Hi I have many international links active and each link is exported with
certain prefixMy question is should the outbound traffic go through the same
link as well , symmetrical ? or it's not an issue to have the export from a
link and the import for the same prefix from another one ?
Thanks
Can anyone tell me if Cisco F2/F2e line modules can run Fabricpath and L3
(SVI's) on the same line module. Is it line rate as well or does it proxy
through an ASIC burning ports, etc. Is an M1 module required?
Someone has told me it cannot, but I believe it can. Are there any
limitations with it?
Well, I'm doing it, so I guess it can.
And F2 modules must be in a VDC by themselves, so no M1 could possibly be
involved.
Paul Lustgraafgr...@iastate.edu
Change is inevitable. Progress is not.
Network Engineer, Iowa State University IT Services
Okay great, that is what I thought.. Seems like a simple feature to miss.
Do you know if there are any performance limitations with it? Like could
internal ports be burned for routing efforts? It seems that many companies
have problems with the TRILL header and can't do SVI natively like we can
At 10:12 AM 3/21/2013 Thursday, Chris Evans announced:
Okay great, that is what I thought.. Seems like a simple feature to miss.
Do you know if there are any performance limitations with it?
F2/E can generally do L2 L3 at equal rate.
Like could
internal ports be burned for routing
Hello,
I need to know what exactly constitutes a hit on an access-list. I was doing
some troubleshooting and I did not get the expected results. I thought the
first packet to match would be equal but it looks like it may require a 3-way
handshake.
I have an extended access-list in place
My guess is it is default ACL logging rate limiting.
I'd suggest taking off the log keyword and looking at the counts in show
access-list
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:57 PM, false jct...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
I need to know what exactly constitutes a hit on an access-list. I was
doing
So this should be fun; I need to swich from HSRP to
VRRP to facilitate bringing in a second vendor's
hardware to interoperate. We run ipv4 and
ipv6 (static assignments) and the VLANs are a mix
of physical servers along with vmware guests on
Cisco UCS with the fabric interconnects in end-host
Hello Everyone,
We are rolling out IPV6 services to our xdsl users and I am looking for an
answer regarding esr 10ks and ipv6( Pre2s running 12.2(33)SB13).
It works :-) , but we have been unable to find a way to activate ipv6 without
creating a full virtual access interface.
I've been looking
Hi Everyone,
I have been asked to look into setting up per vlan bandwidth limiting with
burst. I was sent this link and was wondering about what everyone else
does.
http://ccietobe.blogspot.com/2009/02/3560-qos-per-port-per-vlan-policing.html
Basically we want to limit a vlan network for
Just a general question for the group. Has there been announcements of Cisco
supporting BGP Flowspec in IPV4 and IPV6 on any of their platforms? My
understanding is that it is not yet supported but wondered if there was any
update to this.
Thanks
Scott
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Scott Granados wrote:
Just a general question for the group. Has there been announcements of
Cisco supporting BGP Flowspec in IPV4 and IPV6 on any of their
platforms? My understanding is that it is not yet supported but
wondered if there was any update to this.
The
Hi,
We're trying to implement VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T (VSS) as
described in
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-663645.html#wp9000139
and constantly failing. It seems so simple: set up a VSS, use LACP or PAgP
port-channels to
I have 7K with fabricpath, SVI's, and routed interfaces... The box is purely
F2 linecards... I'm not aware of limitations and I have not had any problems
with it thus far...
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hi,
Sorry - too early in the morning - ignore my last post - thought you were
referring to VSS on Sup2T - didnt see the VPLS.
:(
Yeah, the VSS is no problem. VSL links on the Sup2t and it was up and running
in minutes. The VPLS code is the buggy part it seems :-(
Cheers,
Sander
On 21/03/2013 18:14, David Hubbard wrote:
So this should be fun; I need to swich from HSRP to
VRRP to facilitate bringing in a second vendor's
hardware to interoperate. We run ipv4 and
ipv6 (static assignments) and the VLANs are a mix
of physical servers along with vmware guests on
Cisco
Steffann,
What pay of VPLS doesn't work?
Do you see the PW's coming up? LDP? MAC learning?
If you share some configs and show command outputs, maybe we can figure it
out...
Arie
Original message
From: Sander Steffann san...@steffann.nl
Date:
To: Andrew Miehs
Sorry - too early in the morning - ignore my last post - thought you were
referring to VSS on Sup2T - didnt see the VPLS.
:(
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
Hi Sander,
It definitely works. A colleague of mine installed one two weeks ago.
I would
On 21/03/2013 09:41, M K wrote:
Hi I have many international links active and each link is exported with
certain prefixMy question is should the outbound traffic go through the
same link as well , symmetrical ? or it's not an issue to have the
export from a link and the import for the same
Hi Arie,
What pay of VPLS doesn't work?
Do you see the PW's coming up? LDP? MAC learning?
MAC learning was broken on X6704 but seems to work with X6908. Forwarding seems
to break everywhere when the traffic has to go over the VSL.
If you share some configs and show command outputs, maybe
I perhaps didn't do as much reading regarding swapping HSRP for VRRP.
Nothing broke, Server 2008 and 2003 environment with some Novell. And
a few hundred XP/Win7 users.
That was on an all IPv4 network though.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:14 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
On 21/03/2013 20:13, Alex Pressé wrote:
Nothing broke, Server 2008 and 2003 environment with some Novell. And
a few hundred XP/Win7 users.
it won't break; there will just be a changeover period where some of the
client boxes will not know about the new VRRP mac address of the default
gateway,
Hi Sander,
It definitely works. A colleague of mine installed one two weeks ago.
I would recommend that you use both ports on the supervisor rather than on
a line card for the VSL (Link).
The 6908 should work for VSL, the 6704 won't - but it can be used for other
traffic.
Regards
Andrew
On
Hi,
Just thought Id provide an update to this - Have been dealing with TAC, and the
%EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2 error appears to be a cosmetic bug, and the portchan +
member Ints being down is expected until you issue switch convert mode
virtual on both switches, then once the switches reboot, the
24 matches
Mail list logo
