Luca Gibelli schrieb:
Hello xterm1,
Is there any way to tell freshclam what ip to use
to get it's updates. We have a problem with our main ip
being locked out due to an attack.
Now there is no way to do that, afaik.
As a temp. fix, add a static route for some mirrors and specify them in
On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 06:54, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Clamd was reloading correctly but clamav-milter
not. Is this a bug
At the risk of repeating myself from yesterday, this is fixed in CVS.
Sasa
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL
Hello!
I'm working on an smtp content filter which does virus scanning with
libclamav (I do not use any clamav daemon).
I pondered about how to handle av database updates and want to find
an elegant solution not want to stop and start the filter daemon.
I tried the following:
when my content
Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
At 16.22 29/11/2004, you wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 13:00, Gareth Blades wrote:
I am running Suse Openexchange - Amavis (clamd) - Postfix.
Mine lets through 24, 25, 27.
In my configuration:
FreeBSD, sendmail-milter, noattach, clamav-milter 0.80j I got no virus
And now a wish:
Is possible to implement in clamav-milter or clamd itself the
possibility to define a list of suffix I'd like to consider as:
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
That is not the job of a virus-scanner, it's the job of a content-
filter.
-Nigel
V sre, 01.12.2004 ob 10:11 je Nigel Horne napisal(a):
On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 06:54, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Clamd was reloading correctly but clamav-milter
not. Is this a bug
At the risk of repeating myself from yesterday, this is fixed in CVS.
Well, when it will be official? This is a
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:01 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Clamd was reloading correctly but clamav-milter
not. Is this a bug
At the risk of repeating myself from yesterday, this is fixed in CVS.
Well, when it will be official? This is a production machine so I do not
want to use CVS
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:15:51 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 30 Nov 2004 15:12, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:55:25 + in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nigel Horne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been fixed in CVS.
Any ideas on
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:41:57 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when my content filter daemon starts, it calls a function called
init_cl(). when I upgrade the av database I send a HUP signal to my
daemon and call reload_cl().
It should be called periodically and not only depend on SIGHUP.
V sre, 01.12.2004 ob 14:05 je Nigel Horne napisal(a):
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:01 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Clamd was reloading correctly but clamav-milter
not. Is this a bug
At the risk of repeating myself from yesterday, this is fixed in CVS.
Well, when it will be
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 14:13 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
thanks. Is it possible to use command OnUpdateExecute to reload
clamav-milter directly? I saw this option in freshclam.conf.
No need, using the model in CVS.
Sasa
___
Sasa Stupar wrote:
V tor, 30.11.2004 ob 16:32 je Trog napisal(a):
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 15:24, Sasa Stupar wrote:
V tor, 30.11.2004 ob 16:20 je Trog napisal(a):
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 15:13, Sasa Stupar wrote:
--
From the log I can see that Clamd has a self check every 1800 sec and
Hej,
I don't know whether this has been discussed allready, I can't find it
in the ML archive at least.
What do you people think about support for external unpackers in clamd?
I know I can use them with clamscan, so why not within clamd too?
I think this would be a great feature, as I (and others
Hello Tomasz!
Ok, I'll check for database updates in every hour
(or shall I do that more often?)
But I would like to know what code is preferred doing so.
I tried the following:
void init_cl(){
int ret, no=0;
if((ret = cl_loaddbdir(cl_retdbdir(), root, no))){
syslog(LOG_PRIORITY,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tomasz!
Ok, I'll check for database updates in every hour
(or shall I do that more often?)
But I would like to know what code is preferred doing so.
I tried the following:
This appears to have nothing to do with improving the ClamAV project. Not that
I'm a topic
Hello Dennis!
Sorry to bothering the list. Where can I find info about using the clamav
library?
SJ
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to bothering the list. Where can I find info about using the
clamav library?
If I remember correctly, it is documented to some degree on the website.
I think the final say as to whether this topic is suitable for the list
is down to Tomasz, no one else.
Did you edit your crontab using 'crontab -e'? If not, the cron daemon
probably won't reread the file on disk and is still acting upon the old
crontab.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Green
Sent: Monday, November 29,
At 12.08 01/12/2004, you wrote:
And now a wish:
Is possible to implement in clamav-milter or clamd itself the
possibility to define a list of suffix I'd like to consider as:
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
That is not the job of a virus-scanner, it's the job of a content-
filter.
I know, but what if
Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
I know, but what if I want to consider them by default undesiderable ?
I think clamav-milter should do the job quite easily.
If it found such attachment it threat like a virus name :
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
Stop... :-)
That is what a content filter is for.
-Original Message-
At 12.08 01/12/2004, you wrote:
And now a wish:
Is possible to implement in clamav-milter or clamd itself the
possibility to define a list of suffix I'd like to consider as:
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
That is not the job of a virus-scanner, it's the job of a
At 20.17 01/12/2004, you wrote:
Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
I know, but what if I want to consider them by default undesiderable ?
I think clamav-milter should do the job quite easily.
If it found such attachment it threat like a virus name :
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
Stop... :-)
That is
I am only trying to understand if it is possible to do with a single
program (clamav-milter) the job of two programs (clamav-milter
and noattach).
Ideally, you wouldn't be using clamav-milter; you'd be using a milter that
does content filtering (amavis?), and as part of that content filtering,
Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
UNAUTHORIZED ATTACH TYPE
Stop... :-)
Do you think the idea is wrong ? In this way, as I said, you could
also lower the cpu load on the antivir box (you discard without check)
and you could fight better the new virus (If my sig doesn't detect,
probably the attach
Jason Haar wrote:
However, a lot of sites complained. They actually looked at the logs and
they didn't like seeing that 44% of their quarantine events were PIF
blocked - they wanted to know WHAT VIRUS IT WAS.
But you have the PIF in quarantine anyway. Couldn't you save CPU by
PIF-blocking
At 22.24 01/12/2004, you wrote:
Jason Haar wrote:
However, a lot of sites complained. They actually looked at the logs and
they didn't like seeing that 44% of their quarantine events were PIF
blocked - they wanted to know WHAT VIRUS IT WAS.
But you have the PIF in quarantine anyway. Couldn't
26 matches
Mail list logo
