I'll second on that BGP-SD we use it everywhere we deploy them and works like a
champ!
I'll also second the weakness of netflow using the video profile and the SFP
issues after upgrade(s). Not so cool..
From: cisco-nsp on
I use T50 for these type of things.. Works pretty darn slick.
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Drew Weaver
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:46 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Testing
We just went to 5.3.4 SP1 and we are already seeing CSCvc20077 on a few chassis.
I am waiting to hear back from TAC on SP2 release timeline (other than the
standard 8 week answer) assuming the SMU makes it in.
I can also tell you in both lab environment and production environments on 9904
I've performed this upgrade remotely without issue. However it was in a lab
environment with nothing but LSM traffic on it.
Time from reload to CLI via an inband path was about 7min.
That said, I've got about 5 in production slated for upgrade so I'm hoping for
positive responses to this
As far as I know you can POP 2 on the 920 but you can only push one.
Darin
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mike
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 9:16 AM
To: Adam Vitkovsky;
3560-X Switch Software Configuration Guide
OL-25303-01 1 Configuring MACsec Encryption This chapter describes how to
configure Media ...
From: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com>
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 1:00 PM
To: Darin Herteen; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne
I'm currently testing MACSec using Cisco 3560-CX in the lab in a
Switch-to-Switch manual deployment and so far so good. If you don't want to get
elaborate the price point might be attractive..
Darin
From: cisco-nsp on
One of my use cases for the 920 was MVPN using mLDP Profile 1.
I have it operating thus far without issue in my lab today on 03.16.01a.S
Darin
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka
Sent:
Thanks everyone for the responses as they have been quite informative.
QoS strategies/testing was next/last on my list to hammer out this week so the
behavior mentioned below is especially helpful.
Regards,
Darin
From: cisco-nsp
Greetings,
I'm in the processes of evaluating a ASR920-24SZ-IM for a variety of services
and I'm struggling to find a definitive list of feature limitations as they
pertain to BVI interfaces and time constraints aren't going to allow me to lab
all permutations.
I've reviewed the slide deck
It's not so much about features I'm looking to implement so much as it is
possible features I may lose.
Today, some customer Internet access is L2 transported back to a 9010 and
service is terminated on L3 do1q sub-int.
If I wanted to entertain the idea of deploying a 920 closer to a customer
This might work...
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:LAB_9904#run
Mon Nov 23 14:48:05.274 UTC
# sftp
usage: sftp [[user@]{host1[:]}][filename1]... [[user@]{host2[:]}][filename2]#
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Jared Mauch
Interest here !
Darin
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 8:03 AM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris); Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] The Family
Greetings list,
I'm dealing with the following issue:
Using an ASR9K (XR 4.3.4) I am modifying a prefix-set that is called in a
route-policy for outbound filtering on a peer to an upstream provider.
These modifications will increase my announcements by about 60 prefixes (based
on testing to
] On Behalf Of Darin
Herteen
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:38 PM
To: Nick Hilliard; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Max-Prefix - Notification Data Decode Options ?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:24:36 +
From: n...@foobar.org
To: syn...@live.com; cisco-nsp
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:24:36 +
From: n...@foobar.org
To: syn...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Max-Prefix - Notification Data Decode Options ?
On 10/03/2015 17:13, Darin Herteen wrote:
which the provider states should fall
within their allowed max
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:28:33 +0100
From: f...@zz.de
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] asr9k/trident - ipv6 bgp attributes / enrich nfdump files with
AS for ipv6 from MRT dump
Flo,
Make sure you have the following provisioned underneath the address-family:
bgp
Here is a good one on RPL.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/88676/asr9000xr-understanding-and-using-rpl-route-policy-language
Any further resources written by Xander and you'll be in good hands.
From: sc...@granados-llc.net
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:49:11 -0500
To:
Locate the NP that handles Te0/1/0/3 by :
show controllers np ports all
then:
show controllers np counters npx location 0/1/CPUx
The following are some helpful links:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/110671/asr9000xr-np-counters-explained-xr421
Greetings List,
I have been trying to hunt down some definitive answers regarding
interoperability using non-cisco AP's running CAPWAP in conjunction with a
Cisco WLC 5508 running 7.3.101.0.
A TAC case I opened on this issue didn't really give me a definitive answer
only to say that a
Well... not that this will help that much, but it is available on 6.0(2)N1(1)
5548-11# format ?
bootflash: Format bootflash:
slot0: Format slot0:
usb1: Format usb1:
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:42:01 -0400
From: bran...@burn.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
Well you can use Stateless DHCP for handing out DNS,SIP,NTP,etc.. , and there
is the following command for DHCP relay services under the interface config:
ipv6 dhcp relay destination X:X:X:X::X
From: michael.rob...@manchester.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:52:09 +
To:
I've been using the following for v6 traffic generation:
http://www.grid.unina.it/software/ITG/download.php
From: frnk...@iname.com
To: g...@greenie.muc.de; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:52:49 -0600
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Does the entire BGP routing table for IPv6 fit on
to see if this is the case, and is this buffer usually per line card, or
per slot (both/either?)
-Drew
From: Darin Herteen
[mailto:syn...@live.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:54 PM
To: Drew Weaver; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Gigabit Interface Input
Drew,
Overruns are usually caused by the receiving hardware buffer being flooded
for lack of a better term because the input rate exceeded the
receiver's ability to handle the traffic.
Darin
From: drew.wea...@thenap.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:41:16 -0500
Well from a security standpoint, this link might be useful:
http://www.nsa.gov/ia/guidance/security_configuration_guides/cisco_router_guides.shtml
Darin Herteen
Hi Garry,
my aim is to do review of the configs of ROUTERS and Switches in my network.
As a review , need to track down the best
was helpful. I have been in the process of
upgrading about 8 7600's and I have run into bug after bug with regards to the
upgrade process..
Darin Herteen.
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:32:19 +0400
From: k...@linkey.ru
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] In Service Software Upgrade
From: syn...@live.com
To: nrauhau...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] PA-POS-OC3 to Juniper, how to configure?
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:19:22 -0500
I would try adding the following under the POS interface:
crc 32
That has worked for me in the past.
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:48:10
I always try to put customer name - Circuit ID. I've found ip addressing and
bandwidth are too dynamic and become inaccurate over time
Darin Herteen
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:07:09 -0500
From: peteli...@templin.org
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Send
Subject: [c-nsp] Interface
in advance,
Darin Herteen
_
Windows Liveā¢: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_allup_1a_explore_042009
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
30 matches
Mail list logo