Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question

With the 656 Kbps limit for the Data-DSCP class, your reserved bandwidths total 1152 Kbps, or 75% of a 1.536 Mbps interface. Remember that by default IOS will only reserve up to 75% of an interface's bandwidth. You should be able to change this with the 'max-reserved-bandwidth ' command applied

Re: [c-nsp] Fake Gear?? 2621XM

This page has some good info and pics: http://www.andovercg.com/services/cisco-counterfeit-wic-1dsu-t1-v2.shtml -- stretch http://packetlife.net Paul Stewart wrote: Hi there. Does anyone have a guide or list of stuff to look for if you think you've been sold fake gear? I've gathered litt

Re: [c-nsp] Strange vlan behavior

le count' to inspect all known MAC addresses). If the leaked frames can't be tolerated, consider raising the aging timer or configuring static MAC addresses on each interface. --- Jeremy Stretch http://packetlife.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've got a network I'm looking at

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC Transport mode

design requirements are. Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS Senior Network Engineer Coleman Technologies, Inc. 954-298-1697 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:12 AM To: Jeremy Stretch; ci

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC Transport mode

Ziv, I have a setup very similar to what you describe, a transport mode tunnel between two 3725s connected via satellite. We have accelerators in place but I'm not familiar with them. It's a fairly standard setup; what do you need to know? stretch http://packetlife.net Ziv Leyes wrote: Hi,

Re: [c-nsp] News Item: Cisco Turns Routers Into Linux ApplicationServers

Oh, it's been done... http://www.kdvelectronics.eu/uClinux-cisco2500/uClinux-cisco2500.html stretch http://packetlife.net/ David Coulson wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> So, we can run Linux on the Cisco routers, >> > My understanding is that you run Linux on an x86 device connected

Re: [c-nsp] Wanting to learn Juniper...

ch makes > sense. > > Unless the term shutdown doesn't seem clear in an interface? I would > assume it does to the majority of people though, IOS familiar or not. > > On 11/04/2008, at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Stretch wrote: > >> Tolstykh, Andrew wrote: >>> Cisco I

Re: [c-nsp] Wanting to learn Juniper...

Tolstykh, Andrew wrote: > Cisco IOS is in fact extremely intuitive, there is nothing intuitive > about the JunOS IMHO. I can't speak on JunOS, but considering that the IOS command to enable an interface is "no shutdown," IOS may not be as intuitive as you think. stretch http://packetlife.net ___

Re: [c-nsp] changing from ospf to eigrp

> Can I run both at the same time? If you do, you may want to consider tweaking the administrative distances until EIGRP has been fully implemented across the network. Remember, by default EIGRP has an AD of 90 (internal) and OSPF of 110, so EIGRP-learned routes will be preferred. This has the

Re: [c-nsp] CCSAT updated?

Nipper is very thorough, actively maintained, and includes the capability to audit some non-Cisco gear. Nipper is here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nipper and a handy review of it is here: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=276 Stretch Ultra wrote: > Is there any place to obtain an

Re: [c-nsp] Port Traceroute utility?

The Linux tracepath utility should do what you need; it's effectively a traceroute using UDP on an arbitrary port: http://linux.die.net/man/8/tracepath Stretch Jonathan Charles wrote: > This is going to sound weird, but I am looking for a utility that will > let me tracroute on a specific port