Re: [Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD

2007-02-21 Thread Rob MacGregor
On 2/21/07, Nicki de Wet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version, however it gets an error in building libclamav. It seems that libpthread is required now, but it does not exist on the system I'm compiling on. It has never had a problem with this in the past.

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Nick Leverton
On Friday 16 February 2007 16:02, Robert Allerstorfer wrote: Enabling the experimental code in 0.90 is dangerous because there has been introduced a critical bug after the last release candidate has been released, unfortunately without giving us a chance to test before releasing it as final

[Clamav-users] SuSE package 0.90

2007-02-21 Thread Jörg Nissen
I installed the SuSE package yesterday. Now I checked the logfiles and realized that freshclam is not running. So I did some debugging and received the following message from freshclam: “freshclam: symbol lookup error: freshclam: undefined symbol: cli_versigpss”. Due to this error no

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Robert Allerstorfer
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, 09:47 GMT+00 Nick Leverton wrote: You are not authorized to access bug #295 I am logged into the bugzilla. Is there any estimate of time to fix ? If this problem has been known about for a week ? We rely heavily on Clam's phishing detection and I'm very pleased with

[Clamav-users] Whats mean this message ?

2007-02-21 Thread Miguel Rois
Can't connect to clamd through /var/lib/clamav/clamd.socket Regards Miguel ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD

2007-02-21 Thread Robert Blayzor
Nicki de Wet wrote: I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version, however it gets an error in building libclamav. It seems that libpthread is required now, but it does not exist on the system I'm compiling on. It has never had a problem with this in the past. Here is the compiler output:

RE: [Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD

2007-02-21 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Blayzor Sent: woensdag 21 februari 2007 13:20 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD The port build breaks as well. Doesn't take long for 4.x

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter start problem

2007-02-21 Thread Obantec.net Support
Hi 0.90 compiled on FC3 (i have been running clamav upto 88.7) clamd is running after a few tweaks of the conf file but clamav-milter fails unrecognized option --dont-log-clean do i just remove the line from /etc/sysconfig/clamav-milter CLAMAV_FLAGS= --quiet \ --external \ --dont-wait \

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Craig Green
Kevin Way wrote: I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled directly from the ports collection, without --experimental. As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then stopped scanning. That sounds like what happened here. See the ScanStream:

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter start problem

2007-02-21 Thread Arthur Sherman
Hi 0.90 compiled on FC3 (i have been running clamav upto 88.7) clamd is running after a few tweaks of the conf file but clamav-milter fails unrecognized option --dont-log-clean do i just remove the line from /etc/sysconfig/clamav-milter CLAMAV_FLAGS= --quiet \ --external \

[Clamav-users] Problem with clamassassin

2007-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I use Postfix, Clamassassin 1.2.3, Clamav 0.9 on a Debian 3.1 System. All was good. Last week i got a virus in my incoming-folder. So i realized, that clamassassin is not running without error: mailheader: X-Virus-Status: Failed X-Virus-Report: /usr/local/bin/clamscan error 40

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamassassin

2007-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hello, I use Postfix, Clamassassin 1.2.3, Clamav 0.9 on a Debian 3.1 System. All was good. Last week i got a virus in my incoming-folder. So i realized, that clamassassin is not running without error: mailheader: X-Virus-Status: Failed X-Virus-Report:

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamassassin

2007-02-21 Thread Daniel T. Staal
On Wed, February 21, 2007 11:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Ok - i have made a downgrade to Clamav 0.88.7 - the version before 0.9 Clamassassin runs now - perfect. Why does the Version 0.9 not work? From the Clamassassin announce mailing list: The problem is that clamscan has removed

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamassassin

2007-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel T. Staal schrieb: On Wed, February 21, 2007 11:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Ok - i have made a downgrade to Clamav 0.88.7 - the version before 0.9 Clamassassin runs now - perfect. Why does the Version 0.9 not work? From the Clamassassin announce mailing list: The problem is

[Clamav-users] [Fwd: [clamassassin-announce] Problems with ClamAV 0.90 and clamassassin 1.2.3]

2007-02-21 Thread Daniel T. Staal
Since I've had to quote this message a couple of times, I thought I'd just forward the whole thing. Daniel T. Staal Original Message Subject: [clamassassin-announce] Problems with ClamAV 0.90 and clamassassin 1.2.3 From:James Lick

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter start problem

2007-02-21 Thread Obantec Support
- Original Message - From: Arthur Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'ClamAV users ML' clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:50 PM Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter start problem Hi 0.90 compiled on FC3 (i have been running clamav upto 88.7) clamd

Re: [Clamav-users] [Fwd: [clamassassin-announce] Problems with ClamAV 0.90 and clamassassin 1.2.3]

2007-02-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:16:02 -0500 (EST) Daniel T. Staal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear clamassassin users, There is a compatibility problem when using clamassassin 1.2.3 with the new ClamAV 0.90 release. The new ClamAV release has changed some of the command line options, and one of

[Clamav-users] missing virus log entry

2007-02-21 Thread Andreas Mürdter
Hi, I updated clamav to version 0.90. I use clamav-milter for e-mail scanning with the options -q -n -N -l. When a virus is received, clamav write no entry in the clamd.log. With the option LogVerbose yes in the clamd.conf only this lines are in the logffile clamd.log. ---snip--- clamfi_envfrom:

Re: [Clamav-users] [Fwd: [clamassassin-announce] Problems with ClamAV 0.90 and clamassassin 1.2.3]

2007-02-21 Thread John Rudd
Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:16:02 -0500 (EST) Daniel T. Staal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear clamassassin users, There is a compatibility problem when using clamassassin 1.2.3 with the new ClamAV 0.90 release. The new ClamAV release has changed some of the command line

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter start problem

2007-02-21 Thread Nigel Horne
Obantec.net Support wrote: Hi 0.90 compiled on FC3 (i have been running clamav upto 88.7) clamd is running after a few tweaks of the conf file but clamav-milter fails unrecognized option --dont-log-clean Ensure logClean is not enabled in clamd.conf Mark

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Kevin Way
Craig Green wrote: Kevin Way wrote: I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled directly from the ports collection, without --experimental. As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then stopped scanning. That sounds like what happened here.

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

2007-02-21 Thread Jay West
It was written... I had the same problems. FreeBSD/i386 6.2p1 and 6.2p0. Compiled directly from the ports collection, without --experimental. As far as we could tell, it just scanned slower and slower and then stopped scanning. That sounds like what happened here. See the ScanStream:

[Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread Graeme Nichols
I suddenly started having the following problem today. The error message is pretty explicit but freshclam is being picky with my 'fix' The initial error follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option AllowSupplementaryGroups requires boolean argument. ERROR:

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:04:37 +1100 Graeme Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I then uncommented the AllowSupplementaryGroups line and added '=1' to the end and got the following error: try true (: Steve ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread SM
At 17:04 21-02-2007, Graeme Nichols wrote: I suddenly started having the following problem today. The error message is pretty explicit but freshclam is being picky with my 'fix' The initial error follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread Graeme Nichols
Steve Holdoway wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:04:37 +1100 Graeme Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I then uncommented the AllowSupplementaryGroups line and added '=1' to the end and got the following error: try true (: Steve Hello Steve, thank you.

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread Graeme Nichols
SM wrote: At 17:04 21-02-2007, Graeme Nichols wrote: I suddenly started having the following problem today. The error message is pretty explicit but freshclam is being picky with my 'fix' The initial error follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamd.conf

2007-02-21 Thread Gary V
ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option AllowSupplementaryGroups requires boolean argument. Kind regards, Graeme. man clamd.conf man freshclam.conf Gary V _ Find what you need at prices you’ll love. Compare products and save at

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages?

2007-02-21 Thread John Fleming
- Original Message - From: Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: clamav 0.90 -- Debian packages? When they make it to Etch, is that when they will be available via volatile? And THANKS