Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map

Hi Adam, ME does not support ACL match in the egress policy and there is no plan to support it. However you can use the workaround "ACLs can be matched in ingress policies and set qos-group. The qos-group can be matched in egress policies". Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: ME3600X should come up with a single power supply. However dual supply is > recommended. > I can test again with current IOS, but I am 100% positive that used to be the case. The reason given in the docs was that the fans are built int

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

Hi Richard, Please open a case and send me the number so that I can work with engineering to understand the possibility of implementing it on our platform. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service P

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > ME3600X does send out traps. Correct. But receiving traps means monitoring that traps are received and processed, sending test traps, etc. This is why we don't use traps for anything. Polling means we _know_ the data is current. If

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

On 3-Oct-13, at 11:00 , Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 03/10/2013 16:16, quinn snyder wrote: >> on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram >> and proc). > > It shouldn't need that much (although the csr1000v's insane compute > requirements are a complete mystery to me) -

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

On 03/10/2013 16:16, quinn snyder wrote: > on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram > and proc). It shouldn't need that much (although the csr1000v's insane compute requirements are a complete mystery to me) - anyway, ram and cpu are both cheap resources these days.

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

Nobody said free. Just speculated. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Rati Berikaant Jokhadze wrote: > I dont remember any product from cisco for free :-) > > > On 10/03/2013 07:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > >> It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on >> this stuff.

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

I dont remember any product from cisco for free :-) On 10/03/2013 07:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Ngu

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

On 03 Oct 2013, at 17:18, quinn snyder wrote: >> On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:12, "Aaron" wrote: > >> I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). >> XRv same as VIRL ? > > xrvr == xr within virl. > > doesn't ncs run virtualized xr (xrv)? Yes it does. -- "There's no

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

On 03 Oct 2013, at 17:12, Aaron wrote: > VIRL sounds awesome. > > I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). > XRv same as VIRL ? VIRL is a platform for virtualized software packages. vIOS, XRv, CSR 1000v and so on are examples of such packages. -- "There's no

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

Free? are you sure? On 10/03/2013 07:02 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > This should be free. > > On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux wrote: > > > I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on > > VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Hi Adam, L2PT Tunneling as well as L2PT Forward are supported on ME platforms but recommended is L2PT Forward. L2PT tunneling changes the destination mac address to well known Cisco mac address and can only work with remote devices supporting L2PT tunneling. It does not interoperate with non Cis

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

Did someone get a chance to download whatever under XRv? it's "page not available" currently. If i remember correctly, my SE said you have to pay for it. Beta is going right now and the list is long i was told. You have a better chance of getting it from being leaked out then get on the beta. Was

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Hi Adam, I will get back to the team with the resolution update. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile:

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

> On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:12, "Aaron" wrote: > I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). > XRv same as VIRL ? xrvr == xr within virl. doesn't ncs run virtualized xr (xrv)? q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

Oh yeah ! it will be very sweet Aaron From: Oliver Garraux [mailto:oli...@g.garraux.net] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:55 AM To: Lane Wigley (lwigley) Cc: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) I will be really really interested to see what the

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram and proc). large scale networks will require large pools of resources. the software may be free -- but running it may not be if you're short on servers. q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and bre

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

VIRL sounds awesome. I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). XRv same as VIRL ? Aaron -Original Message- From: Lane Wigley (lwigley) [mailto:lwig...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:18 AM To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Nguyen wrote: > Seriously doubt that it would be free. > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux wrote: > I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on > VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with > XR and NX-OS in the lab. > > Oliver > > ---

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitt

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

[c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)

What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net

[c-nsp] c-nsp] VACL limitation in 6509

Dears , After a long case discussed with Cisco TAC , this is the final configuration that make a VACL capture work successfully: vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 1356,1357,1351, vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 3737, interface GigabitEthernet9/23 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 131, Issue 6

Hi ! Thank you so much for your support Oliver Boehmer & Tony. I have tried to convert using ACL permit (not deny) and it's okay. Thanks and Best Regards. Nam On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:54 PM, wrote: > Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to > cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > To subsc

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Hi Pshem, I see so the "tunnel feature/keyword" basically applies everywhere where the BPDUs have to traverse (or be tunneled through) a native L2 switched network in order to get to the desired device/l2pt endpoint. adam -Original Message- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.co

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Hi Adam, With 'forward' the ethernet packets are forwarded 'as-is' through the MPLS topology. With 'tunnel' the destination MAC address gets rewritten to a 'special' multicast MAC addresses, the remote end of the 'tunnel' restores the original MAC address. Forward can be used if both customer de

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Hi Waris, So on ME3800 I read the l2pt tunnel is not supported on EFPs with PW/xconnect configured on them, though IOS will let you enter the command with no complains. So to work around this I should be using l2pt forward instead right? Is there actually a difference in function of these two co

Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

Nam, as Tony already said, "deny" clauses are not supported in QoS classification ACLs on this linecard. So you need to change your qos semantic. Assuming deny was supported, your current qos policy semantic looks like if( destination is not in (1.52.x.x, etc.) ) then police to 1 mbps else p