[c-nsp] BGP NSR without SSO

Hi all How can deploy BGP NSR without SSO on 12000 XR or such mechanism to decrease the packet loss when link flapped without BGP sessions reset ( ex: XR Router multi homed with different ISP ) the packet loss happens on the other during the recalculation of the best path. thanks ZH

Re: [c-nsp] ASR903 - firmware versions

It looks like the ROMMON version. They're upgradable if need be. This looks like what you're looking for: http://www.cisco.com/cisco/software/release.html?mdfid=283780951flowid=3020 1softwareid=282046486release=15.3%282r%29Srelind=AVAILABLErellifecycle= reltype=latest Obviously, read all the

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

Hi Pete, Do you know what caused the 3 secs blip? How can Cisco claims that it is non-disruptive then? Thanks for sharing. Regards, Alexander Lim On 7 Nov, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Pete Templin peteli...@templin.org wrote: On 11/6/12 3:35 PM, Tóth András wrote: Hi Antonio, In general, doing a

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

On 11/7/12 6:02 AM, Alexander Lim wrote: Do you know what caused the 3 secs blip? How can Cisco claims that it is non-disruptive then? Thanks for sharing. From what I've learned from others, the 'install all' unpacks the new files which run the processes, and then the processes are

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM INT 0 configure

On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:49 +0800, zhangyongshun wrote: but is found out that always a private ip address in show xlate state identity 's output. like this: ... *Global 10.11.1.21 Local 10.11.1.21* ... 10.11.1.21 this user isn't able to access outside through NAT. Have anybody know such

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

At 06:05 AM 11/7/2012, Pete Templin mused: On 11/7/12 6:02 AM, Alexander Lim wrote: Do you know what caused the 3 secs blip? How can Cisco claims that it is non-disruptive then? Thanks for sharing. From what I've learned from others, the 'install all' unpacks the new files which run the

Re: [c-nsp] BGP NSR without SSO

Hi Zaid, decrease the packet loss when link flapped without BGP sessions reset You can use BFD with eBGP peers Than you can use either: address-family ipv4 vrf 1 maximum-paths eibgp 8 bgp advertise-best-external or: address-family ipv4 vrf 1 bgp advertise-best-external bgp

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 SLAAC on P2P or QinQ subints

On 11/7/2012 12:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: I think you need to elaborate what this is. Sorry. Considering the number of use /126 or /127 on P2P links responses I got, I obviously didn't explain myself very well. My aim here is to allow CPE, or CPE-connected devices to pull IPs via

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switch Software Release 4.2(1)SV1(5.2) Virtual Security Gateway Bypass Issue

On 07/11/2012 16:11, Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team After the software upgrade, a bug in Software Release 4.2(1)SV1(5.2) could cause all the virtual Ethernet ports on the Virtual Ethernet Modules (VEM) of the Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switch to stay in No-Policy

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 SLAAC on P2P or QinQ subints

Hi, On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:11:46AM -0700, Tim Densmore wrote: Currently for most v4 DSL subscribers, we use ip unnumbered pointing towards a loopback that functions as the gateway and use DHCP or host routes or radius to assign IPs. This config appears impossible using v6, since

Re: [c-nsp] Preserving CoS with xconnect on ME3600X

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I've gone ahead and created some policy-maps on the 3600X that will set the correct qos-group and imposition exp values so that I'm able to preserve the original CoS markings in both directions. Jose On 11/6/2012 4:39 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: Hi, On 7

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 SLAAC on P2P or QinQ subints

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Densmore Sent: mercoledì 7 novembre 2012 17:12 To: Cisco NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 SLAAC on P2P or QinQ subints On 11/7/2012 12:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson

[c-nsp] 6506-E vs 7606-S

Other than the form factor difference between these two chassis, is there any particular reason to select one over the other? Planning on running 2 VS-S2T-10G-XL sups, and 2 WS-6908-10G-2T 8 port 10G cards.. Full BGP routes to two peers.. Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com

[c-nsp] Could you remove me from the mailing list?

Sorry, having a hard time finding the link to remove. Messages are too frequent. -- *Chris Wiggins * ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Could you remove me from the mailing list?

It's at the bottom of every email sent from this list... https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Chris Wiggins christopher.b.wigg...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, having a hard time finding the link to remove. Messages are too frequent. -- *Chris Wiggins

Re: [c-nsp] Could you remove me from the mailing list?

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Chris Wiggins christopher.b.wigg...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, having a hard time finding the link to remove. Messages are too frequent. Many list servers will include instructions to unsubscribe in the email headers. Example for this list: List-Unsubscribe:

Re: [c-nsp] 6506-E vs 7606-S

On 07/11/2012 20:09, Peter Kranz wrote: Other than the form factor difference between these two chassis, is there any particular reason to select one over the other? Planning on running 2 VS-S2T-10G-XL sups, and 2 WS-6908-10G-2T 8 port 10G cards.. Full BGP routes to two peers.. if this is a

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

Hi, I've seen ISSU disrupting data-forwarding during a CPoC in 2011 but this was all related to a bug. I have recently updated 4 N7k's from 5.2(3) to 5.2(5) without any problem! Regards dirk On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tim Stevenson tstev...@cisco.com wrote: At 06:05 AM 11/7/2012, Pete

[c-nsp] 4500 Sup 6/6e/7/7e

Anyone have experience with this model in a voice (non-cisco) deployment? With the IOS MQC style QoS config, I'm expecting I'll have to define an LLQ egress on every uplink and shared data/voice port where I might have otherwise configured priority queue out and put my voice traffic into the

Re: [c-nsp] 6506-E vs 7606-S

Besides which way the slots go? :) Is the sup 2t officilly suported in the 7600 now? I know there have been rumors and promises, but has it been announced? I must have missd it Full circle from split to reconvergence, what a waste. Brian Inviato da iPad Il giorno 07/nov/2012, alle ore 22:12,

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

While doing some more testing this aft I also removed the sup from slot 5 and did a disruptive single sup ISSU upgrade from 5.1(5) to 5.2(7) on the slot 6 sup without issues. -Charles On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:48:35PM +, Antonio Soares wrote: Great, I must confess that I searched a lot and

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7K NX-OS Upgrade

Hi Charles, I thought redundant sup is required for ISSU? Regards, Alexander Lim On 8 Nov, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Charles Spurgeon c.spurg...@austin.utexas.edu wrote: While doing some more testing this aft I also removed the sup from slot 5 and did a disruptive single sup ISSU upgrade from

[c-nsp] 7200VXR G2 performance

Hi All, One of our customer's border router which is G2 is having a lot of load on it. We observe packet loss when throughput reaches to maximum. Any suggestion how can we lower the load or increase the power of the router. We need a temporary solution for a couple of weeks. Besides, I think

Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR G2 performance

Hi Andrew, I think i have used the wrong term power over here. The whole idea is how to use the router's resources well. What can i do to bring cpu and memory utilization of router down? *Ali Sumsam CCIE* *Network Engineer - Level 3* eintellego Pty Ltd a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net

Re: [c-nsp] 6506-E vs 7606-S

I heard that coming too. Cisco must be joking with these two platforms... We are already looking at alternatives on the J side. -- Tassos Brian Turnbow wrote on 7/11/2012 23:51: Besides which way the slots go? :) Is the sup 2t officilly suported in the 7600 now? I know there have been rumors