Hi All
We replaced the Faulty ACE module with RMA module in cat 6500 chassis.
ACE moudule is being managed by ANM.
After replacing the module, while i am doing CLI synching option on this
module, following error is displaying
"Device Discovery failed: serial number mismatch, expected SAD
On 6/3/2011 3:30 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
I am, however, left with one mystery.
How can the Cisco docs on a FWSM claim a 30-usec latency when clearly it
isn't capable of that, at least not in any configuration that I'm aware
of? Granted that it's all lies, damn lies, and marketing material, but
pu
Well, technically if you can have all your tables/lookups
pre-populated
1Gb/sec = 125MB/sec
Or 125KB/msec
Or 125B/usec
A 64 byte packet will then take about 0.5usec to send or receive. That
means receiving the packet, and sending it takes 1usec of time. That
leaves 29usec of time to process t
I am, however, left with one mystery.
How can the Cisco docs on a FWSM claim a 30-usec latency when clearly it
isn't capable of that, at least not in any configuration that I'm aware
of? Granted that it's all lies, damn lies, and marketing material, but
putting that number in the main data sheet
not seeing the vpc peer-link in th config, nor a layer-3 address for
the keepalive link to communicate across.
if you are planning to use vpc -- there are a number of things wrong.
i guess a deeper understanding of your topology and what you are
attempting to accomplish is in order.
q.
-= sent v
Configuration looks right. You have vpc configured but are you using it
with the fex or are they single homed? You also have a port channel
configured but are only using one physical link?
If the fex are attached cross 5k you need vpc commands on the port channels.
Physical layout would help u
Hi Renelson,
Can you "show fex" and "show fex nnn detail" for a problematic fex?
Configs look fine.
Regards,
John Gill
cisco
On 6/3/11 3:04 PM, Renelson Panosky wrote:
First I want to thank everyone for their help yesterday but i am still
having some issues with some of them. Some of my fex
First I want to thank everyone for their help yesterday but i am still
having some issues with some of them. Some of my fex are not showing up
even though all my configs are similar. I've posted the config below
please any help would be appreciated.
sho run
!Command: show running-config
!Time:
I'm trying to achieve a function similar to LFP,link pass through (this is
what its called on Alcalu Ethernet/MPLS switches). If one side of the
psudowire is down, I would like the adjacent port to also go down to prevent
black holing traffic. Obviously lowering hold timers, or using PFR with IP
SL
Not quite all, but very helpful nonetheless and a great reference -
something like that should be in the standard "support" section for the
FWSM.
I also found another reference to performance issues in another doc
around the same time that says a lot of useful stuff:
http://www.sectao.com/redi
I've been searching Cisco documentation ( and this archive ), and i
want to confirm something with respect to 7600 VPLS
The following example shows how to create a Q-in-Q AC, with IOS XR
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:router# configure
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:router(config)# interface GigabitEthernet 0/0/0/0.2
RP/0/RSP0/
Hi,
I am getting strange error on one of the VPN router.
Error: crypto_engine_ps_vec(): no subblock attached
Cisco Router: 2821
Cisco IOS: C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M, Version 12.4(25b)
Kindly advice how to check and troubleshoot this error.
--
Regards,
Muhammad Atif Jauhar
(+60-10-2155076)
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:34:38PM +0530, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote:
> I thought the memory requirement might high but the total memory for /48
> range routes and couple of static routes [show memory summary | inc IPv6]
> summing up only around ~4mb
There's only a few thousand IPv6 routes
Some more details below, sorry for the noise.
Work around is periodic reloads and eliminating down/shutdown bgp
sessions.
I am sure there are other bugs but not sure what all of them are.
So I guess I am more likely hitting one of those other bugs :-(
I did some digging and found, that "sho
Hello,
Sorry for the long signature from my previous post ...
Just small update - I think matching by EXP on QoS won't work just because
ME3400E doesn't support MPLS :)
I think MPLS will be tunelled as other ethernet frames - just have doubts if ME
doesn't allow 0x8847 or 0x8848 frame types
Me again,
These occur due to memory leaks in the BGP process.
Disabled BGP sessions can cause memory leakage and the type of CPU issues
you are seeing.
there are currently none on this box.
Solution is upgrade to latest 12.0(33)S train.
The PRP-1 is on 12.0(33)S7. Quite new I guess.
Wor
I thought the memory requirement might high but the total memory for /48
range routes and couple of static routes [show memory summary | inc IPv6]
summing up only around ~4mb
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Justin M. Streiner
wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote:
>
> what is
Yuri,
7600 support Remote Port Shutdown per the below documentation reference,
but it does not actually shutdown the whole port, but actually used
E-OAM to signal to the CPE that the PW is down...
What are you trying to achieve?
Thanks
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@pu
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote:
what is the current industry practices in IPv6 inbound prefix filter is it
/32 or /48 ? or it depends on the global IPv6 prefix growth vs memory ?
As always, your experience may vary, but it seems like many operators are
starting to settle on
Hi all,
what is the current industry practices in IPv6 inbound prefix filter is it
/32 or /48 ? or it depends on the global IPv6 prefix growth vs memory ?
Regards,
Gobinath.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/m
Hey Tony and Gert,
Now this is getting interesting, I wasn't aware that you could run VRF's
without MPLS, I have just recently gotten the Cisco routers and don't know
everything about them or the Cisco configurations I can use. Once I get
some time today, I will start looking into how to set it u
Hi,
May be you could use something like this:
ip route 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 Null0
route-map DROP permit 10
set ip next-hop 192.168.0.1
HTH
Mohammad Khalil wrote:
Hi all
i am trying to simulate ICMP drops via PBR
route-map DROP permit 10
match ip address ICMP
match interface FastEt
Hi all
i am trying to simulate ICMP drops via PBR
route-map DROP permit 10
match ip address ICMP
match interface FastEthernet0/0.67
match length 100 100
set default interface Null0
Rack1R6(config)#route-map DROP
Rack1R6(config-route-map)#set interface null 0
% route-map:can
I was reading the document I mentioned more carefully and found one possible
explanation:
Unit Health Monitoring
FWSM determines the health of the other unit by monitoring the failover
link. When a unit does not receive hello messages on the failover link, th
Hello group,
I'm troubleshooting a FSWM Failover issue. The scenario has the two FWSM in
different chassis in Active/Active mode.
One chassis went down and the FSWM in the other chassis didn't assume the
control of the two failover groups.
The only message that was possible to capture was:
"FO_
Hello,
Our customer asked us for possibility for the following:
1. Tunneling MPLS through L2 VPN - the customer-facing device is ME3400E
2. Matching incoming MPLS traffic on ME3400E by EXP.
I'm considering to create standard dot1Q tunnel or 802.1d s-uni interface but
having doubts if this port
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:28:27PM -0400, Joseph Hardeman wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I was hoping there was some way to do it with
> Local-Prefs or weights setting the BGP routes from peers into a group and
> then selecting that group from the routing table for the internal IP Range I
> wa
27 matches
Mail list logo
