to also address this on SNMP level. But I'm starting to
have doubts that CoPP is practical for doing this. It would require
users to be able to specify specific ACLs to define/refine CoPP
"classes". Is that possible at all?
--
Simon.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
TM, sigh) and SNMPv3. One of SNMPv3's distinguishing
features is that it DOESN'T use community strings anymore. So I'm a bit
confused as to what the problem is. Is there some implicit mapping from
SNMPv1/2c communities to SNMPv3 usernames/passwords? Or are the
2F0::254/64
exit-vrrp
I don't claim to understand this (or the reason why the prefix length is
required for non-link-local addresses. I'm sure my teammates know! Can
ask them on Monday...
Cheers,
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puc
salk9-mz.152-4.E7.bin
Is it definitely a 3750G? If so you're using the wrong image. 3750G images
start c3750-, and come in ipbase/ipservices variants.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/
sive than the list price for the
5502SE - although I'm told by my Cisco AM that there are some 'amazing' deals
to be had on the NCS-5500 range. I'll have to talk to my friendly Arista
reseller again.
Many thanks for the insight,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailin
, recommendations, scare stories? Does anyone understand the
licensing on them? I've struggled to find any Cisco published information
about what is/isn't included in each of the license options...
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
ng a similar(ish) issue with a couple of WS-X6908-10G
cards in a 6504 chassis with SUP2T where we're seeing fabric drops now we're
pushing about 50Gbps over a 6x10G etherchannel split over the two cards.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.
ffected by any known bugs, then they offer this as a seperately
chargeable service. Yes, really, they want us to pay them more money to find
out how buggy their code releases are...
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/
is shut down, then reallocate memory to the new copy of the
> Internet routing table from the new ISP?
Yes, it will.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nethe
92160 is based on Cisco silicon (ASE3, I think).
So they can't even blame Broadcom :)
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ation MAC (i.e. after the two MPLS labels) starts with 4
or 6, yes.
The Nexus 92160 is being used as purely a L2 switch. It doesn't even support
MPLS...
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listi
On Fri Dec 02, 2016 at 03:16:17PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Remind me - are you running the Nexus 9000 as a PE router, or as a basic
> Layer 2 Ethernet switch?
Basic Layer 2 Ethernet switch, sat between two of my MPLS P routers.
The Nexus 9000 does not support MPLS.
On Wed Nov 23, 2016 at 12:01:20PM +, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> On Fri Nov 04, 2016 at 03:40:05PM +0000, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> > To me, everything *looks* right, it's just that some VPLS traffic traversing
> > the new link gets lost.
>
> For those who are interested...
>
On Wed Nov 23, 2016 at 12:07:26PM +, James Bensley wrote:
> Yep. This is why I always use the control word. Turn it on and your
> problem will probably go away.
If only. Extreme EXOS doesn't support control word :(
(Or, at least, I've not found the right knob to turn yet)
On Fri Nov 04, 2016 at 03:40:05PM +, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> To me, everything *looks* right, it's just that some VPLS traffic traversing
> the new link gets lost.
For those who are interested...
Well, I finally got to the bottom of this, and have pushed it to Cisco TAC
for
On Fri Nov 04, 2016 at 03:40:05PM +, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> Anyone got any suggestions on what I should look for whilst troubleshooting
> this?
Well, having got myself to a point where I could reliably reproduce the
problem, I think I've narrowed down the issue...
On the 100G on the
he impact to traffic, I have to make any changes
within a maintenance window, but I've run out of ideas of things to try or look
for.
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cis
ter to import.
If you're doing full BGP, you will find the SUP720-3BXL slow, but if you can
cope with that, and are careful with your RAM usage, then it'll work.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mail
it's fine, I'd
not accept the same from the 3rd party partner, as when we move onto another
support partner in the future, they'd be under no obligation to honour the
agreement.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.n
his is just cosmetic and because the DFC4-EXL isn't
what was shipped with the original card, but I'm not happy, so pushing for them
to supply a card which doesn't have this warning.
Has anyone done this before? Anyone seen this before?
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mai
isco camp of performance testing :)
Yes, under ideal conditions you can probably get close to linerate on them,
but stick general Internet traffic through them, and you won't. I believe it's
a limitation on PPS, so jumbo frames are what let you fill the port
ports on each, so on paper it's not oversubscribed.
However, you'll be lucky to get more than about 25Gbps aggregate throughput
through the blade.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cis
that I get the correct kit from the start.
These toys aren't cheap :-(
Wait until you want 40G or 100G - then you'll realise that 10G stuff is
cheap :)
Simon
--
Simon Lockhart | * Server Co-location * ADSL * Domain Registration *
Director| * Domain Web Hosting * Connectivity
two or three
4-Port 10GE cards would do.
That's per 6704 card. In aggregate, we were probably doing close to 100Gbps
of traffic through a 6509 chassis, but only because traffic was flowing over
it several times.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
).
Simon
On Thu Nov 27, 2014 at 11:05:18AM +, R LAS wrote:
Hi Simon
can you detail more ASR9k can be more flexible on EoMPLS (VPLS) than 6807 ?
Regards
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:26:55 +
From: si...@slimey.org
To: dim0...@hotmail.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
or Linecards that are available today (current limit is 80G/slot).
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
more capable card.
Many thanks in advance,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
)?
Many thanks,
Simon
On Sat Oct 04, 2014 at 11:56:45AM -0400, Pete Lumbis wrote:
It would be a single pass through the QFP. The SIP could also be a limiting
factor, but since you are split between SIPs that shouldn't be an issue.
The SIP 40 has 2x 40Gig lanes on the backplane. Are you doing
above.
If I poll ceqfpUtilProcessingLoad by SNMP, I see peaks of around 65%, which
would correlate with this level of throughput.
I'm assuming there are others of you using this platform. What sort of
throughput are you seeing? Am I right, or is the Cisco TAC engineer?
TIA,
Simon
packets
0 output errors, 0 underruns, 0 applique, 0 resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
0 carrier transitions
Cheers,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
Thank you for that.
Pointed at this counter incrementing.
RESOLVE_L2L3_QOS_C_DROP_CNT
Now to find out why!
From: Darin Herteen [mailto:syn...@live.com]
Sent: Monday, 9 June 2014 1:46 p.m.
To: Simon Allard; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Cisco 9k TenGig interface Output
ESP-40, how close I
am to the 40Gbps aggregate switching limit.
Do you know if this information is obtainable by SNMP?
Can I find similar information for the SIPs?
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
are running at at least 80% line speed at peak time.
Is there any way to determine the utilisation levels of the SIP's and the ESP?
Could I put more 10G ports in these ASR's, or will I just be oversubscribing
the SIP or ESP?
Many thanks,
Simon
.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
is apparently the first platform which
properly supports termination of broadband users, using DHCP, as IPoEoQinQ. I'm
just waiting for the loan box to arrive to prove it in the lab.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
seconds]
[Duration: -4194.1 seconds]
[Duration: -4194.05000 seconds]
[Duration: -4194.05000 seconds]
[Duration: -4194.05000 seconds]
[...]
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
Where are you getting this information from?
As of 8.4 they redid the licensing for anyconnect and also added ikev2 ipsec to
the anyconnect suite unless I missed something.
If you can get pics
[cid:image001.png@01CC9AD5.10537C00]
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks
Simon Thomason
Network Engineer
2649 Logan Road
Eight Mile Plains, QLD, 4113
PO Box 4 Springwood, QLD 4127
T +61 7 3361 2359
F +61 7 3841 1048
E simon.thoma...@racq.com.aumailto:simon.thoma...@racq.com.au
W racq.com
http://www.racq.com.au[cid:image001.jpg@01CC2B42.71ED1320]http
for people to solve, so how do others sort
it out?
The devices I'd typically use include Cisco 6500/SUP720, ME3600, ASR1k, and
smaller stuff like the 3750/3560.
Any suggestions?
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wed Apr 17, 2013 at 12:57:05PM -0700, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
Simon Lockhart wrote:
What I'd come up with is that I'd ignore the inner tags, and just
use the outer S-Tag to put the properties into subnets (one per
S-Tag), and then just do DHCP. However, I'm not quite sure how I'd
achieve
is running
at around 30%.
I'd probably start by looking at MTU - is this box having to do a lot of
fragmentation? That will kill the CPU very quickly.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
about this in the release notes, or via google.
Given that it works fine on 12.2, I don't think it's failing hardware. Could
it be a hardware revision issue? (Other cards in this chassis are 2.4+)
Thanks in advance,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
this one is
going to have to go for a potential RMA on the card.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
seem to see CSCtz33305, but it'd be good to know if there's any
workaround to avoid hitting this issue...
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
trying to source one to be able to carry out some further testing.
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
for BGP performance?
Many thanks in advance,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
.
Are there any cookbooks / cribsheets for using CoPP to rate limit BGP?
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
for the RP,
and 2 * 10GE SPAs?
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Just adding to my last questions about hp and FCOE Has anyone seen anything
like this?
Can only get maximum 2 fabric logins per fabric from FCOE devices using
Emulex 554 CNAs (have 4 servers/8 CNAs)
Results from starting each server in order, 30 secs apart:
Boot server 1 only – both CNAs
but anyone run into something like this
before?
Good with the LAN side not so good with the SAN.
Cheers,
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
worry) and
they you get additional BIOS settings to config FCOE and then you can see
the ports in DCNM. Interesting on that is not documented anywhere.
If anyone is interested will do a proper write of it at some point.
Cheers,
Simon.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:45 AM, John Gill johg...@cisco.com
Does the printer have a default gateway as in able to see outside its own
subnet? Can you ping/tracroute to it?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Quinn Kuzmich
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:04 PM
To:
Sorry I am pretty certain I total miss read this one. Split tunnelling will
only work if you specify what is and is not interesting traffic for the VPN and
local network.
Depending on what client you are using you can enable local lan access in
anyconnect (not certain if there is an option for
Always a good idea to read the field notice and current / fixed bugs in your
new IOS. There might be a bug but it might not be relevant to your situation.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot
Hi John,
I just upgrade our branch fleet of 2960s' to 15.0.1-SE2 if that helps.
Cheers,
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot
Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 9:13 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thomason, Simon
Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2012 9:16 AM
To: 'John Elliot'; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960S IOS
Hi John,
I just upgrade our branch fleet of 2960s' to 15.0.1-SE2 if that helps.
Cheers,
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun
they intend to backport this to
older Supervisors - I suspect that these Netflow implementations are
quite different internally.
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
forwarding-table allocations for ease of IPv4-to-IPv6
migration
122 Mpps routing for IPv6 compared to double that for IPv4.
Simon
On Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 03:07:43PM -0500, harbor235 wrote:
I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6?
V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able
) for your openness and willingness to answer questions on this list.
I find it very helpful and greatly appreciate it.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
to see if the ASA would support Dot1x and does not look
like they do as this might have been a different option.
Cheers,
Simon T
Renew your membership online, simply visit
http://www.racq.com.au/my_racq/make_a_payment today.
Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
30, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Thomason, Simon wrote:
have the ASA aware that the device connecting is an IPAD and heavily restrict
its access.
Why does being an iPad make a device somehow undesirable and deserving of heavy
restrictions?
It can be argued that the iPad is at least superficially more
be done right now.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:c...@0x1.net]
Sent: Monday, 30 January 2012 3:16 PM
To: Thomason, Simon
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and ipads
On Jan 29, 2012, at 22:28, Thomason, Simon simon.thoma
Do you know what the limit to vlans on flexfabric is? As we seem to be running
into an issues with Vlan limits right now and depending on which person/website
I ask depends on the limit.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Tried all of these things kind of lost on this one. Waiting to hear back from
HP.
-Original Message-
From: Håvard Staub Nyhus [mailto:hny...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 11:16 PM
To: Thomason, Simon
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 5k with HP flex
Hi All,
Has anyone run into issues with adding new vlans to a VPC for HP blades? I have
just provisioned a new network to pump down to my HP blades but have run into
issues on the HP farm.
Currently have 12 chassis spread over 2 sites with 2 new networks (1 per site)
not working at all at one
8 -rw- 600 Mar 8 2010 12:46:20 +10:00 vlan.dat
9 -rw- 2795232 Dec 5 2011 18:26:24 +10:00 SampleAudioSource.ulaw.wav
10 -rw- 18294 Jan 18 2011 12:23:56 +10:00 CRN11R01-18012011.CONF
260153344 bytes total (189607936 bytes free)
log
Simon Thomason
and then filtering 99.9% of the text away by regexp. Does the
ASR1k software have these kinds of options?
Best regards,
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/data_sheet_c78-527494.html
VPN Protocol Choice SSL (TLS and DTLS), and IPsec/IKEv2
New in AnyConnect 3.0
* AnyConnect now provides a choice of VPN protocols, allowing administrators to
use whichever protocol best fits
You could use EEM and tcl scripts to do this.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2011 4:15 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Changing VLANs
Hi all
Sh activation-key
ASA# sh activation-key
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual
Maximum VLANs : 150perpetual
Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual
Failover :
Hello all,
I just wanted to know if you could start the anyconnect 3.0 client on a windows
xp machine as service or system process so normal users can not ctrl + alt +
del and kill the process.
Cheers,
Simon T
Members save 1%* p.a. on car loan rates with no ongoing fees. Apply today
Etherchannel?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of zaidoon h
Sent: Sunday, 9 October 2011 9:52 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] redundant Cat3560 trunk links
How to connect redundant
Cat3560
IPv6 multicast...never seen that before]
The PFC3 used the HW Netflow table for IPv6 multicast forwarding.
Apparently the PFC4 supports wide enough keys so that the normal
forwarding TCAM can be used for IPv6 multicast, just like for IPv4
unicast/multicast and IPv6 unicast.
--
Simon
come from people within Cisco (e.g. TMEs), well-paid
consultants, or from the community. (Fortunately for you there are
places like cisco-nsp with the purpose to help small financial-services
institutions avoid paying expensive consultants! ;-)
--
Simon
like this and whether there is a quick fix (other than stop using IE7).
WAAS mobile version 3.5.2
Cheers,
Simon T.
Save money and avoid queues – pre-purchase discounted Ekka tickets at your
local RACQ store. Visit: racq.com/entertainment
Please Note: If you are not the intended recipient, please
don't see many
drawbacks with that. SX got 32-bit AS numbers before SR :-P
SX is even bound to have tons of marginally useful MPLS fatures,
because so many enterprise networks use MPLS these days.
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
More information is required!
What interfaces are you working on?
What makes you think it is a spanning-tree issue? Logs debugs?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky
Sent: Friday, 22 July
Thanks for the heads-up! There's some more technical information about
the Supervisor 2T in the White Papers section:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps708/prod_white_papers_list.html
--
Simon.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
Hey All,
Just doing a little research at the moment for some design work and I found out
that you can not plug a switch into a nexus2k as all ports are host ports.
I am certain a least a few people on here have had a look into this and was
just wondering if there is some kind of work around?
I just saw this email going over the release notes now. I did not see that
CSCtn94753 was fixed but only skimming over right now.
Flex links looks pretty interesting along with Orphan port shutdown.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
That only works if the private AS is originating the routes. Since the Private
AS's are actually in the middle of the path that command will do nothing.
I have been struck by this issue in the past, and the only way I could resolve
it was to change my private AS's to publics, or originate the
Are all the clients and server in sync with time? Just out of interest.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Edward Iong
Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2011 4:53 PM
To: engel.lab...@gmail.com
Cc:
Hey All,
Was just wondering if anyone has started to use n5000-uk9.5.0.3.N1.1c.bin NX-OS?
I have been advised this will fix a few issues with our monitoring solution
Statseeker (nexus does not send correct snmp info to statseeker).
Currently running on n5000-uk9.5.0.2.N2.1.bin so there are
Configuration would be a good starting point?
I am assuming you have checked all the basic things; Plugged in and powered on?
Cabled correctly (Multi or single mode cables)? Interface show fex or optic?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] problems with 6500 and syncing sup config.
On 06/01/2011 02:33 AM, Thomason, Simon wrote:
Been getting the following error when doing a write me on a 6500.
Jun 1 11:16:35.721 EST: %SYS-SPSTBY-4-CONFIG_NV_NEED_OVERRUN: Non
config data present
what process show startup would be in the show process and
have not as yet been able to find information as to which process this would be.
Anyone seen this before or know of a solution?
Cheer,
Simon.
Hot foot it to RACQ MotorFest at Eagle Farm Racecourse on 17 July and swoon
over Queensland’s
Hey All,
Just wanted to check something off with the subject matter experts.
Last night did an upgrade on my pair of nexus 5k from 5.0.2N1.1 to 5.0.2.N2.1
and ran into and issues where after one device was rebooted one of my VPC
failed until the second Nexus one was upgrade.
I am pretty
On Tue Mar 29, 2011 at 10:35:41AM -0700, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
VPLS and H-VPLS will be supported in the next release coming out in June
2011.
On the ME3600X as well, or just the ME3800X?
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
got one (so far) which I'm going to
be using as an EoMPLS endpoint. It has all the features I need for that.
If I wanted an ethernet access box that did L3 with IPv4 and IPv6, then I would
(and do) use a 3560G (or 3560E if I need 10G).
Simon
___
cisco
Hey All,
Was just wondering if anyone has had much luck using generic copper sfp in a
nexus 5020? I have run into an issue with a generic SFP will not bring the port
up on my 5k but a Cisco one work first time.
I do know that Cisco will say to use a Cisco sfp but there is a rather big
price
wrote:
On 3/21/2011 6:22 PM, Thomason, Simon wrote:
Hey All,
Was just wondering if anyone has had much luck using generic copper sfp
in a nexus 5020? I have run into an issue with a generic SFP will not bring
the port up on my 5k but a Cisco one work first time.
I do know that Cisco will say
Simon Leinen writes:
For l3 traffic only. Still can't export l2 ipv6 netflow data, even
though the records can be viewed on the PFC. :-(
I hadn't known about that particular restrictions, but there are others:
* The AS number fields aren't filled in in IPv6 flows. I understand
(although thankfully they can produce Netflow
accounting from IPv6 traffic now).
Exporting v9 data to a v4 host should be OK. Last time I looked,
Simon was messing around with some v6 samplicator code, but the last
update I saw on the Google Code page was almost a year ago.
Right[1]. I do have UDP
Nick Hilliard writes:
On 27 Feb 2011, at 11:49, Simon Leinen simon.lei...@switch.ch wrote:
Not much of a risk because Hank has 7600s, which don't know how to send
Netflow packets over IPv6 (although thankfully they can produce Netflow
accounting from IPv6 traffic now).
For l3 traffic only
that (as the switch complained at me when I hadn't done it).
I also tried it without a VRF, which didn't help either.
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
suggestions on what's going wrong?
Is there a better way to acheieve what I'm trying to do?
Many thanks,
Simon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
something here but that seems like a simple
enough question and answer?!?!
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Muhammad Atif Jauhar
Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:21 PM
To: cisco-nsp
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml
should cover you off.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of JA Colmenares
Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 2:54 PM
To:
.
You might want to also have a look at OTV on the nexus 7k if you want layer2
site to site.
Cheers,
Simon T
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger
Sent: Tuesday, 4 January 2011 10:23 AM
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
