Re: [c-nsp] CN=Jesus Leung/OU=AHM/OU=AM/O=HONDA is out of the office.

bra...@zcorum.com (Brian Raaen) wrote: This is the 6th time your auto-responder has replied to this list, please fix your vacation settings. ... might be difficult while being on vacation... ;-) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Multihomed network - iBGP questions

Dear, I am currently building a network and I would like to confirm my design. Two routers (A and B) will be connected to a different IP transit provider. These providers will advertise to us the full Internet table. As internal routing protocols, I would like to use iBGP for all

[c-nsp] Non SmartNet Contracts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, We are in the process of renewing our annual SmartNet contract. Because of the cost, I was looking at using a 3rd Party vendor for all equipment currently on contract as NBD (next business day). Has anyone used NetSure by Network Hardware?

Re: [c-nsp] PXE traffic down a different VLAN

You mean DHCP? Because 'PXE' traffic is essentially dhcp+tftp. The former needs IP helper, and the latter is unicast so it doesn't matter where it is. -- Randy -- Original Message --- From: Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] PXE traffic down a different VLAN

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We just use IP helper and have had no problems with our PXE boots. Christina Klam Network Administrator Institute for Advanced Study Email: ck...@ias.edu Einstein Drive Telephone: 609-734-8154 Princeton, NJ 08540 Fax: 609-951-4418

Re: [c-nsp] PXE traffic down a different VLAN

On May 20, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: is there any technology present in IOS that allows you to send PXE traffic through a different VLAN than the normal VLAN that is assigned to the switchport or do you just have to use IP HELPER? if you were sufficiently crazy, you could do

[c-nsp] 4948 management port VS vty access-group

Hi All, I use a C4948 switch with cat4500-entservicesk9-mz.122-53.SG1 IOS. I try to use the MGMT ethernet port. The config is: interface FastEthernet1 ip vrf forwarding mgmtVrf ip address 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.0 speed auto duplex auto If I telnet to the switch from 192.168.2.1 via

Re: [c-nsp] 4948 management port VS vty access-group

Hi All! Thanks for infos, the vrf-also work fine!! Best regards, Laszlo 2010-05-20 16:36 keltezéssel, Saxon Jones írta: Have you tried adding the vrf-also switch to your access-class statement? Something like: line vty 0 4 access-class 10 in vrf-also I'm not sure if this is available on

[c-nsp] MSFC3 storm control

We have a 6509 with sup720 MSFC3 and a X6516-GE-TX line card. Multicast and broadcast storm control is configured on this card. I have been working with a Cisco TAC tech on a case. He told me that in the event of a multicast storm, storm control will block BPDU's on the WS-X6516-GE-TX. This

[c-nsp] 6509 Auto Qos

All, I need to run Auto QoS for a Cisco soft phone on a 6509 running IOS 122-33.SXH1 according to the cisco docs this feature was released with this train and later. i believe its my line cards which are: 1 48 48-port 10/100 mb RJ45 WS-X6148-45AF SAL085281YQ 2 48 48 port

[c-nsp] MRC-I-12 10G

Hello All, As I have been told the MRC-I-12 card has a 10 Gig backhaul but you cannot have a true 10G pipe thru our entire network. The 10G pipe comes to a primary location like where the 7600 series router is and we feed off off it to numerous locations up to 1Gig. Correct? Best Regards,

[c-nsp] Ethernet Access Switch

Hi All, We are taking a trunk metro Gigabit Ethernet NNI from a carrier. This NNI will be used to deliver our customer circuits (10 and 20M EoC). Each customer circuit will be assigned an S-TAG by the provider. We need the ability to stack (map) two or more C-TAG VLAN IDs into each S-TAG

[c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

All: Curious what other network admins are doing out there for Ethernet interfaces as far as speed and duplex settings - weather to specify or to leave them auto negotiate. The reason I am asking is we just installed some equipment in a new data center we are in the process of bringing online

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

For us here, with 28,000+ Ethernet ports. By default all our ports are set to auto. If the device on the other end can't support autonegotiation, only than do we hard-set ports. Keep in mind on a lot of gear (Cisco included) that at 10/100 speeds, half-duplex is the default for duplex

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

Said Jeff Wojciechowski: FastEthernet0/3 is up, line protocol is up (connected) snip Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100BaseTX snip 5 minute input rate 2000 bits/sec, 3 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 3000 bits/sec, 4 packets/sec 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles It's

[c-nsp] Multiple inline devices

I was hoping to get some feedback on putting multiple devices inline on the same wire, and whether or not that is common practice, or something that should be avoided. The situation seems common to me, many IPS systems work best inline, as do WAN accelerators, but what about when you deploy both

Re: [c-nsp] Multiple inline devices

Multiple inline devices gets sketchy very quickly. During device failure, some boxes turn into crossover cables, others into straight cables. If you've got a 100Mb/s device that doesn't do MDI/MDI-X, how do you cable it up correctly so that link can be established regardless of which devices

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

Hi On 21 May 2010 07:18, Jeff Wojciechowski jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com wrote: All: Curious what other network admins are doing out there for Ethernet interfaces as far as speed and duplex settings - weather to specify or to leave them auto negotiate. {cut} We always set the port

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 Auto Qos

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:53 -0400, Chris Lane wrote: I need to run Auto QoS for a Cisco soft phone on a 6509 running IOS 122-33.SXH1 [...] any help would greatly be appreciated. Auto-QoS is not always a very good way of doing QoS, but at least it's very easy. On SXI it's something like:

Re: [c-nsp] Route-map vs WCCP

On Thursday 20 May 2010 09:19:46 pm Mohammad Khalil wrote: Dears when implementing a cache engine what is the best way to do it , route-map or WCCP ? WCCP is generally preferred due to its resiliency in case a cache server becomes unavailable. PBR works too but has no knowledge of the

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

On Friday 21 May 2010 04:09:27 am Matlock, Kenneth L wrote: For us here, with 28,000+ Ethernet ports. By default all our ports are set to auto. If the device on the other end can't support autonegotiation, only than do we hard-set ports. Same here. The typical cases where we've had to

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed network - iBGP questions

On Thursday 20 May 2010 05:42:36 pm Thierry wrote: As internal routing protocols, I would like to use iBGP for all customers' routes and OSPF for all backbone routes (loopbacks and PtP between the routers). Good. I would like to have the full internet table only on the two routers