Re: [c-nsp] ftp.cisco.com unusable?

>(The ftp.cisco.com brokenness has plagued me as well, but I've completely >given up complaining about issues with www or ftp.cisco.com) Because of the borked ftp.cisco.com, I have generally used ftp-sj.cisco.com instead, and it works just fine "all the time". /Stig

Re: [c-nsp] ftp.cisco.com unusable?

Hi, On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 06:19:47PM +, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > I've sent an email to my SE and all DNS contacts at cisco.com I could > find a week ago, but no answer so far. I'll kick my SE on Monday if it > hasn't improved until then. Any news? (The ftp.cisco.com brokenness has plagued

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2 SXI, 12.2 SRC route-map question.

Scratch that, I fell off the stupid tree today. -- Stephen Stephen Fulton wrote: Hi all, I am banging my head against the wall with a particular route-map, and I'm seriously wondering if I drank the stupidity kool-aid today. I'm testing a route-map between two BGP speakers, a 7600 running

[c-nsp] 12.2 SXI, 12.2 SRC route-map question.

Hi all, I am banging my head against the wall with a particular route-map, and I'm seriously wondering if I drank the stupidity kool-aid today. I'm testing a route-map between two BGP speakers, a 7600 running 12.2(33)SRC1 and an ME6524 running 12.2(33)SXI, and for the life of me I cannot get

Re: [c-nsp] 7206vxr cpu usage.

Keith wrote: Have a 7206vxr w/NPE-G1 and a couple of PA gig adapters, one with an SFP one with a GBIC. We have a fiber connection that was 100Meg, plugged into GE0/1. We added another fiber connection that is GigE and connected to the GBIC. This morning I cut over from the old 100meg fiber to t

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Dial-Plan Assistance

Gregory Boehnlein wrote: > I have a few Cisco 2600s configured as PRI gateways... > So the call flow that I'm looking for is: > Carrier PRI -> Cisco -> Asterisk Server -> Cisco -> Customer PBX You need to give the VOIP dial-peer a lower preference: dial-peer voice 2000 voip preference 1 dial-p

Re: [c-nsp] 7206vxr cpu usage.

On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Dodd, Steven wrote: |->Are you pushing more traffic through using the new GigE interface? The |->7200 uses CPU for everything. No, traffic levels are the same right now. We were maxing out the 100 meg link sometimes at peak times. During the day the link does avg about 70-80 m

Re: [c-nsp] 7206vxr cpu usage.

Are you pushing more traffic through using the new GigE interface? The 7200 uses CPU for everything. -Steve -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keith Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:22 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.ne

[c-nsp] 7206vxr cpu usage.

Have a 7206vxr w/NPE-G1 and a couple of PA gig adapters, one with an SFP one with a GBIC. We have a fiber connection that was 100Meg, plugged into GE0/1. We added another fiber connection that is GigE and connected to the GBIC. This morning I cut over from the old 100meg fiber to the fiber in th

[c-nsp] Cisco Dial-Plan Assistance

Hello, I have a few Cisco 2600s configured as PRI gateways. Most of them have very simple dial-plans, but I'm struggling w/ a more complex plan for a Dual-PRI configuration and I think I'm missing something simple. Here is a run-down of the configuration Carrier PRI <-> Serial 1/0:23 Cust

Re: [c-nsp] eigrp questions

The HSRP address is only virtual, but the 6509 should also have an actual address on VLAN 2, different from the HSRP address. It is probably the .2 or .3 you're seeing in the routing tables. Issue a "show int VLAN2" on the 6500 to see its actual address. HSRP is generally used to provide redunda

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS LDP and BGP Neighbor flapping constantly

You appear to have a high number of input queue drops and input errors, granted the counters have never been cleared, do you haver any PPS graphs of the link between these two boxes? I would suspect a traffic spike or link fault causing control messages to be dropped being the cause here. Dave. J

[c-nsp] eigrp questions

I have two 6509's with sup 32 running HRSP and ether channel links between them. On Vlan2 I have two routers, one that handles T1 and the other DMVPN. All devices have eigrp running. Vlan 2 is my routed network to these devices. The HRSP ip on the 6509 is 10.1.2.1 On my both of my routers tha

Re: [c-nsp] Conflicting OSPF router-ids in separate VRFs

Harold, Thanks for the reply. This sounds odd to me. Why wouldn't IOS be able to handle conflicting OSPF router-ids for OSPF processes in different VRFs? I could certainly see the problem if these were separate OSPF processes that were in the global VRF but I would think that VRF separatio

Re: [c-nsp] Conflicting OSPF router-ids in separate VRFs

Justin, The OSPF RID needs to be globally unique on the box. There is no way around it. Regards -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:27 AM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM and mixed IPv4/IPv6 access-list

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Leif Sawyer wrote: Is anybody working with FWSM's and mixed-mode IPv4+IPv6 ACL's? I'm having trouble with traceroute6 not succeeding, but ping6 working fine: You might be getting caught by flawed behavior of the FWSM. I

Re: [c-nsp] Redundant SUP32-10G

Thank you for answers! Subject is now clear. -- Konstantin Barinov On 05-Mar-09 16:00, Håvard Nyhus wrote: Please help me to understand, if there are redundant SUP32-10GE's in chassis, is it possible to use all 4 10G ports at wire speed simultaneously? What type of interconnection do supervi

Re: [c-nsp] Redundant SUP32-10G

> Please help me to understand, if there are redundant SUP32-10GE's > in chassis, is it possible to use all 4 10G ports at wire speed > simultaneously? What type of interconnection do supervisors use > between them? All four ports can be used at the same time - however, they will be oversubscribe

[c-nsp] rotary-like dynamic NAT pool

Dear All i was searching for dynamic NAT technology that utilize the NAT pool in rotary fashion for inside source addresses like rotary NAT technology does for destination addresses best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASA 5505 multiple netblock functionality

Hi, The default license allows for 2 unrestricted vlans + 1 restricted ('dmz'). The restricted one cannot initiate traffic towards one of the other vlans. # sh ver Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(4)16 ... Hardware: ASA5505, 256 MB RAM, CPU Geode 500 MHz ... Licen

Re: [c-nsp] ftp.cisco.com unusable?

On (2009-02-28 18:26 +0100), Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: > Guys, > > I can recreate it from my PC as well. > It seems that: > - download-sj-1 and download-sj-2 work > - download-sj-3 and download-sj-4 are broken > > I will file a case for this with Cisco IT. Any news? > > Arie > > -Ori

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 Router's Default IPSec Throughput Rate

Thank you so much :) Regards, Serhat -Original Message- From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:pe...@rathlev.dk] Sent: 05 Mart 2009 Perşembe 12:57 To: Serhat Candan (Probil - İstanbul) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 Router's Default IPSec Throughput Rate On Thu, 200

Re: [c-nsp] Redundant SUP32-10G

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 11:33 +0200, Konstantin Barinov wrote: > Please help me to understand, if there are redundant SUP32-10GE's > in chassis, is it possible to use all 4 10G ports at wire speed > simultaneously? Assuming the Sup32 can do wire speed on these ports at all, then yes, each port shoul

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 Router's Default IPSec Throughput Rate

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:25 +0200, Serhat Candan wrote: > Thanks for reply. I checked the topic it is about IOS support, i need > some charts about IPSec throughput, pps etc. Then read the thread once more. :-) If it is not supported the throughput you can rely on is exactly 0. If you need IPSec

Re: [c-nsp] UDP-helper problem

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:00 +, Michael Robson wrote: > I have recently moved the routing of a subnet from an old sup2/msfc2 > 6500 (Version 12.1(26)E8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) to a newer sup3/ > msfc3 6500 (Version 12.2(18)SXF13, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)). On the old > router the udp-helper

Re: [c-nsp] ip helper and dhcp on the same device

Hi. > Is it possible to use ip dhcp pool XY for one host( use mac address) and ip > helper-address  for the others (all pc is in the same subnet). If the propose is to give the PC with the known MAC-address a fixed IP-address, this is easier[1] to do on the DHCP-server. [1] At least a no-brainer

[c-nsp] Redundant SUP32-10G

Hello All! Please help me to understand, if there are redundant SUP32-10GE's in chassis, is it possible to use all 4 10G ports at wire speed simultaneously? What type of interconnection do supervisors use between them? Thank you! br -- Konstantin Barinov INFONET AS, Tallinn, Estonia _

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 Router's Default IPSec Throughput Rate

Hello Marlon, Thanks for reply. I checked the topic it is about IOS support, i need some charts about IPSec throughput, pps etc. Regards, Serhat From: Marlon Duksa [mailto:mdu...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 Mart 2009 Çarşamba 17:57 To: Serhat Candan (Probil - İstanbul) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Su

Re: [c-nsp] Conflicting OSPF router-ids in separate VRFs

2009/3/5 Justin Shore : > I'm trying to get multiple OSPF instances to work in separate VRFs with all > OSPF instances using the same router-id. As you noticed it won't work [...] > I have OSPF configured inside the VRF in question.  This is the first of the > production GRE tunnels we've turned