Maybe confirm the signaling required?
I think it was an e&m variant that used star ani star dnis star
Reference:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/voice-over-ip/ani-and-dnis-support/td-p/163473
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/analog-signaling-e-m-did-fxs-fxo/214636-troubleshoot-and-
In CSCvb81026 a workaround was reconfiguring OpenSSH on the windows server
SSHD config file for windows config file has SSHMaxConnections=16 and
SSHTimeout=60 respectively. Removed these parameters and CDR-CAR backup
completed successfully.
So far I do not see any option to disable or extend
Yep. Several instance where I see this then even creation of remote account
fails. At that point it is likely filesystem corruption. You can try recovery
disk. But likely rebuild and restore.
-Wes
On Jun 5, 2023, at 8:17 AM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
platform config xml is created during insta
many thousands.
From: cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 10:46 AM
To: Tim Reimers mailto:treim...@ashevillenc.gov>>;
Wes Sisk (wsisk) mailto:ws...@cisco.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip@pu
Thanks Tim
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:17 AM Wes Sisk (wsisk)
mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Yes, registration information is in RIS not in SQL(informix). I see some other
mentions of this, but not clear resolution.
Note that ATA may follow different CM server resolution and 'sh
Yes, registration information is in RIS not in SQL(informix). I see some other
mentions of this, but not clear resolution.
Note that ATA may follow different CM server resolution and 'show risdb' is
per-node. Aka, have you checked all nodes with CM service activated where ATAs
might be register
Generally speaking there should be adequate info in CDR to track the multiple
call legs. There are examples of tracking call flows here:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/11_5_1_SU7/cucm_b_reporting-billing-administration-guide-1151su7/cucm_b_reporting-billing-administ
I'm not sure about the webex calling implementation.
In UCM it was intentional to write CMC to CDR and to not write FAC to CDR. That
would be kind of like writing passwords on stickies and posting them in the
hallway.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmfeat
I think maybe you're referring to "forward maximum hop count". That parameter
is used to guard against call routing loops caused by numbers being forwarded.
There is also a "max hop" parameter for multicast music on hold. That might be
more related to high cpu on boundary devices or failing to r
CSCvt97709 was for systems that installed using an older 80GB OVA and then
upgraded.
Partition sizes documented in CSCvt97709:
TotalFreeUsed
Disk/active 14154228K 319736K 13689364K (98%)
Disk/inactive 14154228K 82
Hello Reto,
This looks like every RTP packet is duplicated.
This could be an artifact of how the packet capture was taken. Was a SPAN or
similar feature used that might duplicate packets? Are the packets truly
duplicates? Sometimes this IP ID field is useful
Otherwise, this could be a recordin
ons of cucm cluster backups is that too many, although
I’ve not seen anything to say so.
I’m going to change the file path tomorrow and see what happens with that.
Andy
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 19:16, Wes Sisk (wsisk)
mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote:
What is the exact error? What do DRS logs
What is the exact error? What do DRS logs show?
I see one report that after re-install dbreplication is not established leading
to "Unable to send network request to master agent. This may be due to Master
or Local Agent being down”
Resolved by resetting dbrepliaction for all nodes.
Thanks,
We
Not easily. You’d need to join ~4-5 tables to get that information. Any
especial characters would botch record delineation in CLI output.
https://developer.cisco.com/docs/axl/#!12-5-cucm-data-dictionary
-Wes
On Feb 18, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Louis Koekemoer (MEA)
mailto:louis.koekem...@dimensionda
On UCM cli ‘utils diagnose test’ to ensure things look mostly okay from OS and
low level perspective.
After that in UCMadmin ensure system->server shows the correct IP/name for each
server.
After that ensure ccm process restarted (or whole server rebooted). Based on
your description SDL links
As a person who still processes 400+emails per day for more than a few years
now (gulp) I hear you about the abundance of information and communication
channels. I am still working on integrating WxT in my information processing
model. I am still decommissioning my SDLRouterThread,SDLTimerThread
Upcoming Talk:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/online-tools-and-resources/collaboration-solutions-analyzer-support-talks-event/ba-p/4178251
CSA can help to identify and diagnose issues in Collaboration deployments
including device registration and call failures.
CSA Tool:
https://cway.cisco.com/c
Possibly:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/conferencing/telepresence-server/118345-probsol-telepresence-00.html
-Wes
On Apr 2, 2020, at 12:11 PM, James Dust
mailto:james.d...@charles-stanley.co.uk>>
wrote:
That’s fixed it thank you Kent,
From: Kent Roberts mailto:k...@
Keep on connecting those users:
https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/products/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/obtaining-temporary-licenses.html
-Wes
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.
When last I looked PUT fulfillment was by electronic posting and download in
countries where that is legal. Some geo’s require physical media and the
creates a shipping limitation.
What inefficiency do you experience with PUT?
Thanks,
Wes
On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:17 PM, Ryan Huff
mailto:ryanh...
this.
When last I looked:
PUT does create a sales order which helps address any licensing questions,
re-issues, etc.
‘Upgrade’ media isn’t always the same as install media. PUT gets bootable
install media in case of reinstall or disaster.
And PUT doesn’t get the latest SU. PUT gets latest Maint
Yes, this is still open. Inquiry initiated. Thank you for the reminder. Bonus
points if you can open a case that we can link to the bug.
-Wes
On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Anthony Holloway
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Source: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSC
Adam,
Yes, the reservation appears steep and outside monitors appear ripe for
harvesting underutilized resources.
And 3 things come to mind:
* ccm.bin at its core is a distributed real time state machine. Delays have
serious impacts. Feature are invoked across nodes. See the long history arou
Correction: it will not be visible.
On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) via cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> wrote:
Whoops, I thought it was. Thanks for the callout Lelio! It should be visible in
24 hours.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvh30732
6354 |
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram,
Twitter and Facebook
[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
On Mar 20, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) via cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip@p
Please note at this point the 8851 product manager has elected not to address
that request. If this feature is important to you then please press your
account representative more.
Regards,
Wes
On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:56 AM, James Dust
mailto:james.d...@charles-stanley.co.uk>>
wrote:
Hi Reto,
Nick,
The features you describe are propagated by both SDL signaling and with a
dependence on database replication.
At casual observation it sounds like database traffic between nodes may not
prioritized and may be delayed or dropped.
The 80 msec is especially important for near real-time conv
Nick,
The command is invoking database commands that Cisco does not own. They are not
being obtuse; they genuinely do not know.
It will cause a spike in database communication between nodes.
My first guess is very much in line with yours that the burst in traffic
exceeds certain QoS queues.
I
Working on it.
Until it is resolved, and not the greatest workaround as it contains other
things, try looking under “Cisco Meeting Server”.
For example:
CSCve59084CWMS OVA can not be deployed on vCenter 6.5
-Wes
On Jul 30, 2018, at 2:36 PM, Anthony Holloway
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gm
Looks like it was known broken at one point:
The DNS Query Response TTL of the secondary DNS server is not being respected
by the 9971/9951/8831 phones if the primary server goes down after the first
request.
Resolution Summary
CSCut29536 for 8831 IP Phones
CSCut29519 for 99xx IP Phones
CSCut756
I have seen Hammer used for inbound call verification before:
http://www.empirix.com/products/hammer/
-Wes
On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Nick Barnett
mailto:nicksbarn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks. I am aware of the multiple carriers... but I think being able to cover
the edge services would be
+1. I have seen syn scan or TCP half open cause alerts with no ip, no mac.
you can get some insight if this happening using the workaround for
CSCsw73304CLI show open ports to show ports in SYN_RECV
-wes
On Dec 20, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Dave Goodwin
mailto:dave.good...@december.net>> wrote:
An
I’ll add a hard learned lesson here:
Example:
Subscriber sends a frame >1500 bytes. IF the frame makes it through the network
it will by dropped by the NIC on the publisher if it exceeds the MTU configured
on the publisher. You will not see the frame with ‘utils network capture…’ on
the publish
because it’s primarily a misconfig.
-w
On Jul 20, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Wes Sisk (wsisk)
mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote:
From Syslog, we can see lot of "DBLException" with reason code 746 (on Pub and
Sub)
From knowledge database, similar cases of "DBException with reason
From Syslog, we can see lot of "DBLException" with reason code 746 (on Pub and
Sub)
From knowledge database, similar cases of "DBException with reason code 746"
have been solved by cluster reboot or Subscriber re-build.
try ‘risdb query…’ commands from CLI on cucm. restart ccm process, or ide
What particular features do you like about it (use)?
-w
On May 8, 2017, at 6:38 AM, Ben Amick
mailto:bam...@humanarc.com>> wrote:
Can confirm, reissued my CCX license myself in 2 minutes through that page just
the other day.
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun.
That is indeed enforced globally.
There is no way to enforce this natively in CUCM. If you have any type of
firewall or stateful inspection between CUCM and the gateway and using H.323
then you might look at terminating sessions. You might be able to do an
automation with EEM on the gateway.
bmead...@gmail.com<mailto:bmead...@gmail.com> [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 10:55 AM
To: Wes Sisk (wsisk)
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Traffic Issues with
Potentially, yes.
Feature does not get reset in situation of ‘no sip’ … ‘sip’. If
allow-connections is not enabled then connections not allowed.
-w
On Nov 18, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Scott Voll
mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Would this affect phones not registering?
CSCui62452
Scott
__
en the earlier response that these devices are now done with support, this
does not bode well, but, we are still looking.
Regards,
Adam Pawlowski
SUNYAB NCS
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) [mailto:ws...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 12:50 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam
Cc: Tommy Schlotterer;
cisc
ly confirm the reason we're having trouble, even
if we can't directly fix it.
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) [mailto:ws...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 12:52 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam
Cc: Tommy Schlotterer;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisc
Phones process ICMP traffic with low priority and throttling. This was
implemented to stem DoS attempts. Consider looking more at Voice Quality
effects, retransmits in packet captures, or parsing CCM traces for round trip
times. As you state these phones are relatively late in life and therefore
https://help.webex.com/docs/DOC-10317
?
-w
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Jason Aarons (AM)
wrote:
Has anyone received any cases where Cisco Jabber version11.7.1 stops working
after upgrading their iPhone or iPad iOS from version 9 to 10? Or any other
Apple related cases?
Jason Aarons, CC
CSCus83367BAT- Error when trying to update values for slots of VG350 SCCP
gateway
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus83367
-Wes
On Sep 25, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
So, when I try to BAT in the VG350, it fails on module 4 and kicks error:
2036 DOMAIN NAME
depending on how far you want to go:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_1_2/ccmfeat/fsgd-712-cm/fsxfer.html#wp1043824
-w
On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Erick Bergquist
mailto:erick...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yep, seen that scenario a few dozen times with unity.
Restricti
https://www.google.com/#q=ios+toll+fraud+h.323
?
-wes
On Sep 11, 2016, at 9:37 AM, David Zhars
mailto:dzh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
So yesterday I was alerted by our landline company that some of our phone
numbers that come in POTS on an H323 router, we being used for phone fraud. I
am wonderin
There was a specific effort to improve and trim the guides while targeting the
most common use cases and end to end workflow. Are there valuable things
missing?
-w
On Aug 30, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Erick Wellnitz
mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I thought I was missing something obvious.
IMHO this is where it gets interesting. We have to leave the ‘digital’ world
and enter the ‘analog’ world. The “FXO” emits a signal, it travels across the
wire, and might possibly be echoed back at the electrical level. Get the
o-scopes ladies and gents. When the firmware of the FXO card reports
spot on. right up until they invented analog answering machines… then we *HAD*
to have analog disconnect supervision.
-w
On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Norton, Mike
mailto:mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>> wrote:
A phone company cannot magically reach into your house and put your POTS phone
on-hook. On
alternatively looks like the FXO port might be configured to to tone disconnect
supervision. try disabling that all together and work forward from there. IIRC
(dis)connect supervision is implemented in firmware on the card and is only
sent back to IOS as an asserted event. Alternatively stated:
Looks like "make sure that you have the secondary drive on which all the data
will
be saved is with drive letter as E: and not something else as D: or F:. You can
rename it
under Control Panel>Administrative Tools>Computer management.”
-Wes
On Jan 19, 2016, at 7:15 PM, Foryanto J. Wiguna
wrot
I tracked one of these down once several years back:
a calls b
a puts call on hold
b transfers call to c
c answers and hears MoH
when a, b, and c are all phones registered on the same node/cluster this
shouldn’t happen. However, if the call from a to b traverses a trunk
(SIP/H.323/MGCP) then th
This is what Contact center tries to do via CTI.
-w
On Sep 16, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Mark Holloway wrote:
Does anyone know if it’s possible to query CUCM over HTTP/HTTPS to see if a
user is available to take a call? (ie. is the phone registered, is DND on or
off, are all lines occupied and the use
phones download the tone files as part of the locale. could be a bad file
served up from the CME router. Could be the file was downloaded and corrupted
in phone storage.
suggest changing locale, reset phone, try again, then reset locale back.
alternatively, hard reset phone.
alternatively regis
ain
Unified Contact Center
Cisco Services
Direct: +1 919 392 9898
Hours: M - F 9:00am - 5:00pm Eastern Time
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Charles Goldsmith
Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 5:21 PM
To: "Wes Sisk (wsisk)"
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] glibc/ghost vulnerability
Gotcha, t
I’ll lead off with: UCCX does a fair amount of work to customize the VOS
platform to their needs. As such they don’t pull in updates and fixes as fast
as UCM, UC, and CUP.
I bet if you check the kernel or RHEL version you will find significant
difference and that contributes to the complexity o
>From 10.5.2:
10.5.2.1-5
00710403.002 |13:32:04.919 |AppInfo ||DialingForest=
{
|DigitForest=Dialing
{
|Partition=
|TreeType=TREE_TYPE_DIGIT
|Patterns=
{
|(**##*01) }
|(**##*02) }
|(**##*03)}
|(**##*04)}
|(**##*05)}
|(**##*06)}
|(**##*07)}
|(**##*08)}
|(**##*09)}
|(**##*10)}
Thanks for pointing this out! I’ll get the doc updated.
The rest of the list:
"**##*1", // analysis trace on/off
"**##*2", // terse/verbose toggle
"**##*3", // dump digit discarding instructions
"**##*4", // dump patterns
"**##*5", // dump partitions list
"**##*6",
not tested, theoretically sound, YMMV. No guarantees, warranties, etc.
use a route group with top down hunting. your real gateways are the first
entries.
last entry is an h323 gateway. the destination IP is the local CM. This is
essentially a loopback going out/in the IP interface.
Use the CSS f
yeah, we’ve tried to improve DNA several times to make it more accurate.
something about it being “difficult” ;)
-w
On Jun 10, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Ryan Huff
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Thanks to all who replied. I hate asking inter-digit questions because they are
so basic BUT can be a
Good call out Andrew.
adding a quote so that this might register a little more…
"When the leap second update occurs it is possible for the kernel to hang or
halt.” Kernel offline means all services/applications/processes offline. This
is a little important.
-w
On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:53 PM, And
yup.
DNA is a close approximation, but in specific corner cases it deviates from
dalib
I put my chips on an unexpected overlapping pattern
I troubleshot one of these long ago that turned out to be the intercept pattern
for Cisco Messaging Interface (CMI for SMDI integration). When you consider
Looks like others have found this as well. No indication if this is a problem
or working as designed.
I’m still looking for external facing documentation.
-Wes
On Jun 5, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Erick Bergquist wrote:
Has anyone seen the snmp-chassis-server-id interfere with CCM-manager
TFTP downloa
my first guess:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab10/collab10/presence.html
?
On May 29, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Anthony Holloway
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm reading through all of the available IM&P documentation I can find and I
keep seeing
i’m not aware of a phone with a workable mic profile. i did some work with
cardioid mics in another life and those seem to fit the bill. a bit of a
stretch but what about having multiple soft clients with cardioid mic inputs?
one iPhone or iPad per conference with attached mic
-w
On May 28, 20
ve over simplified my original explanation.
I have several gateways that this exact same scenario happened to. All
experienced the same condition, with the same configurations.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk)
mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote:
a couple things here -
you say
a couple things here -
you say MGCP.. if using MGCP and d-channel bachaul then it is CCM’s ISDN stack
in use. Where did you see the error “mandatory IE missing?” if it was with
debugs on the gateway then it may have been generated by the gateway’s ISDN
stack.
each isdn ‘switch type’ has subtle
Hi Jon,
Continuous ring voltage is a bit interesting. Have you ruled out L1 / cabling
issue?
Next best approach is to get the telco to supply correct/consistent ring
cadence for the region - these vary around the world with US defaulting to 2 on
4 off, IIRC.
After that it gets advanced, and
RIS reads a shared memory segment populated by the ccm process. If no server in
the cluster can see registration status when phones are registered to that sub
then likely the ccm process on that node has stopped updating shared memory on
that node. you can verify this with ‘utils query risdb’ fr
Checking, but not AFAIK. You might follow
CSCuc24135Increase the 1024 characters limitation in the partition list for
a CSS
-Wes
On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Jason Aarons (AM)
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
Anyone familiar with planned changes to number of Partitions in a
CSCul38509CUCM DRS backup fails with windows 7 and 2008
Symptom:
CUCM 8.6.2 or 9.1(2) and later DRS backup may fail due to interoperability
issues with Windows 7 or Windows 2008 based SFTP servers or any SFTP server
which uses SMB2 to access disk storage.
Conditions:
This has been observed
Looks like it varies based on product. Typical Hardware/Software/Warranty
discussion still applies. Software support that becomes hardware replacement
may be up charge (re-entitlement)… etc.
-Wes
On Dec 17, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
Thanks for the repl
Hmm,
These should help:
CSCsm26337need clear messages for h225 tcp session failure
In versions with fix h225 session setup is clearly indicated in cm sdi traces
with one of these messages:
H225Cdpc(%07d)::requestConnect_TcpStartSessionErr: H225 Tcp Start Session
request failed
H225 Call is a
The components displayed on the first page are defined by an XML file stored on
the UCM server. Likely that file is missing or corrupt. Any unexpected power
outages or filesystem issues?
Filenames on the server are documented in the footnote here:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/65651/c
es CER work? will the PSAP call back the line or
does it call back the phone?
I have a dialing plan that doesn't allow for much in the way of non DID numbers
so have a very limited amount to use.
TIA
Scott
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk)
mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> w
Agreed with Ryan, Anthony, and Erick.
Give the phones DN’s, even just internal DN’s. It is “burning a DN” in the
sense that number is allocated. That number does not have to be a DID. Give the
phones/lines a CSS that PLAR’s to a help desk. Or at least allow them to invoke
local emergency servic
I see suggestions that the last redirecting number is the desk number.
-Wes
On Oct 23, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to figure out how we can identify call legs from Mobile Connect that
are going out to long distance destination numbers. We have a number of IT
s
That is closed as being unreproducible in other environments. The workaround
was not documented. This bug is submitted for review and cleanup.
Best route to forward progress is a TAC case.
-Wes
On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Erick Wellnitz wrote:
Any of our Cisco people able to shed a little mo
Both should be visible within 48 hours.
-Wes
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Peter Slow wrote:
both of the defect posted here appear as internal and can't be viewed,
at least at the moment,with the bug search tool...
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:42 AM, James Andrewartha
wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> After
Brain,
Thanks for sharing! I’ve often found that an open mind, or willingness to be
wrong, has to led to the most interesting investigations.
This is an interesting use case. It suggests another “best practice” for
auditing configs. Is this another iteration of “call routing loops” because the
a few ideas to explore:
* hunt group login/logout
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/8_5_1/ccmsys/accm-851-cm/a03rp.html#wp1100559
* Incoming calls to a shared line, let users change the call forward all
settings on the shared line
* build a web service that changes f
Historically caused by a firewall, or similar inspection or NAT device, in the
network that is failing to parse specific messages used during call setup and
call transfer.
Quick test - place 3 phones as close as possible, from a network perspective,
to UCM and test. If working there then indica
What features do you use in Cisco Technical Support Mobile App? What features
would you like added?
Android:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cisco.swtg_android&hl=en
Apple: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cisco-technical-support/id398104252?mt=8
Notable enhancements in the las
aging the duration of all CUCM log files on disk, not just CCM SDI/SDL.
Hope this helps
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Martin Schmuker
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:15 PM
To: Wes Sisk (wsisk)
Cc: Cisco VoIP Mailing List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] D
37, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
________
From: "Wes Sisk (wsisk)" mailto:ws...@cisco.com>>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: "cisco-voip
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-
still going to increase total consumed disk space, why not just setup scheduled
trace collection?
1 day is pretty short window to get from user report, through operations, to
TAC case, and investigation.
AFAIK no issues with files/sizes in recent versions.
-Wes
On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Le
onbox logging is circular. It will consume as much space as allocated and then
loop over that. If something goes awry then Log Partition Manager (LPM) will
auto-delete files as necessary.
For Scheduled Trace Collection,
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/8_6_1/rtmt/
Historically this has happened because:
* gateway attempts to setup audio but call signaling is not at a state that
would allow transfer to complete
* the attempt to setup audio sends OpenReceiveChannel to Unity port
* Unity ignores because unity has already sent 2nd transfer and considers the
ca
Ed,
Unity doesn’t parse the soft keys sent from UCM to Unity to understand if
“transfer” is available. Unity just blindly sends transfer and hopes the call
completes.
I believe Progress is insufficient in UCM to enable transfer, usually have to
wait for Alerting.
Attempting to replicate this
+1. Wouldn’t be the first time I’ve thought wrong but I think of these values
as the max msec supported for each codec. I always thought there was an
interesting underlying assumption that devices could do less than the
advertised max msec. i.e. this device support codec 12 with maximum of 60 ms
tbound PRIs
fill up and we start overflowing to the ones we reserve for inbounds can we
tell RTMT to look at the circuit and say that we've got XX amount of outbound
calls on that circuit, and alert us? Can it tell outgoing vs incoming on the
alert level?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:40 A
If MGCP you can see the calls per DS-1 (PRI / CAS) in RTMT and create alerts on
the per-ds1 level but not per gateway and not in aggregate.
RTMT provides the starting point for customization. You can use ‘show risdc…’
from CLI on UCM to see the same counters. Or you can use AXL Serviceability AP
With diagnostics enabled then it comes down to whether the endpoint supports
CMRs and any insert errors that may occur when CAR attempts to insert raw
records into the database.
1. what are the endpoints in question? what version of code?
2. any interesting CMR errors? have you checked the plain
WIP.
In the mean time:
Symptom:
Switch might remove power from inline powered phone
Conditions:
This happens if the phone does LLDP power negotation while sending both the TIA
Power TLV and the 802.3at Power TLV
Workaround:
None
This looks to be triggered by phone advertising by multiple proto
Hi Daniel,
Great find!
For the document:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/46806-cm-crashes-and-shutdowns.html
The initialization process and timers have changed *significantly* since 4.x.
Some examples include:
CSC
>From a previous encounter:
Problem Description:
After upgrading Call Manager from 8.6.2.2-2 to 8.6.2.22900-9, ccmuser
friendly url translation via F5 had 6-7 minute delays in loading.
Resolution Summary:
F5 was upgraded to Build 2806 version 11.3 after which the delay was not seen
anymore.
lto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
Requirement is to have a speed dial that automatically enters the FAC.
Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) [mailto:ws...@cisco.com<ma
FAC/CMC is invoked after the route pattern is matched. FAC/CMC only work on the
cluster where the device is registered.
I’m not aware of any conflict with multistage dialing offhand. What does
multistage dialing mean to you?
-Wes
On May 2, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Heim, Dennis
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt
I’m not aware of RouteLists doing “Run on all nodes” in 7.x. Going way back in
time they did. In 7.x the route list should have registered on the nodes in the
associated CM group.
I suspect you are hitting one of CSCtq10477, CSCul71689, CSCum85086
Checking the box just started using DeviceManag
n name=
|SdlSig-O |CtiRegisterParkDNMonitorRes
- Daniel
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:15 PM
To: Wes Sisk (wsisk)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo