I run 'configure' without problems but when I run 'make' the installation
process skip the 'spamd' directory.
Can anybody help me??
Greetings and thanks.
Sebastian.
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Damian Menscher wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Bill Maidment wrote:
Why didn't I get the announcement? I got all the replies!!!
Read the archive of this list back when 0.82, 0.81, 0.80, 0.75.1, 0.75,
or any other release was announced.
Then subscribe to the clamav-announce list.
Damian Menscher
I
Where can I find rpm for FC2? Thank you.
_
Sig. Francesco Maria Giordano
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati
Sezione di Palermo
Via Ugo La Malfa 153
90146 Palermo -
On Monday 14 Feb 2005 02:40, Damian Menscher wrote:
Is there a performance benefit to using --external?
Depends on your set up. I load balance the scanning across several servers
so I use --external.
I'm wondering if
this is similar to the clamscan/clamdscan performance difference. Does
Title: Bericht
Hi,
I
installedclamav 0.82 and dazuko 2.0.5on RadHat ES3.0; kernel
2.4.21-27.0.2.EL according to installation manual Clamav.
depmod
-areturns themessage: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.21-27.0.2.EL/misc/dazuko.o
Clamav works
properly after manual load of
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:15:49 +0100
Francesco Giordano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I find rpm for FC2? Thank you.
yum list clamav:
NameArch Version Repo
Hi,
I want to install clamav on a server running RedHat Enterprise Linux 3
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Kernel 2.4.21-20.0.1.EL on an i686
What version must I take ?
The doc tells about Fedora 1 or 2 at
http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/1/clamav/
Bill Maidment wrote:
Alex S Moore wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and where might one find this new ClamAV 0.83? there's no link to it
that i can find on clamav.net, nor any mention of it at all. most
recent news is for 0.82.
Dive into the 0.82 link to get to the page on sourceforge. 0.83 is
Alex S Moore wrote:
It was on the announce mailing list. I do not think, at that time, it
was posted to the users mailing list.
Read my follow-up post about an hour ago.
--
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:42:37 +1100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex S Moore wrote:
It was on the announce mailing list. I do not think, at that time,
it was posted to the users mailing list.
Read my follow-up post about an hour ago.
The
using clamav-milter .83 i get:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ...
while using .82 i got:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82/databaselevel/databasedate on ...
i thought the .82 contents quite interesting - maybe the two info types
could be merged, somehow,
Sylvain Bouchet wrote:
Hi,
I want to install clamav on a server running RedHat Enterprise Linux 3
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Kernel 2.4.21-20.0.1.EL on an i686
What version must I take ?
The doc tells about Fedora 1 or 2 at
I have RPMs and SRPMs for 0.83 available here : http://www.godshell.com/toaster
Enjoy.
Hello,
I am enjoying as we speak =)
Thank you,
Chris
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
[...]
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ...
[...]
That is because SESSION is no longer used by default.
oh - i misread the man page then:
The default build is for SESSION to be enabled.
;-)
anyway - thanks!
--
On Monday 14 Feb 2005 15:41, christian laubscher wrote:
[...]
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ...
[...]
That is because SESSION is no longer used by default.
oh - i misread the man page then:
The default build is for SESSION to be enabled.
;-)
using clamav-milter .83 i get:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on ...
while using .82 i got:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.82/databaselevel/databasedate on ...
i thought the .82 contents quite interesting - maybe the two info types
could be
On Monday 14 Feb 2005 16:08, christian laubscher wrote:
but i'm not using clamd, so what's the difference between keeping a session
open with something i haven't got, and having no session, at all?
Non SESSION mode is legacy code hence the older header format etc.
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger,
Chris Conn wrote:
Sylvain Bouchet wrote:
Hi,
I want to install clamav on a server running RedHat Enterprise Linux 3
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Kernel 2.4.21-20.0.1.EL on an i686
What version must I take ?
The doc tells about Fedora 1 or 2 at
Hi,
I've just downloaded and installed new version (unpacked, ./configure, make,
make install) but I my logwatch now writes me the following:
WARNING: Local version: 0.81 Recommended version: 0.82: 25 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.82 Recommended version: 0.83: 21 Time(s)
WARNING: Local
Hey, thanks for a reply!
No, I did not removed old installs, I thought that they should be
overwritten
Of course I stopped all related services: clamd, clamav-milter sendmail
before install, but did not tried to restart, I'll try to do it this night
but I don't thin that this should help
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Georgy Goshin wrote:
I've just downloaded and installed new version (unpacked, ./configure, make,
make install) but I my logwatch now writes me the following:
WARNING: Local version: 0.81 Recommended version: 0.82: 25 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.82 Recommended
Georgy Goshin wrote:
Hi,
I've just downloaded and installed new version (unpacked, ./configure,
make, make install) but I my logwatch now writes me the following:
WARNING: Local version: 0.81 Recommended version: 0.82: 25 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.82 Recommended version: 0.83: 21
At 10:53 PM 2/14/2005, Georgy Goshin wrote:
Hi,
I've just downloaded and installed new version (unpacked, ./configure,
make, make install) but I my logwatch now writes me the following:
WARNING: Local version: 0.81 Recommended version: 0.82: 25 Time(s)
WARNING: Local version: 0.82
I am just wondering about how long will a stable release be supported
before it get tossed? The sevenX version is no longer really functional
because it has no virii def updates any more. I know lots of people who
build mail servers and would like to not perform any major maintenance
after it
http://wiki.clamav.net/index.php/UpgradeInstructions
On 15 Feb 2005 at 9:08, Georgy Goshin wrote:
Hey, thanks for a reply!
No, I did not removed old installs, I thought that they should be
overwritten Of course I stopped all related services: clamd,
clamav-milter sendmail before install,
25 matches
Mail list logo
