Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:41:06 +0400 (MSD), you wrote: You can do it if you have the PFC3CXL card (available as spare for 6500 Sups), it was never productized however. I couldn't find it in GPL. VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL -A

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL It's for SUP720.. We have RSP720-3C.. -- Dmitry Valdov CCIE #15379 (RS and SP) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] isis routing problem

Arne Can someone tell me what might be wrong. I have a router connected with 2 neighbors ( R2 ). Setup.: - R0 - R1 - R2 - R3 The isis routing process on R2 don't see any L2-routes from R1, but R1 has L2 routes. R2 can se L2 routes from R3, and R1 an see L2 routes from R0. The

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 and QoS ?

On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 18:53 -0700, joe mcguckin wrote: I need to QoS SIP traffic on 60 vlans (per GigE port) on several GiGE ports. Can this be done in hardware on the 3560? Yes. But to QoS can mean many things. If you just need the switch to mark SIP traffic as EF based on L4 information and

[c-nsp] checking sun ray services with Nagios

hello, i have setup nagios and am using snmp plugin to check remote hosts' resources. we have a session server where sun ray 1 and 2 are used as DTUs. now i am able to monitor some of the services of the session server. but i am unable to check the sun ray service and other things related to it

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On 06/25/2010 07:45 AM, Dmitry Valdov wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL It's for SUP720.. We have RSP720-3C.. I doubt it matters. ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:45:13 +0400 (MSD), you wrote: VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL It's for SUP720.. We have RSP720-3C.. 1) You wrote that there is no official upgrade for the RSP 2) ?ukasz wrote that you could upgrade with the PFC3CXL upgrade, which

Re: [c-nsp] CSM probe

in my case they came from the vlan ip address where the real server resides. /BR 2010/6/25 Sony Scaria sony.sca...@gmail.com: Hello, I got a quick question, when the csm is probing the real servers, what source ip does the csm use for the probe?. ~Sony Sent from BlackBerry® wireless

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:45:13 +0400 (MSD), you wrote: VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL It's for SUP720.. We have RSP720-3C.. 1) You wrote that there is no official upgrade for the RSP 2) ?ukasz wrote

[c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

Guys I want to know whether PPPoE connections are feasible to offer higher bandwidth like upto 20 or 30 mbps. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

Hello. Guys I want to know whether PPPoE connections are feasible to offer higher bandwidth like upto 20 or 30 mbps. The general answer is yes, it's feasible. The details depend on the situation. WBR Roman A. Nozdrin ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

We do 20+ Mb/s connections all the time on PPPOE using Cisco 7206VXR-NPE-G2 today (moving to Juniper but that's a different story). Was that your question or was there something configuration related you were inquiring about? Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

Fwiw, tested an npe-225 (on 12.4t, 12.2SR, and others) and saw single-session tcp goodput at 90+ mbit, approx 55 to 60% cpu load (spent all towards cef + interrupts, as it should be). Anything higher end should do even better. -Tk -Original Message- From: Paul Stewart

Re: [c-nsp] CSM probe

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 01:08, Sony Scaria sony.sca...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I got a quick question, when the csm is probing the real servers, what source ip does the csm use for the probe?. ~Sony In my experience it comes from one of the self IP addresses, never the alias. We don't

[c-nsp] Recommend router for ATM OC-12

Hello, Someone has asked me a question regarding what Cisco router platform can handle an ATM OC-12. I did some digging and it seems the 7200 platform (with NPE-G1/G2) is unable to handle this. If a 7600 (7603 actually) was used what type of SUP/RP is needed to do ATM OC-12? (will SUP2/SUP32

Re: [c-nsp] Transfer speed issues on 3560G

Thanks to all the replies, on and off list. There is no QoS configured on the switch currently. mls qos isn't in the config. Adding srr-queue bandwidth commands to the ports did not improve the situation. The servers in question are not on the same vLAN, we're routing between SVIs. I also

Re: [c-nsp] Recommend router for ATM OC-12

Hello Rich, you could look at getting a GSR. It might be a little big though but there are plenty of WAN cards like ATM and POS available at good prices. Cheers Sascha On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Rich Davies wrote: Hello, Someone has asked me a question regarding what Cisco router platform can

Re: [c-nsp] Recommend router for ATM OC-12

SUP2 will not work as I do not believe the SIP modules needed for ATM interfaces are supported. SUP32 should work as long as the SIP needed is supported(not 100% sure about SIP support on SUP32) but SUP32 can easily move this much traffic. SUP720/RSP720 will defiantly work. -Ben On Jun

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3C-10GE with daughter card = RSP720-3CXL-10GE?

On 2010-06-25 10:33, Dmitry Valdov wrote: Right. The last question was is SUP upgrade will *work* with RSP or not? I never tried it for this particular combination, but the PFCs for 6500 and 7600 are *exactly* the same - it's a piece of hardware containing ASICs and TCAMs, connected with

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE offered bandwidth

On Friday 25 June 2010 05:25:06 pm Amjad Ul Hasnain Qasmi wrote: Guys I want to know whether PPPoE connections are feasible to offer higher bandwidth like upto 20 or 30 mbps. We've easily done 50Mbps - 70Mbps with PPPoE to a Redback BRAS for one of our products. No problems. But the

Re: [c-nsp] Transfer speed issues on 3560G

Check whether you are not running into high CPU issues due to IRQ, due to wrong SDM profile used.See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00801e7bb9.shtml -pavel On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Brandon Ewing nicot...@warningg.comwrote: Thanks to all

[c-nsp] MST Reserved VLANs on Nexus 5010

I've run into a bit of a problem with a couple of new Nexus 5010 switches we've recently acquired. I've tried to apply our standard MST configuration, and have run into the problem that the Nexus has 81 VLANs that are reserved for system use (3968 to 4047 4094), which are not reserved on any of

Re: [c-nsp] Recommend router for ATM OC-12

What if I went with the SUP2 and the Cisco OC-12/STM-4 ATM Enhanced Optical Services Module (OSM) on a 7603? I realize the OC-12 ATM OSM is EOL but if unsupported/cheap is the goal will it work with the Supervisor 2 with MSFC2? Thanks again, -Rich On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Benjamin

[c-nsp] Speed problem and router seems to sluggish

Hi all, I need some light on this problem that I'm having. We implemented 2 new routers with the following devices/modules: core2:: Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- - -- -- --- 2

Re: [c-nsp] Transfer speed issues on 3560G

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Brandon Ewing nicot...@warningg.com wrote: This is a strange issue that I have noticed on a 3560G that we have deployed.  We have two servers, on different ports, controlled by different ASICs.  Each port negotiates a 1000mb/s link, but I cannot get more than