¢¤»iÝ4%»² O-#µj©<ýéCïÞù/ªF
I?£Zjë²¢Öë¹ÌZëì³®ÍA7´(4JÊûl«¢ªðXJfDó`: 5çñÝW%b&±#½²
ånh,aïSÞÎ$»Ä
Bíî]XLøhïhÓR/NÐlâTu7Ûª?bì.Ì^S¢NÍÈØ**§Fó.O¤>
q,0ã{L"ÛZÎ|ÊøÃ/å×åÕ8j´°ópÇ¥rAm~.ÍZ½
¸¤p²
-ZO©ð(ñ5½QWK}Tu"zvÞØþ!"¤ÉUàãࣨæG3ê¶ùëDºrnHX´¡Ü{LL±YÛ6V0&øZ2ÆfTöT³qGyë½°ñö»Ñá«<û
ݺù)
>æ
Take a look at this
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00809d16f0.shtml
This is almost always due to route churn. Take a look at your routing
table (global and/or VRF) for routes that recently updated (show ip
route | i 0:00) and that might give you some clues as to
Hi Guys, High cpu from BGP router process started ~48 hours ago - Happens
every 30 seconds (Cisco 7200, NPE-G2"normal" load is 45->50% cpu) #sh
processes cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 86%/44%; one minute: 53%; five minutes: 50%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Se
There was a thread on this topic a few months back. Unless my testing
was really messed up, ACL's do work.
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2012-July/086171.html
Looks like it depends on what line cards you are using as well.
Good luck!
--chip
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Natamb
So there's these enhancements that allow you to "deterministically map MVPN
groups to specific MDT groups".
I gather the following, from playing with it:
- you still only get one "mdt data ", only now you get to say "list
"
- otherwise it falls through to the default
- to the extent it's poss
Anyone using BVIs and l2vpn on IOS XR for routing interfaces? I am running into
some strange issue in an attempt to put 4 ASR9k's into production on my
network, but only on ipv4. I am having no issues with Ipv6 and OSPFv3, yet..The
last reference I can find to BVI in a IOS XR 4.0.1 and it says,
If you talk about traps, they don't send ifAlias.
We write script which do additional snmpwalk based on ifIndex to findout
ifAlias and then send trap with this info.
On 03.10.2012 0:15, Michael Sprouffske wrote:
> this is what I get
>
> snmpTrapOID.0 = snmpTraps.3
> ifIndex.10005 = 10005
> ifDe
If you have default snmp config on 2960, there nothing additional need
to pass interface names. Its in ifAlias not in ifDescr
On 02.10.2012 23:46, Michael Sprouffske wrote:
> What needs to be done in order for the switch to pass the descriptions of the
> interfaces. I looked at a debug and the s
What needs to be done in order for the switch to pass the descriptions of the
interfaces. I looked at a debug and the switch is only sending the physical
interface name and not the description. I did a walk on the device and was
able to pull this information.
__
On 02/10/2012 15:22, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> I thought this is on by default but apparently it's not
>
> Try
> neighbor x.x.x.x transport multi-session
In general you don't want to enable multisession bgp unless you know why
you need it and you understand all the consequences of doing so. I rea
Hi,
Thanks for your answer, I solve my problem with a route-map.
regards.
Cordialement,
Samuel CATHELINE
Service DELIVERY
Direction Technique
Tél. 02 72 73 58 25
scatheline @afone.com
AFONE - 11, place François Mitterrand - CS 11024 - 49055 ANGERS cedex 02
[ t ] 0825 168
In the spirit of conjecturing, another key point to consider is that if
it's a wireless link then the radio interface is almost certainly
half-duplex, regardless of what the ethernet interface is.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Samuel Catheline
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 3:05 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Problem with a nat configuration.
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a nat configuration problem, w
Thanks all. Also, since ipv6 seems inevitable, it would seem like a nice
way to future proof your network by simply enabling v6 af in the vrf
definition (also on me's create vrf using the definition mode for v6), the
vpnv6 af under bgp and the v6 af within the vrf specific bgp contextthat
way,
I should have mentioned that this has some serious implications to it
especially in large BGP environments
So please consider the number of TCP sessions you'll end up with on RRs as
well as on PEs
adam
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Tuesday,
I thought this is on by default but apparently it's not
Try
neighbor x.x.x.x transport multi-session
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 4:02 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.ne
No you can't keep it from resetting the neighbor if you are changing the
capabilities of a neighbor relationship. That portion is negotiated at open
state, and not on the fly.
-Blake
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Aaron wrote:
> (resending due to ugly formatting)
>
> When I enabled vpnv6 on my
On 02/10/2012 16:01, "Aaron" wrote:
>(resending due to ugly formatting)
>
>When I enabled vpnv6 on my pre-existing vpnv4 neighbor session I saw it
>bounceIs there any way around this ? ...i'm concerned about the
>interruption (for operational environment) on the underlying vpnv4 l3vpn.
>Woul
(resending due to ugly formatting)
When I enabled vpnv6 on my pre-existing vpnv4 neighbor session I saw it
bounceIs there any way around this ? ...i'm concerned about the
interruption (for operational environment) on the underlying vpnv4 l3vpn.
Would be only momentary though right?... looks l
I've relegated it to a maintenance window.
On 2012-10-02, at 9:53 AM, "Aaron" wrote:
> When I enabled vpnv6 on my pre-existing vpnv4 neighbor session I saw it
> bounceIs there any way around this ? ...i'm concerned about the
> interruption (for operational environment) on the underlying vpn
When I enabled vpnv6 on my pre-existing vpnv4 neighbor session I saw it
bounceIs there any way around this ? ...i'm concerned about the
interruption (for operational environment) on the underlying vpnv4 l3vpn.
Would be only momentary though right?... looks like 10 seconds from
"nbr_reset" to "
On 2 October 2012 15:28, Martin T wrote:
> Why is only IPv6 traffic sent to "monitor" port(Gi0/11) when RSPAN on
> "WS-C3560G-24TS" is enabled?
It seems to catch flooded traffic only, why, I cannot answer. Typical
answer is server not in promisc mode. I've had laptop where
dmesg/ifconfig would re
If I execute "no monitor session 2" in "WS-C3560G-24TS" port Gi0/11
changes from "monitoring" status to "inactive" and I can see only
CDPv2 messages in "PE860". This is expected as Gi0/11 is in
"remote-span" VLAN. If I change Gi0/11 to trunk I can see the very
same IPv6 traffic in "PE860" + other p
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Samuel Catheline wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a nat configuration problem, with a static NAT, I want exlude to
> the static nat(192.168.10.1<->217.112.66.70) the trafic to the subnet
> 10.0.13.0/24 and nat this trafic with the loopback1.
> Is there an issue?
>
> I hav
On 10/01/2012 10:31 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Tim Densmore wrote:
Stab in the dark, but have you verified you don't have a duplex
mismatch anywhere? IME, they can look exactly like that.
I seriously doubt you'd be able to get 30 megabit/s over somewhere
with a duplex
Yes there's a lack of trust or control of the switched network
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andy Ellsworth
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:36 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a device than could be placed inline between a server
> and a switched infrastructure that would encrypt L2 payload for
> communication between two such servers (round 100mbps)
> I imagine one would need two such devices
Hi
Can anyone recommend a device than could be placed inline between a server
and a switched infrastructure that would encrypt L2 payload for
communication between two such servers (round 100mbps)
I imagine one would need two such devices one at each end (or maybe a NIC in
a server)
Or is ASA capab
On 2 October 2012 10:25, Martin T wrote:
> Any other ideas?
Not really, seems like your SPAN might not be doing anything at all.
Can you confirm this by removing SPAN config, leaving port just as
trunk, and see if you capture same set of packets?
--
++ytti
___
Hello,
I have a nat configuration problem, with a static NAT, I want exlude to the
static nat(192.168.10.1<->217.112.66.70) the trafic to the subnet 10.0.13.0/24
and nat this trafic with the loopback1.
Is there an issue?
I have the following NAT configuration:
interface Loopback1
descript
Saku,
thank you for reply! According to /var/log/messages and kernel ring
buffer, eth0 enters to promiscuous mode:
Oct 2 02:55:39 PE860 kernel: [7745928.328025] device eth0 entered
promiscuous mode
Oct 2 02:55:43 PE860 kernel: [7745931.459236] device eth0 left promiscuous mode
In addition, if
31 matches
Mail list logo
