Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

The BGP process does receive the updates. It also has its own version of the RIB. The IP RIB Update process handles the 'installed routes' and pushes things out to the CEF. Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbr...@viawest.com |

Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in point to point link on internet

On 22/06/16 21:32, Nick Cutting wrote: > That space also "should" be non-routable over the internet - I know a > few sneaky enterprises using it, - wasn’t that carved out for CGN? Correct - it was specifically ear marked for CGN, so as not to conflict with your customer's own use of RFC1918. It

Re: [c-nsp] asr920 - push two vlans

On 06/22/2016 11:50 AM, Aaron wrote: If IOS XE on the 920 is similar to IOS on ME3600 at least to the extent of efp (si) implementation then perhaps this will work (taken from my operational me3600) interface GigabitEthernet0/1 switchport trunk allowed vlan none switchport mode trunk

Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in point to point link on internet

That space also "should" be non-routable over the internet - I know a few sneaky enterprises using it, - wasn’t that carved out for CGN? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:19 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in point to point link on internet

This is new too me! never heard before. do we can use 100.64.0.0/16 on Point to point WAN link?? On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Brian Turnbow wrote: > Hi Satich, > > In your position I would consider using shared address space instead of > private address space. >

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 67xx DOM support

Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Is the lack of DOM on 67xx series 7600 cards still a thing? there was a brief period around SXF4 to SXF11 or so where it worked on hw 3.0 cards. Other than that, it was disabled in software. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

On 22/Jun/16 19:32, Mack McBride wrote: > My understanding is that on the 6500/7600 series the IP RIB Update process > also contains the prebuilt FIB to be pushed into CEF. > I may be wrong on that but I don't think so. BGP-SD definitely does not push > the routes into the IP RIB Update

Re: [c-nsp] asr920 - push two vlans

If IOS XE on the 920 is similar to IOS on ME3600 at least to the extent of efp (si) implementation then perhaps this will work (taken from my operational me3600) interface GigabitEthernet0/1 switchport trunk allowed vlan none switchport mode trunk mtu 9202 load-interval 30 speed

[c-nsp] asr920 - push two vlans

Hi, I have a gig ethernet port I want to accept untagged frames on, and push two vlans on for forwarding thru mpls. Of course, I also want to remove these tags and make the frames untagged when exiting the ethernet port. I am failing to see how to specify this, does anyone have a quick

Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

My understanding is that on the 6500/7600 series the IP RIB Update process also contains the prebuilt FIB to be pushed into CEF. I may be wrong on that but I don't think so. BGP-SD definitely does not push the routes into the IP RIB Update process. Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect |

Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

On 22/Jun/16 19:07, Mack McBride wrote: > > You may also want to put in Selective Route Download and rely on defaults for > routes that are fairly > distant from you network wise. Or just prune your table if that is an option. BGP-SD won't reduce the RIB memory tax, but it will certainly

Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

If BGP is holding that much memory I would verify 'soft-reconfiguration inbound' is not configured. It stores the update messages and is not efficient at deleting them. Then do a 'clear ip bgp *' to restart the process. A reboot may be in order. You may also want to put in Selective Route

[c-nsp] 7600 67xx DOM support

Is the lack of DOM on 67xx series 7600 cards still a thing? Are we up Dom Schitt’s creek unless we use SIP/SPA/ES+ cards, or is there anything else that works? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k - IPoE termination

Hi, > On 22/06/2016, at 11:39, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > > Hi, > > We're testing IPoE termination on ASR9ks and ran into a small, but annoying > issue. > Our subs will terminate on PW-Eth interfaces, that ultimately connect to a > L2 broadcast domain (access network, this is

Re: [c-nsp] Route processor memory at 99% on 720-3bxl

Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:01:13AM +0200, chiel wrote: > We got a 6500 with a 720-3bxl running > s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.151-2.SY7.bin. > > Devices is has to do some basic routing/switching with full BGP. > - 1x IPv4 full ebgp router with 585172 prefixes and a ibgp with 216827 >