n
> *Cc:* Pete Templin; Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
>
>
>
> And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
> which should answer all your questions:
>
> https://supportforums.cisco.com
Bacon
Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:09 -0500, Jeff Bacon wrote:
> I'm seeing round-trip latencies of approx 250us pushing data through the
> FWSM,
That latency sounds much like what we're seein
puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
which should answer all your questions:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668
Sincerely,
David.
___
cisco-n
m
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
I am, however, left with one mystery.
How can the Cisco docs on a FWSM claim a 30-usec latency when clearly it
isn't capable of that, at least not in any configuration that I'm aware
of? Granted that it's all
n the main data sheet on the main product page for
the card is a pretty ballsy lie even for Cisco.
From: David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) [mailto:dwhit...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:04 AM
To: Jeff Bacon
Cc: Pete Templin; Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-ns
: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:04 AM
To: Jeff Bacon
Cc: Pete Templin; Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
which should answer all you
And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
which should answer all your questions:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668
Sincerely,
David.
Jeff Bacon wrote:
>> I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
>> single flow could exceed 3Gbps
> I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
> single flow could exceed 3Gbps. The PoXXX interfaces don't have
> explicit gigabit members - any chance you know where to find some
> documentation showing the single-gigabit/flow limit?
from the 4.1 config doc, page 2-8:
On 6/2/11 4:22 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Two things to keep in mind:
1) Any one flow cannot exceed 1 Gb/s, since the connection to the FWSM
is a 6 port etherchannel.
I recall it being two 3Gbps etherchannels, so I'd always assumed no
single flow could exceed 3Gbps. The PoXXX interface
On 6/2/2011 3:09 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
Hi folks -
So, in an attempt to address some fun issues with NAT I'm having with my
6500s, I'm considering resorting to the use of an FWSM as a fancy
specialized NAT device - call it a complicated hairpin, if you will (one
VRF is on one side of the FWSM, on
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:09 -0500, Jeff Bacon wrote:
> I'm seeing round-trip latencies of approx 250us pushing data through the
> FWSM,
That latency sounds much like what we're seeing, around 300 us.
> and a relatively ridiculously high rate of packet loss.
Two things to keep in mind:
1) Any
Hi folks -
So, in an attempt to address some fun issues with NAT I'm having with my
6500s, I'm considering resorting to the use of an FWSM as a fancy
specialized NAT device - call it a complicated hairpin, if you will (one
VRF is on one side of the FWSM, one is on the other, the VRFs
communicate
12 matches
Mail list logo
