Re: [c-nsp] ASA 5505 SSH

general-keys -- Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] l2tp xconnect problem with packets 1430

! interface Loopback0 ip address 10.0.13.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 no ip address duplex auto speed auto no cdp enable xconnect 10.0.13.1 1 pw-class pwubfc -- Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] l2tp xconnect problem with packets 1430

. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] smaller/older image for 2924xl

Can anybody point me at the location on Cisco's web site for the older firmware images for a 2924XL switch? I've got a switch with only 4 MB of RAM, but the only release that I can find so far on their site requires 8 MB of RAM. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp

[c-nsp] secondary addresses on 3524

I've got a cisco 3524 running IOS 12.0 which accepts 'ip x.x.x.x y.y.y.y secondary' on its vlan interface but the command appears to be ignored. Anyone know if secondary addresses are supported on this switch? Online docs seem to suggest so but maybe 12.0 is too old? -- Antonio Querubin e

Re: [c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

...? Apparently, the bia address really isn't bia on that particular model :) Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

ethernet :) I did make up a random mac though I'm not sure if certain bits must be turned on or off. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

On Wed, 11 May 2011, Christopher Pilkington wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.org wrote: Apparently, the bia address really isn't bia on that particular model :) Wouldn't a missing hardware MAC be indicative of a corrupt NVRAM or similar? It may have

Re: [c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

On Wed, 11 May 2011, Bill Blackford wrote: Have you tried: snmpwalk -Os -c public_string -v2c 1720_IP ifPhysAddress All that does is return the manually set address. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

On Wed, 11 May 2011, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 05:58 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote: I did make up a random mac though I'm not sure if certain bits must be turned on or off. If you set the locally administered bit (e.g. 02xx..) you wouldn't step on anyones toes

[c-nsp] where is mac address for a 1720?

any hints of where it might be. Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Bonded T3 Bandwidth issue

? Antonio Querubin e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

that would reliably allow web browsing. One would think that 1496 or 1492 would do the trick but 1492 didn't make a difference. There was some useability at 1491. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

am interested in what kind of router are terminating your Q-in-Q vlan ? /off It's a 7206VXR running IOS 12.4. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

is 1500. So I'm still wondering why (according to the carrier doing the testing): - Setting our sub-interface IPv4 mtu to 1490 works but 1492 does not - IPv6 isn't affected Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] q-in-q mtu

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Daniel Lacey wrote: Isn't 1490 the magic MTU for PPPoE? Perhaps. But this is supposed to be a layer 2 connection via ethernet from us to the customer. PPPoE isn't in use. Just some switches and q-in-q in between. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t

Re: [c-nsp] Blocking IPv6 on WiSM?

those effects: http://ipv6hawaii.org/?p=143 Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

with OSPF. How do you know you don't have some RAM going BAD? Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] HSRP, and the router on the other side...

traffic to hosts in the 10.10.10.0/24 net? Use the static routes to the VRRP address for your hosts. Run a dynamic routing protocol between your routers that can do multi-path load-balancing. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net

Re: [c-nsp] Purposed of uRPF's allow-default Option?

'allow-default' on your upstream interface that you point your default route to. Ie. if you set your default-route at a particular interface or IP address, then you add urpf 'allow-default' on the interface that leads to your upstream gateway. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t

Re: [c-nsp] Purposed of uRPF's allow-default Option?

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Antonio Querubin wrote: Yes but that's not the interface where you would apply it. You apply ^ necessarilly 'allow-default' on your upstream interface that you point your default route to. Ie. if you set your default-route

Re: [c-nsp] Renumber of DSL.

. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question

on what I'm doing wrong? Use BVI's, not loopbacks. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] mlppp vs multipath bgp on NM-4T

of the links? Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast on PPP

You don't need PIM to do multicast over PPP. Many dialup/terminal servers that support multicast do so using some form of IGMP proxy. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.netHi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:44:08PM +0530, Vikas Sharma wrote: Does anyone has implemented

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast on PPP

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, (top-posting really sucks). For some reason alpine turned your post into an 'attachment' - not quite the same as top-posting. On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:26:23AM -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote: You don't need PIM to do multicast over PPP. Many

[c-nsp] 7206VXR NPE for ~1000 RBE interfaces

I'm researching upgrading a 7206VXR to handle about 1000 RBE interfaces off of either 2 T3 or 1 OC3 ATM line. Anybody got any recommendations on which NPE would handle this scenario? Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF not propagating - But for only one route...?

route 10.95.18.0 255.255.255.0 10.95.11.9 ! this is the problem route Have you tried 'redistribute static subnets'? -- Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] RS232 to TCP/IP

link? -- Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] RS232 to TCP/IP

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Antonio Querubin wrote: Can't you just run PPP (without a modem) over the serial link? That requires a non-trivial amount of compute power free on the PC. Perhaps if you were using a software-driven modem or running an extremely high-speed

Re: [c-nsp] RS232 to TCP/IP

Also, checkout these from Black Box: http://www.blackbox.com/Store/Detail.aspx/10-100-Terminal-Servers-DB25-Male/LES4012A Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

[c-nsp] intermittent 'igmp query-interval 125'

seconds. Anyone know why this would be happening? Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite Multicast question

when it comes to mcast) Do you have an RP on the right-hand-side of your diagram and do you have MSDP peering running between the left and right to distribute source info? Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] TCP behavior under strict CAR rate-limiting

the following: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd8.html In your case, if your target rate-limit is 1000, then 1875000 and 375 are what you probably should be using for the burst. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast tryout

. Pre-compiled windows exe are also there. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IP blocks from Asian RIRs?

it up as much as possible in amongst the rest of us. It would be easier to block by ASN and simply not accept the prefixes at the border. It's a bit extreme but certainly doable and requires less work by the routers. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco noob -- design guidance request

. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] support for 128-bit IPv6 bgp peers?

similiar IPv6 addresses out of the same /32 IPv6 netblock. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] sub-interface inheritance of main interface properties

-interface. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Cables

a bad crimp rather than bad 'cable'. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Cables

On Sun, 27 May 2007, Antonio Querubin wrote: deal with such issues. For short jumper connections between equipment where the cable does not go into any plenum, RG-59/62 works fine. Oops, that should be RG-59 / RG-6. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] routing v6 on a bvi?

into the same problem. See CSCej50923 for more info. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] CPU load on 7206 with 1200 DSL users

data so that can drive the CPU load up a notch. Each end-site would be provisioned on a separate subnet/interface with uRPF enabled. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman