Re: [c-nsp] Using MPLS PEs as gateways for access layer

2016-11-29 Thread Andrew Miehs
Hi Ryan, I did some work for a customer a few years back doing something very similar. Campus network, 2x 6500s as P routers, 12x 6500s running as PEs, each connected to both Ps. Access switches then connected directly to the PEs. The SVIs were hosted on the 6500 PEs. We use VSS for DCs where we

[c-nsp] Using MPLS PEs as gateways for access layer

2016-11-29 Thread Ryan L
Hey all, Apologies if this is a muppet question, but still getting my bearings with MPLS. Most L3VPN designs I've checked out don't really address this specific design... I've got a multi-tenant network that would either be done w/VRF-lite or L3VPN, but I don't have a CE router, per se. Is it so

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow on non-IP interfaces?

2016-11-29 Thread Chris Balmain
Yes – I should add, this is being done because unfortunately SNMP won’t work in this instance. On this platform (ASR1001-X), port-channel subinterface counters don’t work. There is a hardware limitation, according to TAC. From: Deny IP Any Any [mailto:denyipany...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 30

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
Be aware that the ROMMON has issues with cards >1G in many cases, 4G cards and larger might work once IOS has booted but not to boot from ROMMON, even if you format them and copy the image to them on the same supervisor. Kind regards, Sibbi Þann 29/11/16 19:55, ritaði "cisco-nsp on behalf of

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread Saku Ytti
On 29 November 2016 at 12:51, wrote: Hey, > So I formated a CF in another 6500, copied the IOS and tried to boot from > disk0 without luck. I tried erasing nvram and I even copied a boot image and > the IOS ROMMON image to the CF but I always got the same message: There are multiple incompat

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread Artem Viklenko
Some time ago I had to reuse old SUP32B which was not used for several years. I don't remember all details, but finally problem was fixed after replacing on-board batteries and very-very long process of loading IOS via serial console... The point was that nvram forgets all data every time the bor

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME1200 iCLI

2016-11-29 Thread Holger L
On Mon, November 28, 2016 20:54, Gregor Jeker wrote: > Hi Guys > We have also been working with a demo pair of those, intended as CPE for > some E-Line like services. From my side, I have never seen that weird CLI > everyone is talking about, I just started with the console and had a very > IOS-lik

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000

2016-11-29 Thread Mark Tinka
On 29/Nov/16 14:58, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: > How All, > Just had a ASr 1000 reload itself.. last reload reason saying Watchdog. > Trying to TFTP a file called Tracelog which I understand cisco tac will need > to troubleshoot. Having problems TFTP this file off the switch, can someone > ad

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000

2016-11-29 Thread Nick Hilliard
Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: > Just had a ASr 1000 reload itself.. last reload reason saying > Watchdog. Trying to TFTP a file called Tracelog which I understand > cisco tac will need to troubleshoot. Having problems TFTP this file > off the switch, can someone advise how to do this safely?. Thanks i

[c-nsp] ASR1000

2016-11-29 Thread Harry Hambi - Atos
How All, Just had a ASr 1000 reload itself.. last reload reason saying Watchdog. Trying to TFTP a file called Tracelog which I understand cisco tac will need to troubleshoot. Having problems TFTP this file off the switch, can someone advise how to do this safely?. Thanks in advance. Rgds Harr

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

2016-11-29 Thread adamv0025
> Daniel Serane > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:47 AM > > > Don't know what you mean be "lighter". ASR900 is a family with > > different RSP generations and different platforms, so its hard to make a > comparison. > > And all those different ASR900s with different RSPs have totally differen

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread listas
I can’t find IOS 12.2(17)SXF in Cisco. The older one is 12.2(33)… > El 29/11/2016, a las 12:22, lis...@cutre.net escribió: > > Hello > > In fact the CF also has a IOS (dir made in another router): > SUP-ROU2#dir flash: > Directory of flash:/ > > 2 -rw- 669827 Nov 29 2016 10:38:58 +

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread listas
Hello In fact the CF also has a IOS (dir made in another router): SUP-ROU2#dir flash: Directory of flash:/ 2 -rw- 669827 Nov 29 2016 10:38:58 +00:00 c6msfc3-rm2.srec.122-17r.SX7 1 -rw- 118713700 Nov 24 2016 15:11:42 +00:00 s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI13.bin

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread Painting, Stuart
Aside from it being a boot image rather than an IOS image, there is another issue. Can ROMMON 8.1(3) boot IOS 12.2(33)SXI at all? I thought you needed (CatOS) ROMMON 8.5.4... See if you can get your hands on an IOS 12.2(17)SXF image. You may have more luck booting it. -Original Message---

Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread Lukas Tribus
> So I formated a CF in another 6500, copied the IOS > and tried to boot from disk0 without luck. >From the outputs you provided, you did not copy an IOS image to disk0, but a boot image. Boot image present or not, you will need an IOS image. > I tried erasing nvram and I even copied a boot im

[c-nsp] Cat 6500/sup720 doesn't boot

2016-11-29 Thread listas
Hello all I got a Cat6504 with sup720 that supposely worked when it was dismounted (same company, another division) but it came without a CF. So I formated a CF in another 6500, copied the IOS and tried to boot from disk0 without luck. I tried erasing nvram and I even copied a boot image and th

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

2016-11-29 Thread Daniel Serane
> Don't know what you mean be "lighter". ASR900 is a family with different > RSP generations and different platforms, so its hard to make a comparison. And all those different ASR900s with different RSPs have totally different features? Is there a reasonable slide to show the major differences? So

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

2016-11-29 Thread Lukas Tribus
> > The NCS500x is a dumb, dumb switch. > > > > Its a cheap and fast-tracked Trident II+ implementation in IOS-XR. > > Which sounds extremely tempting, TBH :-) - sane OS, fast hardware. I see your point, but just because its IOS-XR doesn't mean its 9k-like IOS-XR. You can choose (today) between

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs NCS5000

2016-11-29 Thread Daniel Serane
Ok, so what I understood now is: - ASR920 is lighter version of ASR900 in terms of ASIC/TCAM and buffers - ASR920 and ASR900 have same control-plane, same features - NCS5000 is basically even more light, less features and less FIB space, just more bandwidth and IOX anything else to consider? thx