Hi
Oki
But is there any limitation hardware between 7200 and PA-GE
We are trying to redirect 600Mbps traffic to PA-ge
BUT THERE IS A LIMITATION 200Mbps plus we faced a disconnected in the ping .
BR
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
On Monday, January 30, 2012 04:14:56 PM bha Qaqish wrote:
But is there any limitation hardware between 7200 and
PA-GE We are trying to redirect 600Mbps traffic to PA-ge
BUT THERE IS A LIMITATION 200Mbps plus we faced a
disconnected in the ping . BR
The PA-GE will never do 600Mbps.
The most
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:14:56AM +0200, bha Qaqish wrote:
But is there any limitation hardware between 7200 and PA-GE
Yes, it's called PCI BUS and OLD HARDWARE.
Please go to Wikipedia and read up what a PCI bus is, and what it can do.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:50:04AM +, Ahmad Farisy wrote:
Is there any big difference for module card in 7200 when we use npe-g1 or
npe-g2 comparing to the ole npes for 7200. In my though the chassis was
remain the same, so it use the same bus data and will make the transfer data
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, bha Qaqish wrote:
But is there any limitation hardware between 7200 and PA-GE
We are trying to redirect 600Mbps traffic to PA-ge
BUT THERE IS A LIMITATION 200Mbps plus we faced a disconnected in the ping .
You're unlikely to see 600 Mb/s through a PA-GE, as other posters
Hi,
as I've experienced the same, here's a short comment.
You're unlikely to see 600 Mb/s through a PA-GE, as other posters have
mentioned. 600 Mb/s would completely saturate whichever PCI bus in which
the PA-GE is installed.
One of our 7206VXR crashed probably due to overloading a
Had a look 6-12 months ago.
At the time there were some good MDM options externally or internally
managed that could be combined with AnyConnect always on VPN for Ipads
Iphones etc.
All combined well with any potential BYOD corp policy.
It's an interesting space. Well worth having a chat to your
We're running some of the ASR1002 modular units in our network at the
moment and are quite happy with them so far. I'm more tempted to run
pairs of 1002's than 1006's with dual RP, but that's just me.
I'd stay away from the fixed configuration 1002-F though, as it's had an
EOL notice already.
On Monday, January 30, 2012 11:15:19 PM Ian Hiddleston
wrote:
We're running some of the ASR1002 modular units in our
network at the moment and are quite happy with them so
far. I'm more tempted to run pairs of 1002's than 1006's
with dual RP, but that's just me.
In peering/transit roles,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 21:54:59, Thomason, Simon wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads
I am looking at allowing IPADS to from a VPN with our ASA to provide
limited access.
I would like to ideally have the IPAD connect with a cert and username
password but have the ASA aware that
Microburst is the culprit as it has been suggested in the first email.
Default queue-limit is 100 us which is not sufficient to accommodate
10Gig burst. However you can increase the queue-limit up to maximum
queue-limit of 492 KB or 3932 us.
The reason it does not allow queue-limit policy on the
Trying to break some new ground on ASA 8.4(2) VPN configuration (quite a number
of
changes)
Need to map AD group membership onto a group policy selection.
(1) Previous examples are using the Cisco name IETF-Radius-Class to map into
the
policy name, while 8.4(2) seems to want Group Policy
Jeff,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 16:41:00, Jeff Kell wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] Quick (?) ASA VPN w/AD question...
Trying to break some new ground on ASA 8.4(2) VPN configuration (quite
a number of
changes)
Need to map AD group membership onto a group policy selection.
(1) Previous
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Steve Dodd sd...@syringanetworks.net wrote:
The only reliable method we've found to mitigate OutDiscards on the ME36/3800
platform when coming from the 10G to the 1G interfaces has been to set a
queue-limit per class.
This fixed the issue. Thank you and also
Hi Jiri,
This sounds pretty straightfoward, the thing you need to look at most
closely now is the traffic flows. Being all 10G is good because you
will be cut-through switching unless there is congestion, which causes
you to queue (store and forward).
Do you expect multiple ports to be
Hi Guys - We have a number of atm pvcs to carrier (For client tails) and we
have a small number that experience outages(weekly) - The carrier has been
investigating for months, and they have requested we disable ATM F5 OAM
Loopback / Continuity cells on the PVC's on our core(Apparently in
Hi John,
Try no oam-pvc manage cc under the PVC to stop sending of CC.
regards,
Tony.
From: John Elliot johnellio...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2012 1:49 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] disabling ATM F5 OAM Loopback /
Cheers Tony - I only have(i.e. no cc):
(config-if-atm-vc)#no oam-pvc manage ? 0-600 OAM loopback
frequency(seconds) keep-vc-up OAM loopback cells failure action cr
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:58:46 -0800
From: td_mi...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] disabling ATM F5 OAM Loopback /
John,
Just no oam-pvc manage then to disable all OAM management.
Have a look at this for other possible options:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094570.shtml#summary
It would appear that by using oam-pvc 0-600 configured without the manage
Much appreciated Tony! - Assume that the oam-pvc 0 is normal (based on
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk51/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a008054.shtml)
...
vbr-nrt 2048 2048 256
tx-ring-limit 16
oam-pvc 0
encapsulation aal5snap
vs
...
vbr-nrt 2048 2048 256
tx-ring-limit
20 matches
Mail list logo
