7600

The answer is no. I just got into this recently. The software crypto feature is in SXF but no longer in SR releases. You need to get the IPSec module for hardware crypto. - Original Message From: Marlon Duksa mdu...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net