Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I can confirm unity connection stops :) a reboot gets it going for another 24 hours unless you fix the violation. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 12, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: > > I also believe what happens during the grace period and after also differs. > > For example, I do

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I also believe what happens during the grace period and after also differs. For example, I don't think callmanager ever stops working, but connection might. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/administration/guide/9xcucsagx/9xcucsag310.html#pgfId-1092685 If the re

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

>FWIW, the grace period on a 10.5 install is 180 days :) I have 174 >days left on one I installed last week. The Callmanager grace period is 180 days, but the Unity Connection grace period is shorter (90 or 120 days, I can¹t remember which). I found this out the hard way. -- Steve Rubin

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I think this pretty much comes down to Josh is escalating because of customer requirements for compliance. Once you are in Sev 2 you are going to get a fairly quick response. He is also doing the LCU cases and spending time on the frontend verifying what his customer owns. This cuts down on som

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Specifically ask for the "migrate to 9" team and provide the case you opened for your upgrade validity check (LCU). Once that is sent call TAC and escalate to Sev2 to cut in line. Sorry, but that bumps you down the list when I call in. 😁 Sent from my Windows Phone __

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Every request I've submitted comes back with this: Hi Mike, This email is to update you on your case status. We are still waiting for our Product Managers response as we are currently experiencing high volumes. In the meantime, I will keep you updated on the status of this request. And usually

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Erick, I just did an RU from 8.6 to 10.5 and the grace periodic demo mode was 60 days. I also just violated an already in production 10.5 and that was 180 days. Which one are you referring to? On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:22 PM Erick Bergquist wrote: > FWIW, the grace period on a 10.5 install is

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

There is even an app for this - https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cucm-upgrade-central/id650114526?mt=8 > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5 > From: btal...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:02:17 -0600 > CC: j...@warcop.com; mik...@msn.com; avholloway+cisco-v

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Sounds like we're all going through the same process and it's just a matter of timing. Josh and Erick have been submitting info up front. Though it still takes them just as long to work through licensing it sounds like it's premigration delay so it's not as impactful. That's a viable workaroun

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

FWIW, the grace period on a 10.5 install is 180 days :) I have 174 days left on one I installed last week. But as Josh said, the couple I've been involved with recently have been done within a few days if you get stuff together ahead of time and push it up the chain to get done at time of migrat

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Have I been living in a cave, or has it always been the case, no pun intended, that you can view the details of any TAC case? Can I just type in random numbers and see other peoples cases? If not, and I hope not, else I need to start sanatizing my log files, what are you planning on doing with th

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5 and Self Provisioning

Nope. All it does is a device to DN association regardless of the device. From: jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:06:03 + Subject: [cisco-voip] 10.5 and Self Provisioning Is the new 10.x Self Provisioning does CallManager care wha

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I'm curious.. Are you guys using https://survey.opinionlab.com/survey/s?s=10422 OR https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/Quickstart Get Other Licensing... --> Migration --> Voice Products --> And submitting the ELM request? Prior to all of this you need to have a separate case complet

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I have close friends that are SE’s and if there is some magical external email address that gets a faster response from GLO then we all (partners and customers) will benefit from it. From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:59 PM To:

[cisco-voip] 10.5 and Self Provisioning

Is the new 10.x Self Provisioning does CallManager care what model phone the user gets? We are using all SIP phones but two difference model. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Unicast me one of your case numbers I want to see how you are getting past all the BS. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:28 PM To: Mike ; 'Haas, Neal'; 'Bill Talley' Cc: 'cisco-voip' Subject: Re: [cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CCX 10.5 Editor Issues

I am having constant issues with the 10.5 editor. Sometimes it won't load, now it won't open the repository. I've seen other various reports, does anyone have any ideas? Thanks! Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 __

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

No magical powers here. I don't wait around for things to happen. A licensing error is still an error and the clients I work with have zero tolerance for this giant licensing banner popping up indicating they are out of compliance. Sent from my Windows Phone Fro

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

You are supposed to select the drive to collaboration issue type for speedier routing. I don’t think it does much at this point. Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I'm trying to remember the exact verbage, but at cisco Live they told people to put 8.6 to 10 upgrade in the subject so it got routed to the team Josh alluded to. I also think there was an email address to send to, but I can't remember for sure. Just my 2 cents also. Scott On Fri, Dec 12, 2014

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I’ve never seen it take that long once you are on the new licensing platform. The biggest issues I’ve seen is from pre-9.x to 9.x or 10.x Josh must have magical powers because licensing is a nightmare. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, Neal Se

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

It just took us 39 days to get our licensing for 9.1.1 to 10.5 Neal Haas From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Talley Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:50 PM To: Josh Warcop Cc: cisco-voip Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turn around time 8.6 to 10.

[cisco-voip] sending sip 403 Forbidden msg upon reception of ISDN DISCONNECT msg

Hi, I have a cisco voice-gateway (SIP to ISDN), model 2811 with c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8.bin ios. Scenario: 1) dial from sip client an outside pstn number (my mobile phone). 2) I do not answer the call, instead I tear it down, hitting the red button during ringing. This what I get on t

Re: [cisco-voip] 8831 registration problems with 9.1.1a

Just a update on this, the 8831 went down again due to power issues in the location and was a bear to get up and working again. It came up after a couple dozen attempts of shutting down port for different periods of time, changing vlans, bringing port back up, etc. Left it shutdown for 10 minutes a

Re: [cisco-voip] CFA/SNR fails with 503 Request Timeout at Proxy...

Hi, Do we see this message inbound on cube??, then it would be worth asking vz if they need something specific on redirected calls. On 12-Dec-2014 10:33 am, "Jonathan Charles" wrote: > CCM - H323 - CUBE - SIP TRUNK - Verizon SIP > > We are seeing the following SIP errors on CFA/SNR calls: > > S