On Sunday 27 Feb 2005 01:33, Sam wrote:
> When I look at scanned email I see this at the top:
>
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/726/Fri Feb 25 07:31:45 2005
> clamav-milter version 0.80j
>
> Am I using an outdated clamav milter, or is that the correct version?
As you can see from the INSTAL
All of our servers that are running clamdwatch.pl that tests to make sure
clamd is running have been outputting:
Clamd didn't find the EICAR pattern. Your virus database(s) could be
borked!
I ran freshclam manually and it says the db's are up to date:
---
ClamAV update process started at Sun Fe
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:22:45 -0500 (EST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob
Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of our servers that are running clamdwatch.pl that tests to make
> sure clamd is running have been outputting:
>
> Clamd didn't find the EICAR pattern. Your virus database(s) could be
>
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Brian Morrison wrote:
> > All of our servers that are running clamdwatch.pl that tests to make
> > sure clamd is running have been outputting:
> >
> > Clamd didn't find the EICAR pattern. Your virus database(s) could be
> > borked!
> >
> > I ran freshclam manually and it
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:38:35 -0500 (EST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob
Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The lack of digital signature support is a bad thing as well, I'm
> > not certain but I suspect that ClamAV may find it rather hard to
> > check the integrity of virus databases that fres
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:38:35 -0500 (EST)
Rob Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> database, as no scripts changed on the server. We're working on
> upgrading, but any other ideas as to what would cause this suddenly
> would be appreciated.
Quoting the README file of 0.81 (released on Jan 26)
> > > The lack of digital signature support is a bad thing as well, I'm
> > > not certain but I suspect that ClamAV may find it rather hard to
> > > check the integrity of virus databases that freshclam retrieves.
> > > And you're 3 versions behind the recommended version.
> >
> > Although I
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:51:46 -0500 (EST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob
Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It may be that something in the db requires 0.83, but I do remember
> > something being mentioned about the EICAR test signature and
> > clamdwatch on this list, have you looked at the ar
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Sunday 27 Feb 2005 01:33, Sam wrote:
> > When I look at scanned email I see this at the top:
> >
> > X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/726/Fri Feb 25 07:31:45 2005
> > clamav-milter version 0.80j
> >
> > Am I using an outdated clamav milter, or is th
Plant, Dean wrote:
I have posted a few previous questions regarding clamscan and problems with
/net on Solaris.
After some further investigation I have found that it impossible to run an
efficient full scan (clamscan -r /) of a Solaris file system if /net is
activated in /etc/auto_master.
This is d
10 matches
Mail list logo
