On 11/01/2013 03:02, "Dhamija Amit" wrote:
>Hi
>
>I would like to know about Link state Periodic SPF's , I have seen in
>Cisco IOS-XR and Juniper M/T -Series ( Junos) by default Periodic SPF
>runs every 15 minutes.
>
>Going to concept of SPF whenever there is change in topology router runs
>SP
> I would like to know about Link state Periodic SPF's , I have seen in Cisco
> IOS-XR and Juniper M/T -Series ( Junos) by default Periodic SPF runs every 15
> minutes.
>
> Going to concept of SPF whenever there is change in topology router runs SPF
> based on SPF interval configured. Also when
Hi
I would like to know about Link state Periodic SPF's , I have seen in Cisco
IOS-XR and Juniper M/T -Series ( Junos) by default Periodic SPF runs every 15
minutes.
Going to concept of SPF whenever there is change in topology router runs SPF
based on SPF interval configured. Also when LSP/LS
I can verify a generic one works on SUP720-3b running 12.2(33)SRE
But not on any of the linecards we have, like 6724-sfp.
This one's not in use.
core-1#sh int gi8/1 transceiver
Transceiver monitoring is disabled for all interfaces.
ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not available),
We have a few supervisors in our repair bin that keep showing up with
the error "HW indicate it is sup3, but idprom is not" Has anyone ran
across this error before? I could not find any records of it online.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puc
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
I guess I should have phrased my question a little better. Given that
the existing 6509's we have are 6+ year old chassis' and have soon to be
End of Life Sup's (within 18 months), opinion based, is it justifiable
to replace the sup's and line cards,
We have 7203BXL sup's currently, however these switches we think were put in
early 2005. We definitely will have a large amount of 10gbit coming soon and
with Cisco announcing that the 7203BXL EOL announcement, that means we want to
be off them by end of SW Maintenance Date (Feb/11/2014).
Ad
Hi,
I currently plan on using a 7204VXR with an NPE-G1 at an event for NAT
only and wonder what performance I could get out of it.
Common to both secarios I am thinking about is the following:
Two active intefaces (on the NPE): one to the ISP and one the core
switch (proably GBICs on both).
A few
Hello!
Thanks for you response.
As I know MSTP does not send MSTI's information in separate BPDUs, this
information is piggybacked into the IST's BPDUs using special M-Record
fields.
They are all send UNTAGGED.
They may be filtered (bpdufilter enable) or Carrier-Eqiupment may be
configured no
Which Sups? I believe the Sup2T needs an E chassis, but the 720 will work
with older ones. The 720s are supported for 2 more years FYI. The other
modules might be nearing end of SW support though, depending on what you
have...
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.neth
The Nexus5k and fabric extenders really aren't that much coin if you're
interested in basic 10gig connectivity. The extenders were ~4500 refurb,
IIRC, and the units themselves ~11k refurb, all smartnet eligible.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> We are currently looking
We are currently looking at replacing our datacenter core. Currently we have 2
6509-NEB-A's in core, and we are trying to weigh options on either upgrading
sup's line cards to go 10gbit or looking at Nexus gear. Obviously there is a
little bit of dollar pain when even thinking nexus so I am tr
Hello!
Thanks for you response.
As I know MSTP does not send MSTI’s information in separate BPDUs, this
information is piggybacked into the IST’s BPDUs using special M-Record
fields.
So, I can have multiple MSTI or one with whole vlan range (1-4096) no
matter. Also we not planned to use some loa
>
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Richard Clayton
> wrote:
>
> > I am currently running SIP ALG on 1000 devices without any problems,
> a mixture of 857 and 887VA-M. I originally had a problem with the
> 887VA-M but a bug fix was released after I raised a TAC case.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Sledge
>
>
On Jan 10, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Richard Clayton wrote:
> I am currently running SIP ALG on 1000 devices without any problems, a
> mixture of 857 and 887VA-M. I originally had a problem with the 887VA-M but
> a bug fix was released after I raised a TAC case.
>
> Cheers
> Sledge
The challenge I
I am currently running SIP ALG on 1000 devices without any problems, a
mixture of 857 and 887VA-M. I originally had a problem with the 887VA-M
but a bug fix was released after I raised a TAC case.
Cheers
Sledge
On 9 January 2013 00:12, Jared Mauch wrote:
> IOS automatically does SIP-ALG when d
Hi,
well, I am not aware of any plans to implement ISIS NSR which would sync
LSPDB to standby in IOS or IOS-XR, something which would not need the CSNP
to rebuild the LSDB upon failover.
So don't think we can fix this on our side if your ERX doesn't support the
official "nsf ietf". Maybe you can
--- On Thu, 1/10/13, Dhamija Amit wrote:
> From: Dhamija Amit
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Difference between ISIS NSR and ISIS NSF Cisco-Style
> To: "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)"
> Date: Thursday, January 10, 2013, 12:32 PM
> Hi Oli,
>
> Many Thanks for your prompt response.
>
> We have one int
>I would like to know the difference between actuall ISIS NSR and ISIS NSF
>cisco style.
>
>Most documentation says they are same , however thereare some differences
>also and it's not real NSR. Also i have seen in some packet sniffer in
>cisco style cisco router sends a dummy special CSNP pac
On 01/10/2013 11:24 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Hello.
CSCsb70129 means an ERSPAN session which is in administrative shutdown
("shutdown" issued in the ERSPAN config), might start to ERSPAN traffic
even though the config says otherwise. Triggers might be that the source
port specified in the
On 01/10/2013 11:15 AM, Tóth András wrote:
According to Gigabit Transceiver Matrix, DOM is not supported for
SX/LH/ZX modules on 6500, neither Sup720 nor Sup2T nor 6824/6848
linecards.
I guess that's not terribly surprising given the 6848 is just a 6748
with a DFC4; I doubt they rev'd the line
Hi
I would like to know the difference between actuall ISIS NSR and ISIS NSF cisco
style.
Most documentation says they are same , however thereare some differences also
and it's not real NSR. Also i have seen in some packet sniffer in cisco style
cisco router sends a dummy special
Hello.
CSCsb70129 means an ERSPAN session which is in administrative shutdown
("shutdown" issued in the ERSPAN config), might start to ERSPAN traffic
even though the config says otherwise. Triggers might be that the source
port specified in the ERSPAN config goes down and comes up again (ther
According to Gigabit Transceiver Matrix, DOM is not supported for SX/LH/ZX
modules on 6500, neither Sup720 nor Sup2T nor 6824/6848 linecards.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.pdf
Best regards,
Andras
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:22
Dears ,
I am trying to load balance on destination port with SPAN and VACL ,
Below the configuration :
interface GigabitEthernet9/24
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switchport capture
interface GigabitEthernet9/46
switchport
switchpo
> Do you use max-path eigbp to ignore the IGP metric to the next-hop/egress
PE and to loadshare across these paths? Or do you actually have the
requirement to load-share across a direct/ebgp and a remote PE path?
Well it's both actually, in order to take care of all scenarios upfront.
It's mostl
26 matches
Mail list logo
