Hi all,
I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to
check it (using Procmail):
/sw/bin/clamscan --mbox --disable-summary --infected --stdout -
(Taken from
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3857428forum_id=11958)
This worked until ClamAV 0.88.7
CPTeam Hostmaster wrote:
I get this in maillog whenever I start clamav-milter:
--
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): local
socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): to
error state
Hi!
I installed Fedora Core 4 including amavisd-new 2.4.2 and ClamAV
0.88.7. Everything worked fine, mails sent via postfix were checked by
ClamAV.
Since the ClamAV version is outdated, I updated to a newer version
0.90.1 (rpms from http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/4/clamav/) and
now I have
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:15:54 -0800
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Moore wrote:
Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC.
The daemon had been running for several days. The mail server only
handles around 500 messages/day. So far, I have no clue.
Alex Moore wrote:
Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. The
daemon had been running for several days.
We have had to remove the experimental code from clamav 0.90.1 on our main mail
server, Solaris 10 SPARC. The daemon just disappeared after about eight hours.
- Original Message -
From: Claus Atzenbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV Users clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:33 AM
Subject: [Clamav-users] --mbox option
Hi all,
I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to
check it (using
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, John Fleming wrote:
I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to
check it (using Procmail):
/sw/bin/clamscan --mbox --disable-summary --infected --stdout -
SEE
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/7/07, Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running 0.90.1 and started to get a bunch of these messages when
scanning PDF's (usually inside a zip file).
I have unzipped the .zip files containing the PDF's, and tried scanning
--On Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:31:28 AM + Jonathan Armitage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Moore wrote:
Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. The
daemon had been running for several days.
We have had to remove the experimental code from clamav 0.90.1 on
On 3/8/07, Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/7/07, Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running 0.90.1 and started to get a bunch of these messages when
scanning PDF's (usually inside a zip file).
I have unzipped the
* Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would, but I'm getting the following error in Bugzilla:
You are not authorized to access bug #396.
I wonder why that is -- it's a stupid idea IMHO.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote:
; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume
We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing over
250K messages a day and have seen absolutely no problems. Experimental
code isn't enabled. I wonder what the difference is with your
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 16:54 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would, but I'm getting the following error in Bugzilla:
You are not authorized to access bug #396.
I wonder why that is -- it's a stupid idea IMHO.
I believe all bugs are coded as security
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote:
; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume
We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing over
250K messages a day and have seen absolutely no problems. Experimental
code isn't enabled. I wonder what the
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:47 +0100, Sebastian Gäde wrote:
Hi!
I installed Fedora Core 4 including amavisd-new 2.4.2 and ClamAV
0.88.7. Everything worked fine, mails sent via postfix were checked by
ClamAV.
Since the ClamAV version is outdated, I updated to a newer version
0.90.1 (rpms from
Hi there --
I recently upgraded clamav to version 0.90.1. The method that I used was
downloading the Fedora Core 5 binaries into a single directory,
and running the rpm -Uvh *.rpm command. The installation completed successfully.
I checked the log files earlier today and I came across
the
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:41 -0500, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
Starting freshclam: ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option
AllowSupplementaryGroups requires boolean argument.
What change(s) do I need to make to what file(s) in order to correct this
problem, and ensure that
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
I recently upgraded clamav to version 0.90.1. The method that I used was
downloading the Fedora Core 5 binaries into a single directory,
and running the rpm -Uvh *.rpm command. The installation completed successfully.
I checked the log files earlier today
On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 +
Mark Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall clamdscan the
clamdscan process dies but clamd continues to scan the file it's
currently on.
clamd will automatically
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:46:04 +
Mark Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 +
Mark Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall clamdscan the
clamdscan process dies but
--
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter
(clmilter): local
socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter
(clmilter): to
error state
--
Googling brought advices to chmod /var/run/clamav to 775
I upgraded my test-system to 0.90.1 without realising that freshclams
default behaviour had changed to using the diff-method rather than
downloading the full cvd file. WHen I found out a bit later, I updated
freshclam.conf, but this seemed to have no effect. This turned out to
be because I'd
On 8 Mar 2007, at 16:57pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:46:04 +
Mark Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 +
Mark Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall
On 3/8/07 8:43 AM, Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You will probably need to read through the whole freshclam.conf and
clamd.conf file to make those changes.
I learned a couple of emacs commands I hadn't found in 12 years of using
emacs, in the course of comparing our running clamd
Hi there --
I commented out the AllowSupplementaryGroups line in /etc/freshclam.conf and
manually ran the freshclam binary.
The update appeared to succeed. Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John W.
Baxter
Sent: Thursday,
Török Edvin wrote:
On 3/7/07, Abdul Rehman Gani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote:
Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a
little bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason
clam just can't keep up. I guess I'll
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:02:40 + (GMT)
Andy Fiddaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote:
; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume
We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing
over 250K messages a day and have seen absolutely no
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Alex Moore wrote:
; On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:02:40 + (GMT)
; Andy Fiddaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;
;
; On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote:
; ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume
;
; We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing
;
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:41:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a new lib - libclamav2, and the new version of clamav is available
on volatile now. What precautions or config updates should I do before
updating this on a running mail server.
I have just upgraded several machines from
I upgraded to latest Webmin after I got latest clamav, and now I get this
when I click on the clamav module:
WARNING: Please fill in the location of the secondary signatures database
(should be daily.cvd (version 0.90) or daily.info (version = 0.90)) in
the module's configuration.
I don't
At 08:35 PM 3/8/2007, John Fleming wrote:
I upgraded to latest Webmin after I got latest clamav, and now I get
this when I click on the clamav module:
WARNING: Please fill in the location of the secondary signatures
database (should be daily.cvd (version 0.90) or daily.info
(version =
31 matches
Mail list logo
