On 18/Mar/15 09:57, Ulrik Ivers wrote:
Hi,
Yes, agree that the new ASR920 is the one you should be looking at.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/datasheet-c78-733397.html
If you go with the ASR-920-24SZ-IM you can add a
On 18/Mar/15 10:32, Gregor Jeker wrote:
It does, at least if redundant uplinks are a requirement.
Well, an east-west ring takes care of that.
If you're going to build 4x diverse fibre paths, that will be expensive.
Similarly, if you have 2x diverse fibre paths that both go down, you
have
On Mar 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
What I want is an ASR920 with 40x or 48x ports, with 4x 10Gbps SFP+ uplinks,
all line rate.
Then how about an ASR9001?
--
Robert
inoc.net!rblayzor
http://inoc.net/
___
Hi,
Yes, agree that the new ASR920 is the one you should be looking at.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/datasheet-c78-733397.html
If you go with the ASR-920-24SZ-IM you can add a 2-port 10G interface card to
get 6x10G on the
From the cisco netflow v9 guide:
NDE v9 records for IPv6 do not contain Autonomous System (AS) numbers and
prefix length
information.
Is this still the case? my src and dst AS ipv6 flow fields from my c7600 are 0.
Is there some solution?
Thanks, Erik
On 18/Mar/15 10:57, Gustav UHLANDER wrote:
Hello.
We have one ASR920 that we are playing with also.
It's a rather nice box we like the shallow depth but the CPU is pretty weak and
the software feels rather incomplete.
We would also like BGP advertised VPLS which we haven't been able to get
On Mar 18, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have Cisco ASR 903 with two RSPs
When I console to one for the RSPs , i am in the rommon mode
When I try to browse for the bootflash , I get the below message
rommon 1 dir bootflash:
ERROR:: PRSSTAT.BREN is NOT
On 18/03/15 08:59, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
A 24-port unit with 4x 10Gbps uplinks makes no sense whatsoever.
It does, at least if redundant uplinks are a requirement. I had a ASR920
(24xSFP Version) in my hands recently, from tech perspective it really looks
great, even if the
Dear colleagues,
Recently I have enabled a BGP session with the LINX route servers (London). The
problem is that I have noticed that my router is learning routes from the route
server very slow. I have disabled the command bgp enforce-first-as in order
to learn the routes and the route-policy
Dear colleagues,
We have fixed this issue by clearing the BGP session on the route server.
Anyway, thanks!
Best regards,
Jordi
From: jordimagr...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:14:12 +0100
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR9001 issues with route learning from
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
What I want is an ASR920 with 40x or 48x ports, with 4x 10Gbps SFP+
uplinks, all line rate.
A 24-port unit with 4x 10Gbps uplinks makes no sense whatsoever.
Mark.
___
On 18/Mar/15 12:19, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Then how about an ASR9001?
Too big, too pricey.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 18/Mar/15 14:17, Tim Durack wrote:
Throw in some PoE and you've got a very interesting box. It isn't just
the SP market that needs to eliminate STP :-)
They'll have to build a separate box for that, otherwise my price will
be unreasonably inflated :-).
Good to hear the enterprise
Hey everyone!
I have a couple of datacenters that run PfR between two providers per
datacenter that simply load balances outbound traffic between two ASRs. We're
looking at possibly removing one provider at each location and load balancing
traffic between datacenters. I have redundant
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:47:22AM +0100, Erik Klaassen wrote:
From the cisco netflow v9 guide:
NDE v9 records for IPv6 do not contain Autonomous System (AS) numbers and
prefix length
information.
Is this still the case? my src and dst AS ipv6 flow fields from my c7600 are
0.
Is there
Thanks Mark - So where is the ASR902 positioned vs ME3800 + ASR920 ?
Obviously the 902 is chassis-based...so more flexibility with port choice(If
you need that)
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:49:00 +0200
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs
A 24-port unit with 4x 10Gbps uplinks makes no sense
whatsoever.
I can make sense when you have 1 or 2 customers that you
want to connect with 10Gbit (of course, you will have to think
about uplink bandwidth as well, but thats besides the point).
On Mar 18, 2015, at 12:50, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
I guess these boxes make sense in legacy RAN networks, where you may need a
mix-and-match of old interfaces that you can uplink into your MPLS core.
I suppose one could use them as an edge router where low-speed
On 18/Mar/15 22:47, quinn snyder wrote:
we’re seeing a larger uptake of these boxen in locations/customer
environments were migration from tdm/serial to ethernet is occurring.
think legacy monitoring systems wherein sonet/scada was used and
there is a requirement/desire to replace gear
Hi,
That is because when you increase an OSPF cost on the R2 interface you are
essentially telling the router to advertise LSAs out that interface using this
higher cost 100.
So to the neighbouring router R3 the link to R2 over which it received the LSAs
will appear with higher cost 100.
That
Hi
I have Cisco ASR 903 with two RSPs
When I console to one for the RSPs , i am in the rommon mode
When I try to browse for the bootflash , I get the below message
rommon 1 dir bootflash:
ERROR:: PRSSTAT.BREN is NOT set. Data xfr incomplete
FAILURE
prsstat ff8d0206 not ESDHC_PRSSTAT_BREN i=
Hi Guys,
Looking at both of these boxes to terminate 10Gb Aggs and a bunch of either VRF
or VPLS tails...3800X looks to support more VRF's(2000 instances) vs 128 on the
ASR902...but we only need a 2 or 3, just a heap of subints/vlan ints in the
same vrf, but the 902 looks to be able to give me
On 18/Mar/15 09:37, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Guys,
Looking at both of these boxes to terminate 10Gb Aggs and a bunch of either VRF
or VPLS tails...3800X looks to support more VRF's(2000 instances) vs 128 on the
ASR902...but we only need a 2 or 3, just a heap of subints/vlan ints in the
same
Hi Adam,
ASR920 numbers:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/models-comparison.html
Cheers
From: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk
To: mark.ti...@seacom.mu; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:26:01 +
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
Hi Lukas,
That is an interesting feature
I would expect the same behavior in both cases i.e. with per-vrf label
the router pops the VPN label and founds a packet with TTL 1 decreases
and sends to CE.
And in case of the per-NH label the packet should be switched out the
egress
Mark Tinka
Sent: 18 March 2015 08:00
What I want is an ASR920 with 40x or 48x ports, with 4x 10Gbps SFP+
uplinks, all line rate.
And what about ASR903
with 2x RSP2A (2x for redundancy you won't get with ASR920)
and 2x 2-Port 10GE XFP/SFP+ Module (2x for redundancy you won't get with
Hi Mohammad,
Try to remove all line-cards and possibly backup RSP as well leaving just the
primary RSP in the chases and start the box.
Once the RSP is booted try to insert the second one.
And do the SW upgrade before you insert the interface cards - or you can
upgrade just the primary RSP and
On 19/Mar/15 03:14, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Hi Adam,
ASR920 numbers:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/models-comparison.html
Cisco should have at least doubled these numbers for the ASR920, coming
from the ME3600X/3800X.
I know
On 19/Mar/15 02:26, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
And what about ASR903
Too big :-).
1U is the sweet spot for me.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi Lukas,
That is an interesting feature
I would expect the same behaviour in both cases i.e. with per-vrf label the
router pops the VPN label and founds a packet with TTL 1 decreases and sends to
CE.
And in case of the per-NH label the packet should be switched out the egress
interface based
On 18/Mar/15 19:31, Lukas Tribus wrote:
I can make sense when you have 1 or 2 customers that you
want to connect with 10Gbit (of course, you will have to think
about uplink bandwidth as well, but thats besides the point).
Which is Cisco's thinking.
The problem with that is I want to be in a
On 18/Mar/15 20:21, CiscoNSP List wrote:
Thanks Mark - So where is the ASR902 positioned vs ME3800 + ASR920 ?
Obviously the 902 is chassis-based...so more flexibility with port
choice(If you need that)
For me, the ASR902 and ASR903 are not interesting because we're a purely
Ethernet
32 matches
Mail list logo
