> On 22 Oct 2015, at 17:42, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:20:43PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> [..]
>>> you're in trouble;
>> Well, not exactly.
> [..]
>> In other words - you???re safe, the box won???t melt, but the situation
>> will require fixing & reload.
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:20:43PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
[..]
> > you're in trouble;
> Well, not exactly.
[..]
> In other words - you???re safe, the box won???t melt, but the situation
> will require fixing & reload.
Well, "require reload" definitely smells like "in trouble", no? ;-
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 10:55, James Bensley wrote:
>
> I will probably aim for 60k IPv6 routes, so it's enough to phase out
> the boxes and that's it. Be careful that these boxes will start to CPU
> switch packets before you run out of TACM. When you see these logs
> you're in trouble;
Well, not
We currently have 560163 routes in Internet VRF for IPv4, with 120K
available for IPv6, My BGP process is taking ~456MB memory. Router is
running fairly new IOS15.2(4)S4a. We only import default routes per VRF per
PE for IPv4 and same plan for IPv6. any future scale limit?
Krunal
On Tue, Oct 20,
Just a tiny tidbit related to TCAM reallocation, make sure the SP
bootvar's config register matches the RP bootvar's config register. In
tech-speak, 'sh bootv | i eg' should match 'rem com sw sh bootv | i eg'.
If it doesn't, "conf t; config-register 0x2142; end; conf t;
config-register 0x2102;
On 20 October 2015 at 09:55, James Bensley wrote:
> I will probably aim for 60k IPv6 routes
2 byte boundary, should have said 64k routes, doh!
James.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-n
On 14 October 2015 at 13:32, krunal shah wrote:
> hi NSPs,
>
> Is any one doing 6VPE and importing full IPv4 and IPv6 routes in same VRF?
>
> I am planning to implement full IPv6 and IPv4 routes in same VRF that is
> used for internet service and other PE routers would only get subset or
> default
On 14/Oct/15 14:32, krunal shah wrote:
> hi NSPs,
>
> Is any one doing 6VPE and importing full IPv4 and IPv6 routes in same VRF?
>
> I am planning to implement full IPv6 and IPv4 routes in same VRF that is
> used for internet service and other PE routers would only get subset or
> default routes.
hi NSPs,
Is any one doing 6VPE and importing full IPv4 and IPv6 routes in same VRF?
I am planning to implement full IPv6 and IPv4 routes in same VRF that is
used for internet service and other PE routers would only get subset or
default routes. Suip has 4 GB of memory, My 1M TCAM space is carved
