Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-24 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi, make sure OSPF is configured properly and you can see router loopbacks advertised in the IGP: LDP establishing adjacencies is not enough to generate labels. Also, as the pseudowire is simply Eth-to-Eth, i guess you don't want the interworking feature (interworking ip) to lie within the pseud

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-24 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:54:06PM -0400, L'argent wrote: > interface TenGigabitEthernet5/1 > mtu 1538 > ip address 10.1.1.37 255.255.255.252 > mpls traffic-eng tunnels > mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface > mpls bgp forwarding > mpls label protocol ldp > mpls ip I'm not sure if y

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-23 Thread L'argent
L'argent wrote: Gert Doering wrote: On the interface that forms the EoMPLS bridge ("towards the customer"), you should NOT enable any MPLS stuff. (I'm not sure what happens if you do, but that's not required). Ok. Removed. You need the MPLS stuff on the 10G interface that interconnects

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-23 Thread L'argent
Gert Doering wrote: On the interface that forms the EoMPLS bridge ("towards the customer"), you should NOT enable any MPLS stuff. (I'm not sure what happens if you do, but that's not required). Ok. Removed. You need the MPLS stuff on the 10G interface that interconnects the routers. The

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-23 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:14:50PM -0400, L'argent wrote: > interface GigabitEthernet4/2 > mtu 1526 > no ip address > speed nonegotiate > mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface > mpls bgp forwarding > mpls label protocol ldp > mpls ip > xconnect 10.0.0.114 100 encapsulation mpl

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-22 Thread Ray Burkholder
> > > > Setup: Two directly connected Sup32's directly connected one running > 12.2-33.SXH5, the other 12.2-33.SXI1 otherwise identical > configurations. > Goal: Test (new) MPLS configuration using EoMPLS (xconnect) between > G4/2 > on each. I want to transport 1G over a 10G link between two sit

[c-nsp] EoMPLS/Sup32/xconnect - missing something obvious

2009-05-22 Thread L'argent
Setup: Two directly connected Sup32's directly connected one running 12.2-33.SXH5, the other 12.2-33.SXI1 otherwise identical configurations. Goal: Test (new) MPLS configuration using EoMPLS (xconnect) between G4/2 on each. I want to transport 1G over a 10G link between two sites. Problem: T