Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

Thanks ! I have the newest driver to try tomorrow. I have not tried windows on the 12SZ yet From: George Giannousopoulos [mailto:ggian...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 2:40 PM To: Nick Cutting Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB -

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

Hi, We also had some issues lately with the ASR900 family.. The ASR920-24SZ was working ok with the included USB cable, both on Windows and Linux The ASR903 refused to work with Linux-USB, but was working ok with Linux-RJ45, Windows-RJ45 and Windows-USB The ASR920-12SZ refused to work with

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

Fair enough! Yes I understand the difference between the USB-A port and the EIA USB port. I also would copy what I did physically and logically on the working one, to the non-working one. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

> On 5 Mar 2018, at 19:20, Nick Cutting wrote: > > I don’t think it cares what end is plugged in. > But I left it plugged in to my laptop when I moved it from , to 920-4 > (working) to the 920-12 not working so that shouldn’t matter. > > It only shows up once it is

Re: [c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

I don’t think it cares what end is plugged in. But I left it plugged in to my laptop when I moved it from , to 920-4 (working) to the 920-12 not working so that shouldn’t matter. It only shows up once it is connected to the router, as a USBModem device in unix style systems From: Chris Marget

[c-nsp] ASr-920 CONSOLE USB - USB

I cannot for the life of me get the USB - USB console port to work on the 12 port ASR920 It is running 3.18 - I see this because I can see text at boot time, but it will not let me type anything at all. The lead time at the moment on the EIA/232 converter is 75 days. This is what I used to

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

That's my recollection as well... IRB should be cef enabled on G2 On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 01:46 James Bensley wrote: > On 5 March 2018 at 08:42, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Arie Vayner wrote: > > > >> My gut feeling tells me the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

James Bensley wrote: I thought that IRB did use CEF on the ISR-G2s? Cheers, James. On software routers, even CEF enabled features do not compare well with the most optimal and optimized routing operation flows, which is essentially IP in Ethernet interface, un-encapsulated, unencumbered

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

> Curtis Piehler > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2018 3:51 AM > > I presume this is supported in IOS-XR but just making sure. > > A network across the country is split up into multiple regions. Each region > housing two RRs where the local region clients peer with them. > Instead of full meshing

Re: [c-nsp] ISIS Fast Convergence (ASR920?)

> > SPF timers is generally a design decision, so the values above are just > reflecting different design approaches: Choosing an initial wait of 1ms (the > latter settings, i.e. spf-interval 5 1 50) tunes the network for optimal reaction > for link failures, so routers will

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

On 5 March 2018 at 08:42, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Arie Vayner wrote: > >> My gut feeling tells me the performance will be the same for irb and >> regular routing. These are software routers, so the performance depends on >> how many and which features you

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Arie Vayner wrote: My gut feeling tells me the performance will be the same for irb and regular routing. These are software routers, so the performance depends on how many and which features you enable. There is a huge performance difference (at least in older routers and